|
Post by dain on Aug 25, 2015 6:51:20 GMT
I have access to emblems so I got top tier suvorov instead but many players in the forum do medal generals only (no emblems) and Dobeln is probably the best medal general. I don't get it. For tier 2 generals, you need both medals and emblems, don't you? Or you could spend either 870 medals or 3 emblems for Döbeln?
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Aug 25, 2015 9:29:12 GMT
I have access to emblems so I got top tier suvorov instead but many players in the forum do medal generals only (no emblems) and Dobeln is probably the best medal general. I don't get it. For tier 2 generals, you need both medals and emblems, don't you? Or you could spend either 870 medals or 3 emblems for Döbeln? Fortunately, it's either medals or emblems, not both.
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Aug 26, 2015 21:20:42 GMT
Survov imo but i cant afford him Dammit
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Sept 21, 2015 15:34:39 GMT
Just bought Suvorov with RL money. He's the Best general in real life and in-game. In real life, he never lost. Ever. But, I am just too lazy to complete conquests and get Victoria or Kate Upton or Fatimah and all the other princesses. Too much work.
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 7, 2015 3:08:24 GMT
I really like Lannes. He saved me in alot of campaigns and does a very good job in combination with Cavalry. And please Suvorov don't throw stones at me but Jean Lannes>Alexander Suvorov
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Oct 7, 2015 14:05:50 GMT
I really like Lannes. He saved me in alot of campaigns and does a very good job in combination with Cavalry. And please Suvorov don't throw stones at me but Jean Lannes>Alexander Suvorov I'm going to gather stones. I'll be back...
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 7, 2015 14:11:22 GMT
I will help. Mountbatten is the better than Lannes AT LEAST
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Oct 7, 2015 14:23:49 GMT
I will help. Mountbatten is the better than Lannes AT LEAST Exactly! And that while Mountbatten was a Navy Admiral....
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Oct 7, 2015 15:29:51 GMT
Lannes is obvious the best infantry general of all times I think:
-Mass Fire: Even when the unit has 1 health it keeps attacking like it has all it's health. (Troop vitality does not influence attack and defence) -Leadership: Fully surrounded and no food, no problem! (Morale stays the same.) -Geography: Enemy is behind the mount Everest, do not worry we will climb over it! (Terrain does not affect the movement of a unit) -Assault Art: cavalry incomming, Assault Art= insta kill -> 120-180 damage on MG
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 7, 2015 16:36:29 GMT
I have to give Suvourov best infantry award. All 4 abilities are good infantry skills to have.
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Oct 7, 2015 17:04:16 GMT
Lannes is obvious the best infantry general of all times I think: -Mass Fire: Even when the unit has 1 health it keeps attacking like it has all it's health. (Troop vitality does not influence attack and defence) -Leadership: Fully surrounded and no food, no problem! (Morale stays the same.) -Geography: Enemy is behind the mount Everest, do not worry we will climb over it! (Terrain does not affect the movement of a unit) -Assault Art: cavalry incomming, Assault Art= insta kill -> 120-180 damage on MG What I found in the library at my university, is that Lannes' equals are Davout and Masséna. Suvorov defeated Masséna: He could defeat the others. Regarding his "skills":You can't have everything. He has exceptionally good infantry skills: Assault art is always used when I don't need it. Regarding Geography skill: I just give Suvorov some boots.
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Oct 7, 2015 17:49:43 GMT
Lannes is obvious the best infantry general of all times I think: -Mass Fire: Even when the unit has 1 health it keeps attacking like it has all it's health. (Troop vitality does not influence attack and defence) -Leadership: Fully surrounded and no food, no problem! (Morale stays the same.) -Geography: Enemy is behind the mount Everest, do not worry we will climb over it! (Terrain does not affect the movement of a unit) -Assault Art: cavalry incomming, Assault Art= insta kill -> 120-180 damage on MG Geography skill is useless because infantry move is not hindered by terrain. Leadership skill is almost useless because, unlike cavalry that makes multiple kills, infantry has very few reasons to get into the middle of enemy troops. That leaves Lannes with only 2 useful skills, Mass Fire and Assault Art. He does not have important skills like Bugle, formation, or infantry tactic. He is kinda inferior to Victoria or Brock. Let alone Suvorov.
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 7, 2015 19:59:05 GMT
Let's just agree on one thing, Jean Lannes and Alexander Suvorov would destroy every army if combinated. And as a response to Suvorov I'm going to change my name to "Lannes" for a week.
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 8, 2015 5:30:54 GMT
Let's just agree on one thing, Jean Lannes and Alexander Suvorov would destroy every army if combinated. And as a response to Suvorov I'm going to change my name to "Lannes" for a week. k me going to döbeln then, he is a 3/4 suvorov
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Oct 8, 2015 5:37:20 GMT
Let's just agree on one thing, Jean Lannes and Alexander Suvorov would destroy every army if combinated. And as a response to Suvorov I'm going to change my name to "Lannes" for a week. As a response to Lannes, I am going to changemy name to "Suvorov" for one week
|
|