|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 25, 2015 21:47:05 GMT
This thread going to get locked in ...3...2...1 No, we are continueing until the end! |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 25, 2015 22:40:13 GMT
Japan can get Malaya but not Burma if this war goes on....
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 25, 2015 23:00:36 GMT
Ok I think people are getting really salty here but still I wanna add that in the second th. war Sherman had BETRAYED lannes and Mountbatten because it was a sudden "all people of the world vs Spain" thing and even that war ended up with salty stuff so I am really double minded about a betrayal that it can cause tensions soooo I guess Sherman should reconsider this Though I too want the Asia theater to end soon but still as I said Sherman should think about it once  And like everyone is saying, don't let this get locked |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 26, 2015 0:19:16 GMT
Well if I can't get Burma, I'm not joining the allies. So...no dice. Staying Axis.
|
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Nov 26, 2015 2:44:57 GMT
Wow that heated up really quickly.
I really don't want to see any more theoretical wars get locked.
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Nov 26, 2015 6:35:14 GMT
I am actually a bit upset that I have to say this but this phase I will introduce some old new rules: -Major power can NOT switch sides, however they can be offered an armistice -One star countries CAN switch sides but it has to be a logical process, not: Every German puppet state turns against Germany -Everyone be kind too each other, we do not want a debacle as last time when it was closed and people ran away angrily -And General William T. Sherman you should have known that it was maybe a bit treacherous and weird to join the Allies bit I am happy things are back to normal -If you find your country mostly destroyed or a major loss you are expected to accept an armistice quicker or surrender. For Example: Japan conquers New Delhi, Calcutta and Mumbai, then I will expect Khurram to surrender because we are not all the USSR that fights until the last man and bullet. -Have fun and be honest if you want to leave, do not think leaving is backstabbing because Haelicon and I can replace the role. -Neutral countries can join a side |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 26, 2015 8:16:54 GMT
Well is the new phase up? I for my part seriously don't wanna see another locked war thread, this thing is made for fun purposes so just relax and have fun |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 26, 2015 10:27:18 GMT
Well quite frankly, I'm a bit upset that I can't switch sides. So I am turning neutral and leaving this rp. I'm sorry, but if others can do unrealistic stuff, I don't see why I can't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 26, 2015 12:08:48 GMT
Well quite frankly, I'm a bit upset that I can't switch sides. So I am turning neutral and leaving this rp. I'm sorry, but if others can do unrealistic stuff, I don't see why I can't. wait what?!?! Ok this is getting serious now |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Nov 26, 2015 14:53:32 GMT
I am sorry to see you go and I ask Jean Lannes to take over the Japanese Axis role. Next phase will start very very soon |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Nov 26, 2015 14:57:58 GMT
And do not forget people that this is meant to be funny so I ask everyone to be kind to each other  Losing/winning is part of a game and some people *cough* *cough* can not accept that. some people seek other challenges by switching sides, maybe that means fun for them but it means a stab-feeling for the whole them he left. I wan to keep fun for the whole group and that is why I did not changed the rule. Thank you for understanding, T |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Nov 26, 2015 15:00:03 GMT
This thread going to get locked in ...3...2...1 No, we are continuing until the end! Opinions can change quit fast in this game. |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 26, 2015 15:02:05 GMT
And do not forget people that this is meant to be funny so I ask everyone to be kind to each other Losing/winning is part of a game and some people *cough* *cough* can not accept that. some people seek other challenges by switching sides, maybe that means fun for them but it means a stab-feeling for the whole them he left. I wan to keep fun for the whole group and that is why I did not changed the rule. Thank you for understanding, T No, I don't understand Talleyrand. I really don't. Axis is winning by far and then possibly the most unimportant axis player in terms of Where the major actions are switches sides and you guys flip out. I don't understand, i really don't. I mean, you guys would most likely win even if I switched sides because of your extremely strong armies. |
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Nov 26, 2015 15:05:39 GMT
A new phase has begun!!
Epic new changes:
-Tech tree and army number has sort of disappeared. You can still argue you have more elite armies but it is a big job to change them every time and since this is the aftermath it does not maher that much anymore.
-What do you think is a fair number? Place yourself in the position of the defender and find out what is fair! (too crazy numbers will be changed by me)
|
|
|
|
Post by António Salazar on Nov 26, 2015 15:07:49 GMT
It is not about winning or losing it is about that this is not the diplomacy game. I think that is obvious that you leave a backstab-feeling in your previous team behind. I understand switching sides is fun for the switching player and the team where he is going too but the person also annoys his previous team. And this is for fun and not to annoy people. And General William T. Sherman I though you found history important in this war and Japan would never betray his allies, it even lasted the longest of the Axis members. It would also be weird if the USA teams up with Germany to kill GB. |
|
Losing/winning is part of a game and some people *cough* *cough* can not accept that. some people seek other challenges by switching sides, maybe that means fun for them but it means a stab-feeling for the whole them he left. I wan to keep fun for the whole group and that is why I did not changed the rule. 
