|
|
Post by Vatutin on Oct 25, 2015 18:32:58 GMT
I think we need the next war in ww2 but total different story + rules + discussion Play by play be legit as possible |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 25, 2015 18:33:41 GMT
maybe its fun to select athe world map at a random time. lets say 1625. no alliances in the beginning and no war in the beginning. you can choose your alliances in the beginning and enter the war I would like this but 1625 is a bad choice. Because the Thirty Years' War. And this is exactly what I meant with the 1700 conquest. |
|
|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Oct 25, 2015 18:34:59 GMT
maybe its fun to select athe world map at a random time. lets say 1625. no alliances in the beginning and no war in the beginning. you can choose your alliances in the beginning and enter the war I would like this but 1625 is a bad choice. Because the Thirty Years' War. And this is exactly what I meant with the 1700 conquest. 1625 was just random... but 1700 is fine |
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 25, 2015 18:35:47 GMT
I would like this but 1625 is a bad choice. Because the Thirty Years' War. And this is exactly what I meant with the 1700 conquest. 1625 was just random... but 1700 is fine And we shall call it "Empire: Total War" Please tell me at least somebody gets the reference. |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 25, 2015 18:46:05 GMT
I'm a master of this era due to the amazing game of Dynasty Warriors!  Fact-checked and everything! *Lu Bu theme start playing* *Auto Corrected* *Auto Corrected* *Auto Corrected* *proceeds running in circles and spamming special attacks* OH MY GOD YES! LU BU IS SO OP I literally ride my horse around and do drive-bys while he yells "Fight me vermin!" |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Oct 25, 2015 18:47:38 GMT
How about this, if supreme conquering happens while a leader is asleep, his allies can control his troops. Not for anything major but just to defend from invaders.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 25, 2015 18:53:31 GMT
How about this, if supreme conquering happens while a leader is asleep, his allies can control his troops. Not for anything major but just to defend from invaders. Yes, this kind of existed before where you gave us command over your troops to fight GB and Vatutin gave us his. |
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Oct 26, 2015 11:45:15 GMT
COLD WAR COLD WAR COLD WAR!
|
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Oct 26, 2015 18:16:25 GMT
Maybe a rating should be given to each country, like:
Great Brittain: 5/5 stars (major power)
Netherlands: 2/5 stars (minor country)
This will give the participaters kind of an idea of their country's capablities, so it's not that the NEetherlands suddenly conquer Great Brittain and North America
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 26, 2015 18:17:47 GMT
Maybe a rating should be given to each country, like: Great Brittain: 5/5 stars (major power) Netherlands: 2/5 stars (minor country) This will give the participaters kind of an idea of their country's capablities, so it's not that the NEetherlands suddenly conquer Great Brittain and North America do it like six stars, 2-stars for minor, 4 for moderate, 6 for major. |
|
|
|
Post by Moreau on Oct 26, 2015 18:20:31 GMT
Also think about manpower, production and such
Also that your population doesnt want to fight a war forever with HUGE casualtie
|
|
|
|
Post by Von Bismarck jr on Oct 27, 2015 18:55:19 GMT
I would absolutely love to be a part of this stuff. I've seen the past few and they were either locked or I felt like it was too late to join in as a country not taken or conquered. I don't however know how to do this, isn't there a tutorial thread of sorts?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean Lannes on Oct 28, 2015 0:05:21 GMT
How about this? No technology or generals in the next one. I'm struggling enough with trying to do my math problems I don't want this game to also become so stressful that you have to calculate literally everything. |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Oct 28, 2015 0:07:53 GMT
Generals? I agree, no generals next time.
Tech? I think we should still have that, but less complex tech. The only reason the tech in this scenario is such a mess is because of the issue of industrialization. If we do the Cold War or another mentioned scenario, that won't happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Oct 28, 2015 11:17:07 GMT
Yeah the tech thing did make it a bit weird, good thing this big tech won't be there in the next war
|
|
