|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 24, 2015 16:04:07 GMT
I'll be the U.S and I'll see how the war plays out and which side could give me the most benefits.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haelicon on Oct 24, 2015 16:06:53 GMT
Is this theoretical war battlegrounds restricted only to Korea and Manchuria or not restricted at all (entire world)?
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 24, 2015 16:13:31 GMT
Is this theoretical war battlegrounds restricted only to Korea and Manchuria or not restricted at all (entire world)? No, it would almost be like a premature WWI, only with Britain and France against each other instead of France and Britian against Germany. So, no it's not restricted at all. I will create a new thread for this scenario. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 24, 2015 16:17:50 GMT
Netherfreek can be in charge of the map. It would probably work using the same method that you used to create the thread Alternate Europe.
|
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 24, 2015 16:25:36 GMT
Yes, netherfreek can be whatever non-belligerent country they want.
|
|
|
|
Post by Haelicon on Oct 24, 2015 16:33:01 GMT
Then, I take Imperial Germany
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Oct 24, 2015 16:36:28 GMT
Japan is mine. I have pity with the one that will choose Russia.
*spoiler alert* They will get their asses kicked just like during the Battle of Tsushima.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 25, 2015 17:53:55 GMT
APPEAL
We need rules for a war like this (it's own rules drafted by Sherman, who introduced this war game here) and everyone will have to follow them
Not like nukes or I pop out of nowhere to wreck you and your allies stuff.
Without rules the result is in front of us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Oct 25, 2015 18:04:23 GMT
From the experience before, this wouldn't work. But let's try again  And ur right  it ended in terror and insults |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 25, 2015 18:04:02 GMT
APPEAL We need rules for a war like this (it's own rules drafted by Sherman, who introduced this war game here) and everyone will have to follow them Not like nukes or I pop out of nowhere to wreck you and your allies stuff. Without rules the result is in front of us. This is correct. We need the theoretical war community to aid the creation of these guidelines. Without guidelines, these theoretical wars won't work. |
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Oct 25, 2015 18:04:37 GMT
Japan is mine. I have pity with the one that will choose Russia. *spoiler alert* They will get their asses kicked just like during the Battle of Tsushima. True |
|
|
|
Post by Vatutin on Oct 25, 2015 18:05:15 GMT
APPEAL We need rules for a war like this (it's own rules drafted by Sherman, who introduced this war game here) and everyone will have to follow them Not like nukes or I pop out of nowhere to wreck you and your allies stuff. Without rules the result is in front of us. This is correct. We need the theoretical war community to aid the creation of these guidelines. Without guidelines, these theoretical wars won't work. And true I like an wwii theoretical war |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 25, 2015 18:09:08 GMT
I think we need the next war in ww2 but total different story + rules + discussion
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 25, 2015 18:10:38 GMT
From the experience before, this wouldn't work. But let's try again And ur right it ended in terror and insults insults werebdkne by me,lannes and somehow mountbattten as well, rest were trying to keep calm I wonder what netherfreek would feel like at that time  |
|
|
|
Post by Haelicon on Oct 25, 2015 18:11:27 GMT
I think we need the next war in ww2 but total different story + rules + discussion How about WWI? |
|
it ended in terror and insults
