|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 6, 2016 22:07:15 GMT
Guys guys guys, I gotta intervene now, the topic has been derailed enough, it was the easytech's historical mistakes but now it has completely turned to politics I'll ask everyone to please stop this political chat and carry on with the on topic material The thread is dead anyways so it doesnt matter true, and this is coming from the OP |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 6, 2016 22:07:32 GMT
Okey I just stop so I dont get banned  We should all stop somewere |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 6, 2016 22:57:00 GMT
Yeah, and back to something I said earlier, China should not be on the same team as Sovjet Union in 1950. Just because they share the same ideology doesn't that they like eachother, in some cases yes, but I fear its more advanced than that. for example Mao Zedong (Leader in China during cold war) Would prefer trading with USA than Sovjet Union, and they actually became good trading partners. Americans or Chinese dont actually realize how reliant they are to eachother, and USA would suffer if there were no China, and the other way around. Currently China is owning the market. When people thinks about the cold war they think of USA vs Russia and China, but in reality China hated Russia, and they thought they were a too powerful country. Fear leads to hate, China hated that Sovjet Union had a huge military, and favored USA for a demilitarized zone agreement between USA and USSR. Pure History, no politics: Maoist China maintained close ties with the USSR until the so-called Sino-Soviet Split, which became a full-fledged tear between the two in 1961, and led to Nixon's Historic visit in the PRC in 1972. All History, no politics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Soviet_split |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 6, 2016 23:00:27 GMT
Yeah but that was in 1961 which was after 1950 (when WC3 conquest starts) so it makes sense for China to be on USSR's side in 1950 at least.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 6, 2016 23:09:40 GMT
Yeah but that was in 1961 which was after 1950 (when WC3 conquest starts) so it makes sense for China to be on USSR's side in 1950 at least. Yes, indeed it does. Let's leave it at that and not let this topic approach a flame war again. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 7, 2016 0:32:39 GMT
As I've said to Archduke Charles, this comment is replaceable by a like button. Just for future reference |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 4:49:12 GMT
Yeah, and back to something I said earlier, China should not be on the same team as Sovjet Union in 1950. Just because they share the same ideology doesn't that they like eachother, in some cases yes, but I fear its more advanced than that. for example Mao Zedong (Leader in China during cold war) Would prefer trading with USA than Sovjet Union, and they actually became good trading partners. Americans or Chinese dont actually realize how reliant they are to eachother, and USA would suffer if there were no China, and the other way around. Currently China is owning the market. When people thinks about the cold war they think of USA vs Russia and China, but in reality China hated Russia, and they thought they were a too powerful country. Fear leads to hate, China hated that Sovjet Union had a huge military, and favored USA for a demilitarized zone agreement between USA and USSR. Pure History, no politics: Maoist China maintained close ties with the USSR until the so-called Sino-Soviet Split, which became a full-fledged tear between the two in 1961, and led to Nixon's Historic visit in the PRC in 1972. All History, no politics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Soviet_splitBack at it again with the false claims Picard -.- |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 4:52:11 GMT
As I've said to Archduke Charles, this comment is replaceable by a like button. Just for future reference Your comment can be replaced by a like button. Just saying for future referance. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 7, 2016 4:52:17 GMT
Guys please don't start this again. There is no need. Seriosly stop.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 7, 2016 5:01:33 GMT
Pure History, no politics: Maoist China maintained close ties with the USSR until the so-called Sino-Soviet Split, which became a full-fledged tear between the two in 1961, and led to Nixon's Historic visit in the PRC in 1972. All History, no politics. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Soviet_splitBack at it again with the false claims Picard -.- How about you stop yelling "lies!" where there are none. Take a lesson in humility perhaps. Everyone makes mistakes: me, you, saltin himself. You made a mistake about History. I cited a source for information that showed it false. You accuse me of lying. If you're trying to start a flame war, you're damn close to doing it. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 7, 2016 5:04:24 GMT
As I've said to Archduke Charles , this comment is replaceable by a like button. Just for future reference Your comment can be replaced by a like button. Just saying for future referance. No, it could not. It was a piece of information that was not here, and I explained it to Frederick the Great. He took the etiquette lesson like a gentleman. I wish you'd do the same |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 7, 2016 5:09:06 GMT
I have tried to stay neutral in this but Jean-Luc Picard could not have told me this just with a like button, and if he didn't tell me it would be unfair because he told you. Jean-Luc Picard is clearly not just picking on you ( Archduke Charles) becuase he told me the same things. The rules are the same for everyone. And Archduke Charles don't claimb Jean-Luc Picard is lying when he provided proof and you did not. Now please for F***s sake stop this stupid bickering, I have had enough and I'm sure others have as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 7, 2016 5:13:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by saltin on Apr 7, 2016 9:00:07 GMT
Ok I think everyone had a chance to express themselves right? So now perhaps this thread can get on back on track,in that way no one will get formal warnings issued this time and we can keep a friendly tone.
Everyone needs to blow off steam now again and that's understandable but repeated or prolonged hostilies towards fellow gamers degrades our community and that isn't acceptable.
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Apr 7, 2016 9:57:30 GMT
|
|
