|
|
Post by Marshal Hugh Dowding on Dec 27, 2016 23:58:02 GMT
Guys dont question them on history and geography, they are making the history of planetery Easytech, not earth.
|
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Jan 16, 2017 2:23:20 GMT
I really feel like this thread needs to be revived for the new update.
I have not upgraded to Industrial yet, but I've seen screenshots of the conquest.
Italy is German? (Was actually against germany)
Balkans are German? (much of the region was Anti, though Bulgaria fought on the German side)
Angkor is still around, instead of being french, but Indonesia and Philippines are British. I guess if no dutch in game indonesia makes sense, but Philippines should be American. I guess if used as a General spawn point it could make a USA conquest faster though. (Note-Conquest of Philippines actually happened before Japanese took Korea, yet Korea is japanese)
USA has penetrated into South America. I can understand that, and even Spain being there. But British controlling the west? I don't think thats accurate at all. I think it would make so much more sense for leaving the Inca there, since Easy-tech has already used them to represent Latin-Americans.
Austria has atrophied. Clearly Germany was increased in such a stupid fashion to make it a three star country. Then Absorb Austria why don't you? Though to be honest that would be worse than it is now.
Anyway, It feels to me like Easy-tech did all this just to make a deadline. However, Didn't they have plenty of time? I guess making a WW1 map would be harder than we think, but it shouldn't have ended up like this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Conrad von Hotzendorf on Jan 20, 2017 15:44:09 GMT
English transport ships have cannons in classical age. I'm personally fine with the inclusion of mythical leaders but when Robin Hood is in the classical age instead of medieval I do get a bit annoyed. He could have been replaced by someone like Boudicca.
|
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Mar 10, 2017 11:20:47 GMT
One of the most irritating to me is natives and colonists have same tier units (I know it's game purpose but still). And Angkor should be gone by Discovery age.
Also this might not account into inaccuracies, but i don't understand why there are mission names like "Nanyang Battle" and "Battle of Beihai". The latter don't even have China at all (they should have named it "Battle of North Sea" and it'd sounds very good).
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Mar 10, 2017 12:35:55 GMT
English transport ships have cannons in classical age. I'm personally fine with the inclusion of mythical leaders but when Robin Hood is in the classical age instead of medieval I do get a bit annoyed. He could have been replaced by someone like Boudicca. What other guy who uses a bow is famous in England and lives early on? |
|
|
|
Post by cardbattler on Mar 10, 2017 17:06:39 GMT
English transport ships have cannons in classical age. I'm personally fine with the inclusion of mythical leaders but when Robin Hood is in the classical age instead of medieval I do get a bit annoyed. He could have been replaced by someone like Boudicca. What other guy who uses a bow is famous in England and lives early on? Sir Tristan of the Round Table? lol Speaking of it, King Arthur would make a good ruler of Britain in Classical lol. Historically Boudica fits the most anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Mar 10, 2017 17:17:22 GMT
What other guy who uses a bow is famous in England and lives early on? Sir Tristan of the Round Table? lol Speaking of it, King Arthur would make a good ruler of Britain in Classical lol. Historically Boudica fits the most anyway. King Arthur is like 800s, still Medieval, 300 years after Rome. (Byzantine does not count, otherwise Rome never ends until just before the renaissance) Since he is legendary, makes sense, but its medieval legendary, not classical. Boudica definitely fits, as she resisted the Romans, and in classical conquest England is independent and an inevitable enemy of the Romans. I think it would be cool if they added the medieval German cities. Those would be the Germanic barbarians, who also own Dublin (Ireland) and Glasgow (Scotland) Manchester and London would be Roman instead of English, as happened historically. Thus the Barbarians would be fighting Rome from Italy to Hadrians Wall (England) as happened historically. It would even Segue into Medieval, as we can assume the Barbarians won the war in England. I think this Idea for adding the Germans, Quintus Fabius might appreciate. |
|
|
|
Post by Thrawn on Mar 10, 2017 18:34:16 GMT
 Tanks in the US war of independence. Nice one easytech This reminds me of European War 4 armoured cars and ironclads which did not even exist in the Napoleonic Wars. |
|
|
|
Post by Thrawn on Mar 10, 2017 18:37:27 GMT
Like most of you guys, I questioned Robin Hood, Beowulf and Hua Mulan existences when I first started the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by TK421 on Mar 10, 2017 19:05:54 GMT
Easy Tech should really look at this thread and fix those things...cause some things are just wrong. Tanks in the America-...No. Just no.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 10, 2017 19:37:03 GMT
Easytech is trying hard to general amount to be exactly 100, including those AI guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Mar 11, 2017 4:57:23 GMT
Apparently Columbus and Tercios are both Dutch.
Source: Koxinga Campaign
|
|
|
|
Post by Quintus Fabius on Mar 11, 2017 5:11:24 GMT
Apparently Columbus and Tercios are both Dutch. Source: Koxinga Campaign Columbus was Genovese turned Spanish, Spain ruled Netherlands for a while before the 80yw, therefore the Dutch have Columbus. QED. |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Apr 24, 2017 14:40:54 GMT
How many "Immortal" rulers in the game's conquest actually have descendants with the same name?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Apr 24, 2017 14:56:56 GMT
"Commander, now you are on to lead"
|
|
.jpg)
