|
|
Post by Seger on May 19, 2019 18:07:21 GMT
He's got no answers. He can't explain it. Same as won't be able to explain what is the unit (when did he hired him and how recieved funds taking into account his population limits at turn 2, as he hired Davout and Massena as well) occupied Berlin by turn 3 in his first screen for the "Warsaw record". Because in case it was Dambrowski his guys can't be in Danzig by turn 3. Or he is the luckiest man ever as with Saxony 1806  Personally I see no reason to discuss his records anymore Well, again some of you calling me cheater. First of all I dont play this game to impress or to fool anybody, I play because I love it. And breaking records is a funny way for me to grind, other ways farming Netherlands 1789 is pretty boring. So, to be honest, I dont care what some of you think. But I am respectful with all in this forum, so I will give you some tips.
andrei , with all my respects, seems that you have ran out of imagination. Instead of calling me cheater (which I like, it feeds me!!!), grab your phone, and try to reproduce only the fist 3 turns. I am sure that you will find that is easier to test it than to call me cheater. Berlin was occupied in turn 2, by the way. Do you want me to post turns 1, 2 and 3?
I have a challenge for those of you who call me cheater. With your teams, try to beat Prussia in 3 turns, and post it. If you can't, then post the best you can do. After that I will show you my strategy step by step. Do you accept this challenge? I hope you do.
Cheers! cojoncio i don't think my team will even come close because i've only three good gens  But you don't need to act so insulted , we distrust everyone and say yourself if everyone asks questions and you don't answer them but post new records that just feels suspicious.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on May 19, 2019 18:56:36 GMT
cojoncioIndeed there is not any reason to be offended. Let's reconstruct what happened before. You uploaded some pictures with a new record, we had some questions. Simple questions, to be honest. But you just ignored them and uploaded new images unrelated to our questions. So, there are 3 possible explanations : 1. You haven't seen them (well, in this case you can read a couple of previous pages, they are still there). 2. You ignore them, because you feel that it is beneath your self-esteem to answer those questions. But in this case you don't help us at all to erase our suspicions. 3. You don't have answers. I will be honest with you: some of your statements were questionable to me. And upgrades of your generals are not sufficient enough to beat one record after another. Some of them are so weak that they are hardly better than Jourdan. Yet, it is possible that I'm mistaken and you really demonstrate creative strategic approach. But you have to help us in changing our minds, otherwise these suspicions will remain for a long period of time. It well may be that you don't care, but believe me our community is a good place for all those players who enjoy to play ET games (provided they do not cheat).
|
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 20:19:41 GMT
cojoncio Indeed there is not any reason to be offended. Let's reconstruct what happened before. You uploaded some pictures with a new record, we had some questions. Simple questions, to be honest. But you just ignored them and uploaded new images unrelated to our questions. So, there are 3 possible explanations : 1. You haven't seen them (well, in this case you can read a couple of previous pages, they are still there). 2. You ignore them, because you feel that it is beneath your self-esteem to answer those questions. But in this case you don't help us at all to erase our suspicions. 3. You don't have answers. I will be honest with you: some of your statements were questionable to me. And upgrades of your generals are not sufficient enough to beat one record after another. Some of them are so weak that they are hardly better than Jourdan. Yet, it is possible that I'm mistaken and you really demonstrate creative strategic approach. But you have to help us in changing our minds, otherwise these suspicions will remain for a long period of time. It well may be that you don't care, but believe me our community is a good place for all those players who enjoy to play ET games (provided they do not cheat). To be honest, seems that whatever I post I will never answer your "questions". I just posted a comprehensive description of a new record with Warsaw and the first thing I got was a "you are a cheater because you don't show your 3 first movements".... If with my poor upgrades and poor generals I have beaten the existent 2-star, then the point is that you don't need to have the best generals, but to have generals with the right skills and specially make the best of what you have. If you have a look on the winning screen, you will see that I only killed 55 enemies, which is rather low in comparison with what others did in same age.
