|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2016 21:09:40 GMT
That's why I choose forts and bunkers over landmines.
|
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jan 8, 2016 21:12:57 GMT
How effective landmines actually are? Commandos could walk on them easily. And even a line of landmines doesn't seem to be stopping enemies to paratroop. I'd stick to Bunker and Forts since enemy will either pay the bomber pilot or send their paratroopers to attack the fortresses. its not that landmines kills enemy troops, but the enemy ai cant spam paratroopers ON landmines. so they cant spam on it. which is great. plus you can move your troops on the mines. so your own troops wont be blocked as well what is the case in building forts |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2016 21:22:42 GMT
forts doesn't allow them(enemy units) to slow your units and they doesn't allow enemy to spread out its units
|
|
|
|
Post by Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel on Jan 9, 2016 15:38:41 GMT
How effective landmines actually are? Commandos could walk on them easily. And even a line of landmines doesn't seem to be stopping enemies to paratroop. I'd stick to Bunker and Forts since enemy will either pay the bomber pilot or send their paratroopers to attack the fortresses. its not that landmines kills enemy troops, but the enemy ai cant spam paratroopers ON landmines. so they cant spam on it. which is great. plus you can move your troops on the mines. so your own troops wont be blocked as well what is the case in building forts No, i mean 10 landmines would worth 700. Also, 10 is just not enough. You'll need over than 25 landmines to stop them from paratrooping. |
|
|
|
Post by Horatio Nelson on Jan 9, 2016 15:43:33 GMT
Coastal artillery has feelings too!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel on Jan 19, 2016 15:37:39 GMT
Coastal artillery has feelings too!! CA is the best cannon fodder, actually. It has hp of a Heavy Tank! Unfortunately, the iron cost gave a 1 star countries a slap in the face. |
|
HIS NAME IS JOHN CENA
Guest
|
Post by HIS NAME IS JOHN CENA on Jan 21, 2016 3:36:41 GMT
kanue, tried to beat Your record again. 48 turns grrrrrr... Made couple mistakes. Lost at least one turn, otherwise would repeat my record  If you come up with 45 rounds then I will surrender.  I got space shuttle 2 and didn't get world co conqueror achievement got 76 turns. |
|
|
|
Post by Ancien Régime on Feb 18, 2016 9:31:17 GMT
Thank you for this fantastic guide! I roughly followed it and successfully finished the conquest! |
|
|
|
Post by Ancien Régime on Feb 18, 2016 9:32:57 GMT
Oh damn those 40+ turns finish are crazy haha
Good job to you guys
|
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Mar 7, 2016 19:59:12 GMT
IT works that I can tell you guys. For another challenging but easier conquest try Iran 1950 I tried it and everything you have to do is to capture Ankara, Athens and Istabul then you will become powerful :-) Thanks saltin for an epic guide. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2016 4:19:06 GMT
This guide was helpful I got those wonders under 80 turns |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 23, 2016 3:24:31 GMT
This guide was helpful I got those wonders under 80 turns If you're going for wonders do Saudi-Arabia 1960. This is more as an easy conquest |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2016 3:52:20 GMT
This guide was helpful I got those wonders under 80 turns If you're going for wonders do Saudi-Arabia 1960. This is more as an easy conquest Iran and Iraq is easy for wonders |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Mar 23, 2016 4:12:46 GMT
If you're going for wonders do Saudi-Arabia 1960. This is more as an easy conquest Iran and Iraq is easy for wonders NATO is in general easier since WTO is closer together |
|
|
|
Post by Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel on Mar 26, 2016 5:50:36 GMT
NATO is in general easier since WTO is closer together But WTO are like Axis in '39. They attack first and have great generals, making city steal an easier task. |
|
