|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 8, 2015 9:41:42 GMT
Let's just agree on one thing, Jean Lannes and Alexander Suvorov would destroy every army if combinated. And as a response to Suvorov I'm going to change my name to "Lannes" for a week. As a response to Lannes, I am going to changemy name to "Suvorov" for one week you don't say  |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Nov 24, 2015 14:01:30 GMT
For Lannes, I doubt if Geography and Leadership are very useful since as an infantry, you don't need to go into the middle of enemies like cavalries do and your movement is not impaired by the terrain. As saltin mentions, Victoria movement gives her an edge. With 4 stars in movement, she can move 3 grids with machine gun. It will be hard for me to forgive you for what you said. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 24, 2015 14:40:35 GMT
For Lannes, I doubt if Geography and Leadership are very useful since as an infantry, you don't need to go into the middle of enemies like cavalries do and your movement is not impaired by the terrain. As saltin mentions, Victoria movement gives her an edge. With 4 stars in movement, she can move 3 grids with machine gun. It will be hard for me to forgive you for what you said. Have you actually used Lannes in EW4? I have been using him recently. His damage and movement are TERRIBLE. I'm not lying either. I would rather be using Suvorov as he has more movement and damage. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Nov 24, 2015 14:48:13 GMT
It will be hard for me to forgive you for what you said. Have you actually used Lannes in EW4? I have been using him recently. His damage and movement are TERRIBLE. I'm not lying either. I would rather be using Suvorov as he has more movement and damage. They have same movement and you can at least use Lannes on something else than infantry while Suvorov is infantry only |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Nov 24, 2015 14:55:00 GMT
Leadership is not useless at all! Lannes is top defender of cities. Once I let (of course I meant to) 50 Russian troops beleaguer Paris. Then I put Double MG with Lannes on it in Paris. Lannes is rather a more defending the attacking cavalry general. That is what infantry is meant for. Defending and clearing up enemies, because you can let the horses to the real charge task. Lannes is no doubt the best  |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 24, 2015 16:38:29 GMT
Well I am reverting back to using Suvorov.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 24, 2015 16:45:41 GMT
It's just a matter of preference. ..
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 24, 2015 16:58:12 GMT
Ww3 will be that is lannes better or suvorov |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Nov 24, 2015 17:29:46 GMT
i just found out that infantry is 5% slower in desert area. That means Geography isn't completely useless but tbh nobody would invade N Africa with Lannes if you could use him against Russia/France
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Men on Dec 12, 2015 13:32:12 GMT
I have Archduke. C he is powerful because he is five star in training and infantry. He is three star in movement and three star in business. His stats are: nobleman, banner, strike and bugle. He cost 8 Royal Emblems.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 12, 2015 14:06:48 GMT
I have Archduke. C he is powerful because he is five star in training and infantry. He is three star in movement and three star in business. His stats are: nobleman, banner, strike and bugle. He cost 8 Royal Emblems. There are much better generals than Archduke. He can be a business/infantry general if you get some business trainers though. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 12, 2015 18:45:22 GMT
I have Archduke. C he is powerful because he is five star in training and infantry. He is three star in movement and three star in business. His stats are: nobleman, banner, strike and bugle. He cost 8 Royal Emblems. There are much better generals than Archduke. He can be a business/infantry general if you get some business trainers though. Archduke C. is not our choice, but it doesn't mean that he is weak. Actually I only feel that Suchet, Cotton, Blucher, Barclay and Alexander I are weak tier-3. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 12, 2015 19:11:36 GMT
Didn't say he was weak. By the way, isn't Brock in tier 3? I remember seeing him there. He is just terrible. I don't know what EasyTech was thinking when they made these guys tier 3. Maybe they were thinking more about how famous the generals were not how strong they were in the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Dec 12, 2015 19:40:26 GMT
Didn't say he was weak. By the way, isn't Brock in tier 3? I remember seeing him there. He is just terrible. I don't know what EasyTech was thinking when they made these guys tier 3. Maybe they were thinking more about how famous the generals were not how strong they were in the game. Brock? I feel that he is fine with Bugle+Assault Art. Plus, Brock in 1812 America is stronger. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Dec 12, 2015 20:04:00 GMT
Bugle and Assualt art in tier 3? Tier 2 would be better for him
|
|