Ok, I will try first to beat 1-star 1806 and then I will try to beat my own record of UK33 @ 1812, unveiling here all the steps and my strategies. But to be truly honest, UK was so straightforward.....
|
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 20:35:31 GMT
stoic , this guy is making fools out of us. His new Warsaw record is also cheated. Turn 15. Murat landed. Manchester - lv4 city (320 deff points) - full health. Turn 16. Low morale Murat almost cracked Manchester defense - almost 300 damage to the city done during one attack. This is really a very strategic mind no doubt. I assume there were polish bombers who supported this assault. I think that there is no any need to ask for explanation from this guy... Yeah! I see that instead of accepting my challenge and beating Prussia in 3 turns with Warsaw @1806, you are literally burning your eyes looking for cheats or polish bombers! hahahahaha that feeds me a lot!
Just 2 tips: with that zoom-out view, what you see is the health of the garrison. Under that view, you can not see the health of the city, as you see on the screen of turn 16. Look at Sakurako at turn 11, and then look at her at turn 15. Please tell me what you think Sakurako has been doing these 4 turns. Fishing?
Indeed, it is a good point. In fact, I spent too much time at Manchester. If you see, the city was conquered at around turn 18 (in turn 19 I already have a stable and artillery shop. It means, this record is still not optimized. With a bit of more luck, this record could be improved one or two turns more. The top should be around 24-25 turns, which is what Spain takes to conquest Morocco (Though I have seen finishing Morocco at around turn 20!)
You see? No matter what I post,
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on May 19, 2019 20:42:28 GMT
stoic , this guy is making fools out of us. His new Warsaw record is also cheated. Turn 15. Murat landed. Manchester - lv4 city (320 deff points) - full health. Turn 16. Low morale Murat almost cracked Manchester defense - almost 300 damage to the city done during one attack. This is really a very strategic mind no doubt. I assume there were polish bombers who supported this assault. I think that there is no any need to ask for explanation from this guy... Yeah! I see that instead of accepting my challenge and beating Prussia in 3 turns with Warsaw @1806, you are literally burning your eyes looking for cheats or polish bombers! hahahahaha that feeds me a lot!
Just 2 tips: with that zoom-out view, what you see is the health of the garrison. Under that view, you can not see the health of the city, as you see on the screen of turn 16. Look at Sakurako at turn 11, and then look at her at turn 15. Please tell me what you think Sakurako has been doing these 4 turns. Fishing?
Indeed, it is a good point. In fact, I spent too much time at Manchester. If you see, the city was conquered at around turn 18 (in turn 19 I already have a stable and artillery shop. It means, this record is still not optimized. With a bit of more luck, this record could be improved one or two turns more. The top should be around 24-25 turns, which is what Spain takes to conquest Morocco (Though I have seen finishing Morocco at around turn 20!)
You see? No matter what I post,
Cheers!
