|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 2, 2019 19:25:15 GMT
I like dabrowski, but the guy gets rekt in 2 seconds. Bismarck’s helmet does fix that a bit but nerfs his damage hard. He can reach only reach Duke,so yeah he gets reckt easily, The better Cavalry team ,would be,of course Blucher, Murat, and Lan or some kind of version. I’d say that the perfect team would be build around ney, giving him the 20% crit buff, being supported by blucher, murat, and dabrowski. He would absolutely crush anything in his way |
|
|
|
Post by duclonealf on Aug 3, 2019 0:53:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 23, 2019 19:33:50 GMT
I rate Wellesley 4 stars. He’s similar to Bolivar. Has 3 great Infantry skills but his other 2 skills are meh for Infantry. However, he has good stats and can reach Emperor. You’re still better with buying Massena, but Wellesley isn’t bad at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 24, 2019 19:26:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 24, 2019 19:55:32 GMT
Even funnier is the url caption below 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 24, 2019 20:31:40 GMT
Even funny is the url caption below 😂 Lol! I don't know why it happened. |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 25, 2019 4:05:29 GMT
Even funny is the url caption below 😂 Lol! I don't know why it happened. He defeated Napoleon at Waterloo is how😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 25, 2019 5:33:19 GMT
Lol! I don't know why it happened. He defeated Napoleon at Waterloo is how😁 *cough* Blucher did *cough* |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 25, 2019 6:53:27 GMT
He defeated Napoleon at Waterloo is how😁 *cough* Blucher did *cough* Yeah,some pills are tough to swallow, Napoleon got a big Prussian horse pill to choke down at Waterloo 😊 |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 22, 2019 14:45:16 GMT
4/5 skills of his are in the good category (alert blows but oh well), and he has the biggest battle ability in the entire game. But suvorov only has 2 less while also being both significantly easier to use and better. But Suvorov also deals around 12% less damage due to having terrible infantry ability. Who do you guys think is better? I personally wanna say suvorov cuz suvorov will have pf active always which is an additional 25% damage anywhere he goes. Furthermore suvorov has insane crit damage.
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Sept 22, 2019 17:13:04 GMT
4/5 skills of his are in the good category (alert blows but oh well), and he has the biggest battle ability in the entire game. But suvorov only has 2 less while also being both significantly easier to use and better. But Suvorov also deals around 12% less damage due to having terrible infantry ability. Who do you guys think is better? I personally wanna say suvorov cuz suvorov will have pf active always which is an additional 25% damage anywhere he goes. Furthermore suvorov has insane crit damage. Suvorov, easily. Mountain is way tougher to use than plain is, and flexibility is incredibly important for any generals imo. There's no point in having +25% damage when theres nothing to hit from that tile. Plain alone can easily make up for that -12% damage. Wellesley is some kind of weird mountain-admiral Karl without Aura. Napoleon actually has +1 battle ability on Wellesley, though that +1 is useless, as 105 and 106 both give +26% damage and theres no item that can make that +1 BA actually do something. Wellesley was a defensive mastermind IRL, and ET really tried to make him one in this game by giving him Ambush and Alert. That really hurts him badly because offense is generally better than defense on land. A shame really, since his battles during the Peninsular War are pretty amazing. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 22, 2019 17:17:14 GMT
4/5 skills of his are in the good category (alert blows but oh well), and he has the biggest battle ability in the entire game. But suvorov only has 2 less while also being both significantly easier to use and better. But Suvorov also deals around 12% less damage due to having terrible infantry ability. Who do you guys think is better? I personally wanna say suvorov cuz suvorov will have pf active always which is an additional 25% damage anywhere he goes. Furthermore suvorov has insane crit damage. Suvorov, easily. Mountain way tougher to use than plain is, and flexibility is incredibly important for any generals imo. There's no point in having +25% damage when theres nothing to hit from that tile. Plain alone can easily make up for that -12% damage. Wellesley is some kind of weird mountain-admiral Karl without Aura. Napoleon actually has +1 battle ability on Wellesley, though that +1 is useless, as 105 and 106 both give +26% damage and theres no item that can make that +1 BA actually do something. Wellesley was a defensive mastermind IRL, and ET really tried to make him one in this game by giving him Ambush and Alert. That really hurts him badly because offense is generally better than defense on land. A shame really, since his battles during the Peninsular War are pretty amazing. Dang napoleon has a + 6 ability, and + 1 battle ability higher than wellesley. Never noticed. I agree. He is still good, but his mediocre skill set makes him not the best general for end game |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Sept 22, 2019 17:41:55 GMT
Suvorov, easily. Mountain way tougher to use than plain is, and flexibility is incredibly important for any generals imo. There's no point in having +25% damage when theres nothing to hit from that tile. Plain alone can easily make up for that -12% damage. Wellesley is some kind of weird mountain-admiral Karl without Aura. Napoleon actually has +1 battle ability on Wellesley, though that +1 is useless, as 105 and 106 both give +26% damage and theres no item that can make that +1 BA actually do something. Wellesley was a defensive mastermind IRL, and ET really tried to make him one in this game by giving him Ambush and Alert. That really hurts him badly because offense is generally better than defense on land. A shame really, since his battles during the Peninsular War are pretty amazing. Dang napoleon has a + 6 ability, and + 1 battle ability higher than wellesley. Never noticed. I agree. He is still good, but his mediocre skill set makes him not the best general for end game Yep, and Blucher is the IAP with the lowest stats overall but will still absolutely own both of them in a fight.  |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 22, 2019 19:03:03 GMT
Dang napoleon has a + 6 ability, and + 1 battle ability higher than wellesley. Never noticed. I agree. He is still good, but his mediocre skill set makes him not the best general for end game Yep, and Blucher is the IAP with the lowest stats overall but will still absolutely own both of them in a fight. Actually its in order of price. Napoleon has more ba than blucher who has more ba than wellesley. Which is very interesting |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Sept 22, 2019 19:31:04 GMT
Yep, and Blucher is the IAP with the lowest stats overall but will still absolutely own both of them in a fight. Actually its in order of price. Napoleon has more ba than blucher who has more ba than wellesley. Which is very interesting You sure? Blucher is the only IAP who doesn’t crack 100 BA at emperor. (he has 98 without any items) |
|
