|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Nov 15, 2017 14:17:21 GMT
Maybe it was Historical accuracy? We know Axis *ALMOST* won in Europe, but they weren't doing as well in the Pacific once Allies sent their better forces to fight the Japs. True true. Still kind of mad they didnt show the battles of nanking and peking maybe due to political reasons Timeline wise, Nanking & Peking were before USA officially joined, so they're arguably not count as a part of the "War in the Pacific". Anyways, they'd have to create 2 more campaigns if the Invasion of China is involved, just like North America. It's destabilise their campaign count.
|
|
|
Post by Marshal Ney on Nov 18, 2017 20:27:10 GMT
10 votes for potatoes. People are strange!
|
|
|
Post by Leonid Govorov on Nov 19, 2017 0:09:48 GMT
10 votes for potatoes. People are strange!
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Nov 19, 2017 14:47:35 GMT
10 votes for potatoes. People are strange! Wait, you mean someone actually spent time from his life to create this? Hell, people are indeed very strange.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Nov 19, 2017 14:56:55 GMT
Just a wc4 noob here, but when I play axis it is much easier. Having. A easier time with FINLAND over the USSR.
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Nov 19, 2017 15:16:30 GMT
Just a wc4 noob here, but when I play axis it is much easier. Having. A easier time with FINLAND over the USSR. That's for Europe. In the pacific, allies are easier
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Nov 19, 2017 15:28:18 GMT
My Finland conquest, got a few artillery upgrades with that, good amount of medals. Used Patton Konev Manstein.
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Nov 19, 2017 15:36:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Minnesotaball on Nov 19, 2017 15:56:13 GMT
I very well might be, but however axis seems much easier in conquest too. I think campaigns are equal to me.
|
|
|
Post by Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb on Nov 19, 2017 16:03:58 GMT
I very well might be, but however axis seems much easier in conquest too. I think campaigns are equal to me. I agree to that.
|
|