|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 11:38:29 GMT
Do you think Wikipedia tells the true story, there are alot of backstory they have forgotten. Just by looking by that does not necessary mean that USSR and China loved eachother until that split.
|
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 11:41:42 GMT
Yeah but that was in 1961 which was after 1950 (when WC3 conquest starts) so it makes sense for China to be on USSR's side in 1950 at least. Not really because a direct conflict between USA and Sovjet Union didn't happen, so theres no further discussion about this history, Wc3 is very misleading im afraid. |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 11:42:52 GMT
US fought Proxy wars, So did Russia, So did China, So did Nato.
|
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 7, 2016 12:18:22 GMT
I never said the US and USSR fought a real war in real life. I know they didn't
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 7, 2016 13:37:42 GMT
We'll see. I prefer a disarmament, but it's not just me here. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 7, 2016 13:41:30 GMT
US fought Proxy wars, So did Russia, So did China, So did Nato. In Korea, American and Soviet troops faced kff directly, and Soviets fought side-by-side with the PRC |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 13:45:51 GMT
Whats kff, anyway Sovjet Union would not fight against American troops directly. China did, so they really didn't fight alongside eachother, because China were mostly focused on liberating North Korea but that was because of Mao Of god damn Zedong.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 7, 2016 13:51:03 GMT
Whats kff, anyway Sovjet Union would not fight against American troops directly. China did, so they really didn't fight alongside eachother, because China were mostly focused on liberating North Korea but that was because of Mao Of god damn Zedong. The USSR was directly involved in the Korean war (boots on the ground) And point out my typos when you stop making them. |
|
|
|
Post by Archduke Charles on Apr 7, 2016 13:59:10 GMT
Wow stop being so obvious, now you are going to attack me for having typos thats a cowards move. And YES i know they were fighting in the korean war, I did explain that Sovjet Union would not fight against American troops directly but that does not mean that Sovjet Union would fight against South Korea, and maybe Fn suppliers.
And I was not pointing out that you wrote kff wrong I just did not know the definition of the word, Jesus man!
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Apr 7, 2016 19:28:26 GMT
Back to Easytech: They called Sidney Smith, Claude Victor-Perrin, Rowland Hill, and several other non-monarchs by their 1st names. They used "Cornplanter" ( General William T. Sherman can tell us if he was real) instead of Tecumseh in 1812. There's the Chicago/Fort Dearborn matter (I made a thread on that) Etc etc etc |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 7, 2016 22:58:48 GMT
Back to Easytech: They called Sidney Smith, Claude Victor-Perrin, Rowland Hill, and several other non-monarchs by their 1st names. They used "Cornplanter" ( General William T. Sherman can tell us if he was real) instead of Tecumseh in 1812. There's the Chicago/Fort Dearborn matter (I made a thread on that) Etc etc etc Yeah I always found that strange. Especially when Dearborn was in the same conquest as Fort Dearborn |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 3:16:39 GMT
Do you think Wikipedia tells the true story, there are alot of backstory they have forgotten. Just by looking by that does not necessary mean that USSR and China loved eachother until that split. A good example is looking at the Battle of Jena-Auerstedt. The German one states that France had a lot more troops than the Prussians and had about half as many losses. The English one is heavily in favour of French sources on the other hand. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Apr 8, 2016 3:17:30 GMT
Back to Easytech: They called Sidney Smith, Claude Victor-Perrin, Rowland Hill, and several other non-monarchs by their 1st names. They used "Cornplanter" ( General William T. Sherman can tell us if he was real) instead of Tecumseh in 1812. There's the Chicago/Fort Dearborn matter (I made a thread on that) Etc etc etc I knew Tecumseh was somewhere in the game. I'm guessing the useless Native general is his prophet brother?! |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 8, 2016 3:19:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 8, 2016 12:47:01 GMT
Why you no put Baltics or Pakistan easytech?! WHY YOU NO DO THIS?! you spoke my heart out (cries), WHYY EASYTECH, WHYYYY!!! anyways I want the baltic and mein vaterland (means my fatherland aka country) Actually the fatherland is the farmable area in central northern europe  |
|
