|
Post by Tariq ibn Ziyad on Nov 27, 2016 0:53:57 GMT
I think they has a script about the conquest. I meant script = if you use Axis, Germany is not a beast; if you use Allies, Germany is a beast. Also your allies is easier to fall.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Nov 27, 2016 0:58:25 GMT
That's just that allies are programmed to be dumber than enemies.
|
|
|
Post by Erwin Johannes Eugen Rommel on Nov 27, 2016 1:48:28 GMT
That's just that allies are programmed to be dumber than enemies. I still don't get the "dumber" part. The change is too negligible for the eye to see.
|
|
huehue
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 13
|
Post by huehue on Nov 27, 2016 3:12:08 GMT
Your Allies produce less troops and don't attack as much.
|
|
|
Post by Max Otto von Stierlitz on Nov 27, 2016 12:30:03 GMT
Haven't paid attention to it, but when I autofarmed Spain 1939 with low tech and only Bado, Germany vs USSR was about 50/50 and whether Germany will be beast or not depended on if it kills USSR's art gens or they will kill German gens.
|
|
|
Post by Tariq ibn Ziyad on Nov 28, 2016 7:47:44 GMT
There is two chance for USSR : 1. They'll spawn Zhukov and Konev, then marching towards Germany (and fail in West Poland/Germany) 2. They'll not spawn any gens. Defensive, very...
|
|
|
Post by Tariq ibn Ziyad on Nov 28, 2016 7:50:15 GMT
There are two chances for German Nazi : 1. They will invade Western/Eastern Europe and Britain 2. Their Blitzkrieg doesn't work at Poland. Soviets will take offensive
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2016 16:52:13 GMT
It's important to remember that this is a game and by no means intended to be accurate. This is supposed to take actual historic events and make them into a fun game. If all of it was supposed to be accurate, Operation Barbarossa would not be a campaign mission.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Dec 5, 2016 0:30:09 GMT
It's important to remember that this is a game and by no means intended to be accurate. This is supposed to take actual historic events and make them into a fun game. If all of it was supposed to be accurate, Operation Barbarossa would not be a campaign mission. And why wouldn't it be one?
|
|
|
Post by Der Kaiserreich on Dec 5, 2016 0:43:37 GMT
It's important to remember that this is a game and by no means intended to be accurate. This is supposed to take actual historic events and make them into a fun game. If all of it was supposed to be accurate, Operation Barbarossa would not be a campaign mission. And why wouldn't it be one? I'm guessing because Operation Barbarossa failed halfway, but the plan and the mission in the game reached Moscow and won.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2016 2:49:53 GMT
It's important to remember that this is a game and by no means intended to be accurate. This is supposed to take actual historic events and make them into a fun game. If all of it was supposed to be accurate, Operation Barbarossa would not be a campaign mission. And why wouldn't it be one? Because the mission requires the capture of Moscow, something that never happened.
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Dec 5, 2016 3:11:10 GMT
And why wouldn't it be one? Because the mission requires the capture of Moscow, something that never happened. Well, by that logic, no mission should ever depict the losing side.
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Dec 5, 2016 3:49:16 GMT
And why wouldn't it be one? Because the mission requires the capture of Moscow, something that never happened. hmm, but Barbarossa's goal was to take moscow, or so I understand, so it falls within mission parameters. Also, during the operation invasion forces actually reached the city outskirts, so to take the city is to me a minor yet decisive alternate history. Pretty sure operation sea lion occurs before this Perhaps they could have added another mission, to represent the huge scale of the Eastern front (Is there another mission about this, I remember there being a Kursk?)
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Dec 5, 2016 4:32:56 GMT
Because the mission requires the capture of Moscow, something that never happened. hmm, but Barbarossa's goal was to take moscow, or so I understand, so it falls within mission parameters. Also, during the operation invasion forces actually reached the city outskirts, so to take the city is to me a minor yet decisive alternate history. Pretty sure operation sea lion occurs before this Perhaps they could have added another mission, to represent the huge scale of the Eastern front (Is there another mission about this, I remember there being a Kursk?) Kursk is only in allies
|
|
|
Post by Commander Vinnie on Dec 10, 2016 21:25:25 GMT
1939 -Axis powers don't have much territory,but they have enough power.Germany will be attacked by all allied countries,so I suggest you Japan or Italy,as they are almost ignored by every country.The first 10 rounds your ally will play better than the enemy.
1943-Axis powers are at their greatest extent,but they are "weakened",and I suggest you to play as U.K as they have good territories to lay on.The Soviets are also weak on the stage as they march their troops to the west,leaving their cities unprotected,and victims to Japanese Empire.
|
|