|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 4:37:07 GMT
Victoria:
Infantry: ***
Navy: ****
Trade: ***
Move: ****
Training: *****
Skills:
Assault Art
Defense Art
Mass Fire
Bugle
Good output, top of the line Survivability (Mass Fire+Defense Art+5 Training Stars), good movement. Assault Art+Defense Art make her the Queen of S&L, as well as a good Navy Gen. As Infantry, she's at a medium between Suvororv's high output and no adaptability, and Lannes' high flexibility and lower output. Survivability competes with Washington. A keeper, if you have 6 slots.
A+ General
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 7:08:13 GMT
Napoleon:
Infantry: ***
Cavalry: ***
Artillery: ******
Fort: ***
Trade: ***
Navy: **
Training: ***
Move: ***
Skills:
Banner
Siege Master
Engineering
Infantry Tactics
So many stars! Shiny! But don't be fooled, his skills don't go together. One might say he's the Leeb of EW4. Furthermore, stars can be trained but skills cannot, so he is further inferior to other Generals. Don't buy him.
1.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 7:25:11 GMT
Agha:
Cavalry: **
Move: *
Cavalry Trainer
375 medals
He cannot take the Heat of the Battlefield. Lucky for him, he's the cheapest Cav trainer.
F, but Blue FT level
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 7:31:51 GMT
Archduke Charles
Infantry: *****
Cavalry: *
Artillery: ***
Fort: **
Trade: ***
Move: ***
Training: *****
Nobleman
Banner
Strike
Bugle
Bugle, 5* Infantry, and 5* Training...where else do I see these features? Suvorov, and even he ain't that good.
Bugle, Strike, and Banner...Sakurako.
Nobleman? Worthless skill.
Everything he does, others do better. Not recommeded
1.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 7:40:07 GMT
Radetzky
Infantry: ***
Cavalry: ****
Artillery: **
Navy: *
Fort: **
Trade: ****
Move: ***
Training: ****
Strike
Surprise
Defense Art
War Master.
Strike, Surprise, and Defense Art are a Solid Combo. So solid, in fact, that Dombrowski also has it. Sadly for Radetzky, Dombrowski is cheapear than him by 2 emblems. Radetzky's 4th training star is not enough to save him from Dombrowski.
3, but only because Dombrowski
|
|
|
|
Post by granny's terror on Sept 24, 2016 7:56:48 GMT
This is awesome!By this thread,we can know which generals are better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 24, 2016 10:58:34 GMT
One for ARCHDUKE RADETZKY NAPOLEON?!?!?!?!?!?!? Then Jackson should be -1?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 15:50:04 GMT
One for ARCHDUKE RADETZKY NAPOLEON?!?!?!?!?!?!? Then Jackson should be -1? I will adjust my scale to distinguish Radetzky from Jackson |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 24, 2016 15:58:43 GMT
One for ARCHDUKE RADETZKY NAPOLEON?!?!?!?!?!?!? Then Jackson should be -1? I will adjust my scale to distinguish Radetzky from Jackson How about 4 scales: 1st: OP, just OP, worth your paying and regrouping. 2nd: solid, decent ability, but by some weaknesses they are not enough to be OP. 3rd: normal, not too special comparing to 1 and 2, but still fine to use, not too weak. 4th: way too weak, do not consider them at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 16:02:21 GMT
I will adjust my scale to distinguish Radetzky from Jackson How about 4 scales: 1st: OP, just OP, worth your paying and regrouping. 2nd: solid, decent ability, but by some weaknesses they are not enough to be OP. 3rd: normal, not too special comparing to 1 and 2, but still fine to use, not too weak. 4th: way too weak, do not consider them at all. How is the new scale (1st post, edited)? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 16:32:40 GMT
Merveldt
Infantry: *
Cavalry: ****
Trade: *
Move: ***
Training: *
Disguise
Move Trainer
Mobility
770 medals.
Diez with 1 bonus cav star, but is a cav star on a trainer you will throw away really worth 230 more medals? If you wanted him for combat, get Dumouriez
Not recommended.
D
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 24, 2016 17:07:14 GMT
How about 4 scales: 1st: OP, just OP, worth your paying and regrouping. 2nd: solid, decent ability, but by some weaknesses they are not enough to be OP. 3rd: normal, not too special comparing to 1 and 2, but still fine to use, not too weak. 4th: way too weak, do not consider them at all. How is the new scale (1st post, edited)? Pretty good, but there are two things. 1. How do we count the effect of training? 2. some decent tier-3 generals are replaceable by elite princess or even top ranked tier-2 generals, how do you count that? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 17:10:34 GMT
How is the new scale (1st post, edited)? Pretty good, but there are two things. 1. How do we count the effect of training? 2. some decent tier-3 generals are replaceable by elite princess or even top ranked tier-2 generals, how do you count that? 1. Generals with low stars but good skills are ranked more favorably 2. I rank them more poorly. Radetzky has low rank because of Dombrowski, and Lasalle will be ranked unfavorably due to Golitsyn |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 24, 2016 17:13:09 GMT
Pretty good, but there are two things. 1. How do we count the effect of training? 2. some decent tier-3 generals are replaceable by elite princess or even top ranked tier-2 generals, how do you count that? 1. Generals with low stars but good skills are ranked more favorably 2. I rank them more poorly. Radetzky has low rank because of Dombrowski, and Lasalle will be ranked unfavorably due to Golitsyn 1. Even if it is untrainable training stars? 2. Suvorov will cry then.  |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Sept 24, 2016 17:14:16 GMT
1. Generals with low stars but good skills are ranked more favorably 2. I rank them more poorly. Radetzky has low rank because of Dombrowski, and Lasalle will be ranked unfavorably due to Golitsyn 1. Even if it is untrainable training stars? 2. Suvorov will cry then. 1. I look at Training Stars like a skill. 2. Suvorov will cringe at his rating, so would Jean Lannes |
|
