|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 8, 2019 7:26:10 GMT
Yes many historical inaccuracies here that might impede the fun aspect of the game.
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 8, 2019 10:47:52 GMT
Yes many historical inaccuracies here that might impede the fun aspect of the game. To balance this kind of changes easytech also coud add Albania for italy and Iraq for the axis ( i thought they joined the axis IRL)
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 8, 2019 12:16:01 GMT
Yes many historical inaccuracies here that might impede the fun aspect of the game. To balance this kind of changes easytech also coud add Albania for italy and Iraq for the axis ( i thought they joined the axis IRL) not so sure about albania as it is sufficient under italy... but yes iraq will be an interesting addition(and nearby there can be some uk units or cities). Imagine contesting speed runs with iraq! Very easy access to the 3 crucial fronts, africa europe and asia
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 8, 2019 16:48:15 GMT
To balance this kind of changes easytech also coud add Albania for italy and Iraq for the axis ( i thought they joined the axis IRL) not so sure about albania as it is sufficient under italy... but yes iraq will be an interesting addition(and nearby there can be some uk units or cities). Imagine contesting speed runs with iraq! Very easy access to the 3 crucial fronts, africa europe and asia albania is simply meant to make the axis stronger to compensate for the addition of allied countries. and iraq would make the middle east more interesting and also give india an enemy that is close to what would also make the conquest more exciting for india
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 8, 2019 22:32:50 GMT
not so sure about albania as it is sufficient under italy... but yes iraq will be an interesting addition(and nearby there can be some uk units or cities). Imagine contesting speed runs with iraq! Very easy access to the 3 crucial fronts, africa europe and asia albania is simply meant to make the axis stronger to compensate for the addition of allied countries. and iraq would make the middle east more interesting and also give india an enemy that is close to what would also make the conquest more exciting for india India conquest is already very "exciting" considering the axis spam ^0^
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 9, 2019 4:08:16 GMT
albania is simply meant to make the axis stronger to compensate for the addition of allied countries. and iraq would make the middle east more interesting and also give india an enemy that is close to what would also make the conquest more exciting for india India conquest is already very "exciting" considering the axis spam ^0^ exciting is not quite the right word, it would give india an enemy that is closer. with india the problem is that you only get to your enemies late and that they have defeated all your allies.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 9, 2019 6:58:18 GMT
Yes im joking haha but its really up to personal opinion, do you enjoy the rush of fighting spams? Durst thou wisheth to seeth thy generals wrecketh havoc? Would easy undefended cities be too easy and mundane?
|
|
|
Post by Ralyks on May 9, 2019 21:29:59 GMT
Hey jamesyang, not meaning to be rude or anything alike, but as you took my picture without giving credits or asking for the making of this thread, could you at least please not ignore me? I dont mind if it all ends in a "no" with some reasoning, but I prefer the "no" than being ignored. I'll TLDR my previous response for suggestions: - As technology upgrades get more expensive the further you get, so do raise the rewards for conquest, campaigns and challenges, why not the same for these videos? 3600 gold for a level 50 is a joke, when upgrades cost ~200,000. Make it scale with level
- Level 01-10 -> 3200 gold OR 1200 industry OR 300 energy OR 25 technology
- Level 11-20 -> 6000 gold OR 2300 industry OR 550 energy OR 45 technology
- Level 21-30 -> 8800 gold OR 3400 industry OR 800 energy OR 65 technology
- Level 31-40 -> 11600 gold OR 4500 industry OR 1150 energy OR 85 technology
- Level 41-50 -> 14400 gold OR 5600 industry OR 1400 energy OR 105 technology
- NUMBERS ARE JUST PLACEHOLDERS, fine if they are tweaked, but I gave an example on how it could be
- As general upgrades get more expensive the more you go progress through the game , why not rewards for these video too? Pre-level 30 get 4 medals, post level 30 get 6.
