|
Post by Seger on May 18, 2019 8:57:36 GMT
As I understood there will be no answers regarding previous "record" That's a bit weird, how did he missed the disscusion or is he just avoiding it?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2019 15:32:00 GMT
The records for 1815 can still be improved. For those who are interested in beating a record .
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on May 18, 2019 16:07:39 GMT
The records for 1815 can still be improved. For those who are interested in beating a record . If I'm ever free, I'll aim for a record unrelated to speed: Beating Austria 1812 with no player gens! Quite possibly, I may adopt Sun liren's strategy for this. One thing I'm interested in for 1815 speed records is how fast can a player take to smash through both Grande Armeés?
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 18, 2019 17:42:59 GMT
The records for 1815 can still be improved. For those who are interested in beating a record . If I'm ever free, I'll aim for a record unrelated to speed: Beating Austria 1812 with no player gens! Quite possibly, I may adopt Sun liren 's strategy for this. One thing I'm interested in for 1815 speed records is how fast can a player take to smash through both Grande Armeés? Did someone already beaten Tribal union with No gens?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2019 5:10:26 GMT
If I'm ever free, I'll aim for a record unrelated to speed: Beating Austria 1812 with no player gens! Quite possibly, I may adopt Sun liren 's strategy for this. One thing I'm interested in for 1815 speed records is how fast can a player take to smash through both Grande Armeés? Did someone already beaten Tribal union with No gens? Hmmm, possibly. Not sure if it's actually possible. U can survive, but winning is different. It will take a while to win tho, and requires to dedicate your concentration on the game to avoid misplaying.
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 19, 2019 7:36:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on May 19, 2019 8:49:52 GMT
Did someone already beaten Tribal union with No gens? Hmmm, possibly. Not sure if it's actually possible. U can survive, but winning is different. It will take a while to win tho, and requires to dedicate your concentration on the game to avoid misplaying. I am thinking about spain 1815 because it is easier to blitz france before they assemble the grand army.
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 19, 2019 13:41:59 GMT
Oh btw I just remembered there was an elite player telling me that Ottoman is good for rushing if you have good cavalry generals.
|
|
|
Post by stoic on May 19, 2019 14:37:42 GMT
Oh btw I just remembered there was an elite player telling me that Ottoman is good for rushing if you have good cavalry generals. It is probably 1806 conquest. I don't think that Ottomans can beat our 16 turns as France (and I'm sure 14-15 turns also are possible with some luck). And later South American and North Canadian cities are too far away from Turkey.
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 15:46:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 19, 2019 16:00:09 GMT
I don't get it Why don't you answer the questions. I don't believe you missed the questions you're avoiding them. Do you realise you won't get the recognition if you don't answer the questions?
|
|
|
Post by andrei on May 19, 2019 16:18:25 GMT
I don't get it Why don't you answer the questions. I don't believe you missed the questions you're avoiding them. Do you realise you won't get the recognition if you don't answer the questions? He's got no answers. He can't explain it. Same as won't be able to explain what is the unit (when did he hired him and how recieved funds taking into account his population limits at turn 2, as he hired Davout and Massena as well) occupied Berlin by turn 3 in his first screen for the "Warsaw record". Because in case it was Dambrowski his guys can't be in Danzig by turn 3. Or he is the luckiest man ever as with Saxony 1806 Personally I see no reason to discuss his records anymore
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 16:33:39 GMT
I am sorry, may I know what the question is?
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 16:55:00 GMT
I don't get it Why don't you answer the questions. I don't believe you missed the questions you're avoiding them. Do you realise you won't get the recognition if you don't answer the questions? He's got no answers. He can't explain it. Same as won't be able to explain what is the unit (when did he hired him and how recieved funds taking into account his population limits at turn 2, as he hired Davout and Massena as well) occupied Berlin by turn 3 in his first screen for the "Warsaw record". Because in case it was Dambrowski his guys can't be in Danzig by turn 3. Or he is the luckiest man ever as with Saxony 1806 Personally I see no reason to discuss his records anymore Well, again some of you calling me cheater. First of all I dont play this game to impress or to fool anybody, I play because I love it. And breaking records is a funny way for me to grind, other ways farming Netherlands 1789 is pretty boring. So, to be honest, I dont care what some of you think. But I am respectful with all in this forum, so I will give you some tips.
andrei, with all my respects, seems that you have ran out of imagination. Instead of calling me cheater (which I like, it feeds me!!!), grab your phone, and try to reproduce only the fist 3 turns. I am sure that you will find that is easier to test it than to call me cheater. Berlin was occupied in turn 2, by the way. Do you want me to post turns 1, 2 and 3?
I have a challenge for those of you who call me cheater. With your teams, try to beat Prussia in 3 turns, and post it. If you can't, then post the best you can do. After that I will show you my strategy step by step. Do you accept this challenge? I hope you do.
Cheers! cojoncio
|
|
|
Post by andrei on May 19, 2019 17:23:11 GMT
Hmm. It is a bit strange. Whole topic is a challenge. You posted Your records. There are questions. From stoic and from me. You can either answer or show strategy. UK1812, Saxony1806. Warsaw is just a good hanger to force You answer as I know You prepared this "record" better Wasn't digging just looked at the first screen So will You explain a strategies for the records?) I'm case it is legit, I will say: sorry, I was wrong.
|
|