|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Sept 29, 2015 9:36:20 GMT
This story by Mountbatten might explain why does grouchy appear in the Waterloo campaign in ew4 (as the French), he is still guarding Napoleon from Prussians even in 2015 lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Sept 29, 2015 10:00:20 GMT
I watched a documentary on Napoleon and it was very interesting thanks to EW4. It feels good to actually recognize names. That's what it talked about for a while though, Grouchy's incompetence
|
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Sept 29, 2015 12:03:24 GMT
I watched a documentary on Napoleon and it was very interesting thanks to EW4. It feels good to actually recognize names. That's what it talked about for a while though, Grouchy's incompetence Easytech finest educational contributions to the world:enabling historical name recognition! That's fine but whatever you do,don't let them try to teach you geography (like the shape or position of countries) or general history for that matter! Their version of these is based on an alternate reality  |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Sept 29, 2015 12:24:11 GMT
Oh yeah I figured that out by now lol
|
|
|
|
Post by grayfoxcz on Oct 1, 2015 12:57:47 GMT
I am surprised noone mentioned Sulkowski tier 2 w/ 4* in cav and strike/spy/trainer
|
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Oct 2, 2015 5:11:59 GMT
Sulkowski is good. But, unlike Golytsin who is different, Sulkowski basically is Ney without Siege Master so if you need to make a choice then Ney is superior.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 20, 2015 13:41:07 GMT
Why Portugal 1806? If you are looking for princesses, that won't get you anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 20, 2015 17:22:45 GMT
Oh no doubt it would be fun, it's just a strange goal to have. If it's for the sake of having fun then by all means...
|
|
|
|
Post by kanue on Oct 20, 2015 18:12:50 GMT
Why Portugal 1806? If you are looking for princesses, that won't get you anything. Why not? It looks like it could be an interesting battle. Larger red countries as allies and I can use all my generals. Just have to roll across Spain, Italy, Ottoman empire, parts of N. Africa...the whole bottom of the map. Should be fun.  I also like playing small country because they are fun and I can use more generals. But if you want to get elilte princesses, you need to play big country in order to finish the campaign as fast as possible. Regarding your progress, it looks good. Your line-up are strong.  |
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Oct 21, 2015 12:40:21 GMT
I watched a documentary on Napoleon and it was very interesting thanks to EW4. It feels good to actually recognize names. That's what it talked about for a while though, Grouchy's incompetence Did it also say something about Marshal Ney's cavalry charge on Wellington's lines? Because if it did so. they'd talk about his incompetence |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 21, 2015 12:53:17 GMT
I remember something about British soldiers forming a box to defend against cavalry. All I heard about Ney was how he help Napoleon stage his coup
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Oct 21, 2015 13:59:25 GMT
Thanks kanue. I guess I wasn't thinking about winning princesses and free generals so much. So, why are large countries better for getting princesses? I mean, does the larger size automatically mean a shorter number of turns for the win, or is there something else? It's just because with smaller countries You can't attack several battle-fronts at the same time. Consequently can't expand and improve the economy fast. |
|
|
|
Post by sirlycosid on May 10, 2018 2:39:40 GMT
Well, Grouchy not being there was mainly because of a very unclear order from Soult, which is why he was like, 9 miles away at Wavre. he didn't get killed by Blucher though what are you talking about
|
|
|
|
Post by sirlycosid on May 10, 2018 2:40:20 GMT
Sorry if I seem rude I'm just a very factual person |
|
|
|
Post by Iosef Stalin on Aug 28, 2018 20:38:15 GMT
I think there is already a thread, but I use Radetzky and Berthier. I am too lazy to upgrade him to 5 at cav (4* cav 3* movement).
|
|