- Terrorist campaign as a counter to United Nations. Same maps, but with United Nations owning most of the maps this time. You play along 2 other terrorist allies (as handling yourself all the troops is more boring and has less RNG)
- Terrorist challenges, not asking for more than 2 of each (Rescue the ally, Hold the Ground, Wipe out the Enemy and Accumulate Supplies). Any mission extra would be welcomed too
- Terrorist conquest. Map is way less owned by terrorist (for now), and terrorists are spread all around the world, them being split by 6-8 "factions", all allied ofc (some joining before others?). Player gets to choose one (some 1 star, others 2, others 3)
Stats and models for terrorists troops are already in, so it just needs some creativity (which I've seen Easytech does well at) and testing for balance (so that these are challenging, as they're the final stages of the game)
-- Thanks in advance
|
|
muller1942
Major
King of Imperial Ostwynne
Posts: 172
|
Post by muller1942 on May 11, 2019 19:16:18 GMT
More foreign generals, and Italians please
|
|
|
Post by Ralyks on May 12, 2019 10:50:41 GMT
Well... Spain has literally not a single purchasable general, and in Conquest, only Franco shows up, which has weak skills. There were other way better commanders from Spain in the Spanish Civil War, but seems that as Spain was almost entirely out of the WW2 theatre, it will be hard ignored. Same goes for Portugal.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on May 12, 2019 10:55:23 GMT
Well... Spain has literally not a single purchasable general, and in Conquest, only Franco shows up, which has weak skills. There were other way better commanders from Spain in the Spanish Civil War, but seems that as Spain was almost entirely out of the WW2 theatre, it will be hard ignored. Same goes for Portugal. maybe adding them in 1950 or 1980 conquests wont hurt
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 12, 2019 16:38:43 GMT
Well... Spain has literally not a single purchasable general, and in Conquest, only Franco shows up, which has weak skills. There were other way better commanders from Spain in the Spanish Civil War, but seems that as Spain was almost entirely out of the WW2 theatre, it will be hard ignored. Same goes for Portugal. I think it is because Spain at that time only had a civil war, Portugal had not even a war you can't add a general who has never done anything special
|
|
|
Post by Fedor von Bock on May 16, 2019 20:57:55 GMT
Just like the general I mentioned here european-war-4.boards.net/thread/10643/potential-roc-general you guys should add some more ease asian generals, some of them deserve to be in game. And it will be CRAZY cool if you guys added a side campaign for Chinese Civil War, although I fully understand that might interfere with your country's political thinking. Like I said last sentence, you guys can also make a easy side campaign for smaller or minor war, for example spainish civil war. side campaign can be unlocked after playing one of the main wars, for example after you finish WW2 pacific, you will unlock Chinese civil war. Side campaign is not required to head to the next major war. that's all the ideas I have so far, thanks for letting us share our thoughts! jamesyang
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 17, 2019 6:02:00 GMT
Just like the general I mentioned here european-war-4.boards.net/thread/10643/potential-roc-general you guys should add some more ease asian generals, some of them deserve to be in game. And it will be CRAZY cool if you guys added a side campaign for Chinese Civil War, although I fully understand that might interfere with your country's political thinking. Like I said last sentence, you guys can also make a easy side campaign for smaller or minor war, for example spainish civil war. side campaign can be unlocked after playing one of the main wars, for example after you finish WW2 pacific, you will unlock Chinese civil war. Side campaign is not required to head to the next major war. that's all the ideas I have so far, thanks for letting us share our thoughts! jamesyang like a side campaign in ew6?
|
|
nutegunray
Staff Sergeant
As you know, our blockade is perfectly legal.
Posts: 5
|
Post by nutegunray on May 21, 2019 3:30:53 GMT
Hello, I've been playing WC4 for a while now but I'm a new member here. Thank you for all your work making this game! I've sunk hours into it and its predecessor, WC3. I love the idea of changing history with the conquests.
I'd like to echo the sentiments of the others and say that medals would be the best reward for watching ads. I would like to see a second cold war conquest like World Conqueror 3 had, particularly with an East and West Germany.
This is a long shot request, but it would be a nice feature to declare war on allies, just to make it more interesting. Thanks for your time!
|
|