The challege is the thread itself. You posted record. Means that You accepted the challenge and beated the record. Please specify the strategy. I am not very polite, true. stoic is Maybe I was wrong with these polish screens, agreed. I'll get deeper into the screens as soon as I have my tablet with the game and You will provide the answers for Britain and Saxony We all wait for those strategies! By now, I don't believe those results were legit. |
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 20:45:00 GMT
andrei, darling, I have seen that you have deleted the post I mention above!!! Why? Seems to me that you first post and then think. That is not the correct order, specially when accusing someone of cheating. There the correct sequence would be first thinking and then posting an accusation
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on May 19, 2019 20:57:05 GMT
stoic, darling, I have seen that you have deleted the post I mention above!!! Why? Seems to me that you first post and then think. That is not the correct order, specially when accusing someone of cheating. There the correct sequence would be first thinking and then posting an accusation We are not so close to call each other "darling", but I have no idea what are you talking about. Such posts are a double edge sword, actually. Because afterwards you'll be ashamed wishing to delete your post  As andrei pointed out I never said directly that you are a cheater. So your emotional post doesn't hit the target. And usually emotions are involved when someone has nothing to say about the subject and wish to leave a conversation accusing others. |
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 21:05:01 GMT
stoic , this guy is making fools out of us. His new Warsaw record is also cheated. Turn 15. Murat landed. Manchester - lv4 city (320 deff points) - full health. Turn 16. Low morale Murat almost cracked Manchester defense - almost 300 damage to the city done during one attack. This is really a very strategic mind no doubt. I assume there were polish bombers who supported this assault. I think that there is no any need to ask for explanation from this guy... darling, I believe I did like 25 additional cheats, but I don't remember when or where. Hopeful you are among us, so would you mind using your innate perspicacity to unveil my malice? Would you mind reviewing another time (or 10 times) all the screens and finding my treacherous strategies? Thanks God, Mankind have people like you or inspector Clouseau around, helping society to find and trap malefactors like me. I feel safer now knowing that villains and cheaters like I are well checked.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on May 19, 2019 21:16:10 GMT
stoic darling, I believe I did like 25 additional cheats, but I don't remember when or where. Hopeful you are among us, so would you mind using your innate perspicacity to unveil my malice? Would you mind reviewing another time (or 10 times) all the screens and finding my treacherous strategies? Thanks God, Mankind have people like you or inspector Clouseau around, helping society to find and trap malefactors like me. I feel safer now knowing that villains and cheaters like I are well checked.
For most gifted persons I can only say that there is an option to mention someone in his reply. It is called tagging. I haven't written this post, so I think some apologies would be appropriate. Don't you think? |
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 21:20:19 GMT
Oh I see I see! I made a serious mistake, and my sincere apologies to you stoic
He was andrei who posted and then deleted, not you, so I made a big mistake.
Sincere apologies again. I will edit these 2 post and change stoic by andrei
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on May 19, 2019 21:24:45 GMT
Oh I see I see! I made a serious mistake, and my sincere apologies to you stoic
He was andrei who posted and then deleted, not you, so I made a big mistake.
Sincere apologies again. I will edit these 2 post and change stoic by andrei
You mean my post about bombers? I edited it. But as soon as You quoted it already I decided to delete it in order not to make a mess. It is anyway in Your quote, so I see no problems... Will You answer our questions or it is just for trolling? Do we need to wait for Your answers or simply forget about Your records? |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on May 19, 2019 21:40:45 GMT
Indeed, cojoncio, if you simply could answer our questions, all these "niceties" above were simply unnecessary. It doesn't make a situation more simpe. If for some reasons you don't want to answer it is the right time to stop this conversation as the most unproductive one. |
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 19, 2019 22:09:58 GMT
andrei , let me use my own words regarding your last post. You first posted an unfunded accusation and then you tried to hide it. Who is the troll?
stoic , indeed, I would be pleased to answer all questions mentioned in previous posts. But before continue with former records, lets wrap up Warsaw 1806: Do you have any questions regarding this record? |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on May 19, 2019 22:19:54 GMT
andrei , let me use my own words regarding your last post. You first posted an unfunded accusation and then you tried to hide it. Who is the troll?
stoic , indeed, I would be pleased to answer all questions mentioned in previous posts. But before continue with former records, lets wrap up Warsaw 1806: Do you have any questions regarding this record? , I assume You are the troll as You first ignore the questions addressed to You during couple of days and at the same time ready to skirmish during several hours just for Your fun. I don't have question regarding Warsaw 1806 for now. Will it stimulate You to answer questions regarding the strategies for UK1812 and Saxony1806? There were several easy questions. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on May 19, 2019 22:37:02 GMT
Oh btw I just remembered there was an elite player telling me that Ottoman is good for rushing if you have good cavalry generals. It is probably 1806 conquest. I don't think that Ottomans can beat our 16 turns as France (and I'm sure 14-15 turns also are possible with some luck). And later South American and North Canadian cities are too far away from Turkey. I think he was referring to declaring on the entire map. |
|
But you don't need to act so insulted, we distrust everyone and say yourself if everyone asks questions and you don't answer them but post new records that just feels suspicious.
