|
Post by Washington on Jul 19, 2016 15:33:51 GMT
It's more of I am an American yet I still brought Govorov, a Soviet. Would this mean I betrayed my country? It's a game. Well, was Govorov a Genocidal maniac? goring was
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 19, 2016 15:59:07 GMT
Well, was Govorov a Genocidal maniac? goring was And that's why I'm getting Student instead
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jul 19, 2016 16:08:10 GMT
It's more of I am an American yet I still brought Govorov, a Soviet. Would this mean I betrayed my country? It's a game. Well, was Govorov a Genocidal maniac? A good Soviet supports one (Stalin). The point is, if you apply RL to games to the logical end, then you and I are even worse than Hilter for nuking millions of lives into radioactive ash (the cities shouldn't be still standing in the aftermath). We are truly amoral people for looking forward to the challenge of allowing the aliens wipe out nearly 80% of humanity at the beginning of a 1975 conquest all so because some of us were bored and had nothing to do after finishing 1960 and got all of the best generals. Etc etc... Nothing to be said of the megalomania in us the part where we gamers love to paint the entire world with one color in various games like EW4, WC3, and even Civ5 or EU4 or Vicky 2? Be honest, the only real reason why we don't do this in real life is because of the truly horrific costs to human life and plus it takes too much work to take over the whole world, not worth it in the end anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 19, 2016 16:11:31 GMT
Well, was Govorov a Genocidal maniac? A good Soviet supports one (Stalin). The point is, if you apply RL to games to the logical end, then you and I are even worse than Hilter for nuking millions of lives into radioactive ash (the cities shouldn't be still standing in the aftermath). We are truly amoral people for looking forward to the challenge of allowing the aliens wipe out nearly 80% of humanity at the beginning of a 1975 conquest all so because some of us were bored and had nothing to do after finishing 1960 and got all of the best generals. Etc etc... Nothing to be said of the megalomania in us the part where we gamers love to paint the entire world with one color in various games like EW4, WC3, and even Civ5 or EU4 or Vicky 2? Be honest, the only real reason why we don't do this in real life is because of the truly horrific costs to human life and plus it takes too much work to take over the whole world, not worth it in the end anyway. Very valid point. I still don't get Hitler and Goring, ever
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jul 19, 2016 16:48:53 GMT
A good Soviet supports one (Stalin). The point is, if you apply RL to games to the logical end, then you and I are even worse than Hilter for nuking millions of lives into radioactive ash (the cities shouldn't be still standing in the aftermath). We are truly amoral people for looking forward to the challenge of allowing the aliens wipe out nearly 80% of humanity at the beginning of a 1975 conquest all so because some of us were bored and had nothing to do after finishing 1960 and got all of the best generals. Etc etc... Nothing to be said of the megalomania in us the part where we gamers love to paint the entire world with one color in various games like EW4, WC3, and even Civ5 or EU4 or Vicky 2? Be honest, the only real reason why we don't do this in real life is because of the truly horrific costs to human life and plus it takes too much work to take over the whole world, not worth it in the end anyway. Very valid point. I still don't get Hitler and Goring, ever I don't blame you, they're really are people who you wouldn't want to be around in RL. I am opposed to anti-Semitism in RL btw, so I wouldn't want to be around those people either.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 19, 2016 16:50:47 GMT
Very valid point. I still don't get Hitler and Goring, ever I don't blame you, they're really are people who you wouldn't want to be around in RL. I am opposed to anti-Semitism in RL btw, so I wouldn't want to be around those people either. Of course. Their antisemitism is revolting, as are their personalities (Goring was a morphine addict who liked to dress in togas, y'know)
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jul 19, 2016 18:04:55 GMT
Well, was Govorov a Genocidal maniac? A good Soviet supports one (Stalin). Well obviously if you don't support a guy like Iosif Vissarionovich Stalin WHILE STILL LIVING IN RUSSIA then you're totally from the CIA
|
|
|
Post by Ivan Kolev on Jul 20, 2016 1:55:58 GMT
Of course, Hitler was a monster for killing Jews, Gypsies, Jahovah's Witnesses, Orthodox Christians, etc. etc., but if you abuse a dog, that just makes you worse than a dog (which of course he was). Animal abuse is actually a foreshadow to a dark future, as multiple videos on infamous serial killers has, unfortunately, taught me.
I have a very, VERY large soft spot for animals. If an animal gets hurt or is killed in a movie, it somewhat ruins the movie for me unless it is pivotal to the plot. Even if its a guinea pig, I am somewhat revolted if they die in a movie.
This shouldn't make it surprising that I hope to own a large amount of animals, specifically dogs, when I grow up.
This is my rant, Hitler is, of course, a monster for the reasons other than his dog abuse, but i just wanted to get this out.
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jul 20, 2016 2:03:39 GMT
*snip* I will add more soon for Ottoman France and Austro Hungary. The research amount will be HUGE Could you add Paul von Hidenburg as a better version of Erich von Falkenhayn or...a potential replacement for Erich von Falkenhayn if there's too many German generals. Update the list please if you will?
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Jul 20, 2016 6:20:48 GMT
Adding Hitler? Only reason for adding him I would see is him being the role of a butt monkey, you know him getting destroyed all the time over and over again.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jul 20, 2016 6:22:21 GMT
Adding Hitler? Only reason for adding him I would see is him being the role of a butt monkey, you know him getting destroyed all the time over and over again. Yup. Just have him in 1-2 campaigns where he's confused, on a militia, in the line of fire
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Jul 20, 2016 6:54:24 GMT
*snip* I will add more soon for Ottoman France and Austro Hungary. The research amount will be HUGE Could you add Paul von Hidenburg as a better version of Erich von Falkenhayn or...a potential replacement for Erich von Falkenhayn if there's too many German generals. Update the list please if you will? Why not both
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jul 20, 2016 6:58:28 GMT
Adding Hitler? Only reason for adding him I would see is him being the role of a butt monkey, you know him getting destroyed all the time over and over again. Yup. Just have him in 1-2 campaigns where he's confused, on a militia, in the line of fire and surrounded by allied from all sides.
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Jul 20, 2016 6:58:41 GMT
Could you add Paul von Hidenburg as a better version of Erich von Falkenhayn or...a potential replacement for Erich von Falkenhayn if there's too many German generals. Update the list please if you will? Why not both I feel like the current list will lead to lack of space available for other countries at some point like the Ottomans or Russia.
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jul 20, 2016 6:59:30 GMT
Why not both I feel like the current list will lead to lack of space available for other countries at some point like the Ottomans or Russia. Enver Pasha anyone?
|
|