My honest opinion about WC4

I was one of the biggest supporters of this type of review until I played the game. After investing some time into it, I can say that it's a lot different than WC3. Easytech has made strides to make the game better by including Domination mode and putting a lot of effort into the campaigns. The hard modes are almost entirely new missions. They removed a lot of generals sure, but I for one can sacrifice the ability to play a one star country with 2 cities at the max along with some South American countries. The terrorists are copies of the aliens because the aliens were a working formula in WC3. They added an end game challenge to test the best of the best.

Part of the reason why they might not listen to us is because they are a Chinese company with a Chinese forum that is massively larger than ours. They also have the Russian forum. However, they did add a diplomacy system and even though none of us use it we can still count it as a progressive step in the right direction. The upcoming game will probably be GoG3 and then we will see if they truly learn from their past mistakes.

It's been like 2 months, maybe 3, since the trailer first came out and we were all excited like "OMG, new generals!", "OMG, there's a tech tree!". Well, I sorta feel cheated a little bit now, because WC2 and 3 had a huge difference, EW3, 4 and 5 all had a huge difference. And even GOG 1 and ACE had a huge difference. But I do not feel such difference this time. Compared to -6 months ET usually works on a game, they spent almost a year, and NetherFreek and others, including me have wished for a HUGE game. But, in reality, it's only some bad generals out of the game, generals discounts, some bordergore gone, only that. No huge difference, and some changes were not for the good, but worsened the game. In the Random Area and other threads, I always mentioned "No freshness that WC3 and EW4 gave me", and this stands. No big things changed. At least in EW5(which we all criticized), ET tried something new. Maybe the reason they are not trying something new is because we hated EW5, and GOG ACE. If that is the case, then part of it is our fault, I guess. Anyways, back into topic, I like the game. I really do, but there's just nothing new. Just some annoying features fixed(like border things), that's all. I gotta say, I am quite dissapointed with Easytech.
And the diplomacy, that we all waited for. It's almost nothing. The only feature it provided me was throwing away my cash. And declaring war? Pfft. Just an another useless feature.
And Mountbatten, I must disagree with you. Domination was a feature from EW5(which you hated) and 3KC(which you loved). I do not see anything new, just a mash-up with EW5 and WC4. I really hope they take a risk with GOG3, even if it's terrible, at least they tried to be innovated, whileas in WC4, they didn't.

andrei, as i said, i like the game, its good, almost awesome, but the sole reason for that is cause i liked WC3 and this is basically a upgraded WC3.

It isn't. If you learn it better, you will realise that IT JUST LOOKS LIKE WC3. In fact it is an entirely differnet game, with its own strategies and mechanics. Basically, I agree with what Mountbatten said.

Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb, why is Indonesia not under dutch control in 1939?

Red Cat Modding, Easytech games aren't known for their historical accuracy. But WC4 is much more accurate than WC3.
Plus, complaining about historical accuracy isn't an argument.

Actually, it adds more to my point, because it is about the LOOK of the game, not the actual game.

I am pretty sure it is because of the balance issue. ET is game developer not a historical institution.
France and Britain without their asian territories wouldn't be great powers. In this case there  would be just few great powers which is not good for the balance. Giving additional units to them wouldn't solve the problem, as financial power is also very important for the game balance.