|
|
Post by Erich von Ludendorff on Jul 11, 2017 15:33:15 GMT
(That moment when your state joined a country, but never gets involved in revolutions because we're too busy selling oranges and collecting money from tourist's, slowly becoming a monopoly that will rule the world...) Singapore? |
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jul 11, 2017 15:54:33 GMT
(That moment when your state joined a country, but never gets involved in revolutions because we're too busy selling oranges and collecting money from tourist's, slowly becoming a monopoly that will rule the world...) Singapore? I definitely should know the reference, but it is not Singapore. We left the Malaysian Federation on 9th August 1965. |
|
|
|
Post by Laurent de Gouvion on Jul 16, 2017 14:34:27 GMT
(That moment when your state joined a country, but never gets involved in revolutions because we're too busy selling oranges and collecting money from tourist's, slowly becoming a monopoly that will rule the world...) Hong Kong? Apparently it is the 11th largest orange exporter, admirable given its land mass. |
|
|
|
Post by honotenshi on Jul 17, 2017 17:31:16 GMT
Florida. ^-^
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Ludendorff on Jul 17, 2017 18:45:25 GMT
can not into relevant can into space |
|
|
|
Post by Ivan Kolev on Jul 17, 2017 19:49:38 GMT
American Revolution by far.
Second would either be the Texan Revolution or the Latin American Revolutions. Hard to say because the Texans were a great story, a people who came west to get a new life only to decide to follow in their fore fathers in the American Revolution by fighting for independence from the tyranny under Santa Anna until the Texans under General Houston defeated them at San Jacinto. Simon Bolivar was also a great story though, with him crossing the Andes Mountains with his men and, against all odds, taking control of the Viceroyaltys of Peru and New Granada while José de San Martin and Bernardo O'Higgins liberated Chile and Argentina from foreign rule as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by TurkichBall on Jul 24, 2017 16:04:40 GMT
Turkish Revolution is best!
|
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Aug 5, 2017 21:17:08 GMT
American Revolution by far. Second would either be the Texan Revolution or the Latin American Revolutions. Hard to say because the Texans were a great story, a people who came west to get a new life only to decide to follow in their fore fathers in the American Revolution by fighting for independence from the tyranny under Santa Anna until the Texans under General Houston defeated them at San Jacinto. Simon Bolivar was also a great story though, with him crossing the Andes Mountains with his men and, against all odds, taking control of the Viceroyaltys of Peru and New Granada while José de San Martin and Bernardo O'Higgins liberated Chile and Argentina from foreign rule as well. Note: Santa Anna was a man😂 |
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Aug 5, 2017 21:29:06 GMT
Revolution of songs, while very few people died or were injured during it, most of the action was freeing Baltic states from Molotovs-Ribentrops pact with mostly songs and diplomacy although there were some military operations and some real action like chases and fire fights, it turned out in less of a conflict than people could hope for, as you may know there were 5 meter high barricades in Riga, Vilnius, Tallin and other important Baltic cities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Aug 5, 2017 21:40:31 GMT
Revolution of songs, while very few people died or were injured during it, most of the action was freeing Baltic states from Molotovs-Ribentrops pact with mostly songs and diplomacy although there were some military operations and some real action like chases and fire fights, it turned out in less of a conflict than people could hope for, as you may know there were 5 meter high barricades in Riga, Vilnius, Tallin and other important Baltic cities. I looked up revolution of songs in three different search engines and nothing came up. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Aug 5, 2017 21:42:55 GMT
Revolution of songs, while very few people died or were injured during it, most of the action was freeing Baltic states from Molotovs-Ribentrops pact with mostly songs and diplomacy although there were some military operations and some real action like chases and fire fights, it turned out in less of a conflict than people could hope for, as you may know there were 5 meter high barricades in Riga, Vilnius, Tallin and other important Baltic cities. If you mean the singing revolution in the baltics it had nothing to do with the M-R Pact. In fact it happened in the 80s. |
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Aug 5, 2017 21:45:18 GMT
Revolution of songs, while very few people died or were injured during it, most of the action was freeing Baltic states from Molotovs-Ribentrops pact with mostly songs and diplomacy although there were some military operations and some real action like chases and fire fights, it turned out in less of a conflict than people could hope for, as you may know there were 5 meter high barricades in Riga, Vilnius, Tallin and other important Baltic cities. If you mean the singing revolution in the baltics it had nothing to do with the M-R Pact. In fact it happened in the 80s. It is directly bound with it, because of the M-R pact Baltic states were under soviet occupation until 1990/91 |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Aug 5, 2017 21:46:34 GMT
If you mean the singing revolution in the baltics it had nothing to do with the M-R Pact. In fact it happened in the 80s. It is directly bound with it, because of the M-R pact Baltic states were under soviet occupation until 1990/91 Thats like saying that world war 2 happened because of holy rome because germany was where holy rome was for a while :/ |
|
|
|
Post by The Light Bringer on Aug 5, 2017 21:53:09 GMT
It is directly bound with it, because of the M-R pact Baltic states were under soviet occupation until 1990/91 Thats like saying that world war 2 happened because of holy rome because germany was where holy rome was for a while :/ No it's not, it is how things happened, while france was occupied only once in ww2, Baltic states were occupied 3 times, 1st occupation by ussr(1940-1941), German occupation(1941-1945(in some parts of Latvia)) and second soviet occupation 1943(in some parts from 1944 or 1945, after that there was a partisan war for a decade)-1991 |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck Jr on Aug 5, 2017 21:54:41 GMT
Thats like saying that world war 2 happened because of holy rome because germany was where holy rome was for a while :/ No it's not, it is how things happened, while france was occupied only once in ww2, Baltic states were occupied 3 times, 1st occupation by ussr(1940-1941), German occupation(1941-1945(in some parts of Latvia)) and second soviet occupation 1943(in some parts from 1944 or 1945, after that there was a partisan war for a decade)-1991 Going by that logic because Ireland was conquered more than once we can directly blame IRA terrorism on the formation of Argyll. They have nothing to do with each other. |
|
