|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Feb 18, 2020 15:06:22 GMT
There's no poll for this because it is quite open to the floor. __________________________________________________________ Context: With the introduction of the <Skill Reset> feature and in the future, possibly new generals, the situation has changed slightly. Additionally, the 2 blue free inf gens (Carol I and Esperey) seem to be quite expendable given their low raw strength (BA + Inf Abilities) and limitations in terms of number of skills. I am considering whether to replace them and who is best to do so. With my current best inf gens being Bodyazhiev and Grant (I heavily invested in his skills up until Count so I prefer him over Nicholas who I neglected). __________________________________________________________ There's MacArthur with his Inf Commander, Boroevic, Haig, Lee and even Macmahon and Bismarck had been recommended before! Certainly, we can judge them based on calculated raw strength: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12145/inf-generals-max-battle-ability by dagonithtrThrough comparisons: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12151/haig-boroevicAnd european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12193/general-potential-price-comparisonI hope to hear more thoughts in a thread that acts as a summary to this issue. Who do you think deserve to be the 4 endgame inf gens a player can/should have and why? |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Feb 18, 2020 16:41:14 GMT
There's no poll for this because it is quite open to the floor. __________________________________________________________ Context: With the introduction of the <Skill Reset> feature and in the future, possibly new generals, the situation has changed slightly. Additionally, the 2 blue free inf gens (Carol I and Esperey) seem to be quite expendable given their low raw strength (BA + Inf Abilities) and limitations in terms of number of skills. I am considering whether to replace them and who is best to do so. With my current best inf gens being Bodyazhiev and Grant (I heavily invested in his skills up until Count so I prefer him over Nicholas who I neglected). __________________________________________________________ There's MacArthur with his Inf Commander, Boroevic, Haig, Lee and even Macmahon and Bismarck had been recommended before! Certainly, we can judge them based on calculated raw strength: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12145/inf-generals-max-battle-ability by dagonithtrThrough comparisons: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12151/haig-boroevicAnd european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12193/general-potential-price-comparisonI hope to hear more thoughts in a thread that acts as a summary to this issue. Who do you think deserve to be the 4 endgame inf gens a player can/should have and why? Without doubt E.lee, Boroevic, Haig and Macmahon. Why? They have 5 skills and the highest TA |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Feb 18, 2020 16:50:06 GMT
^
Not that you really need 4 inf. 3 is enough I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Feb 18, 2020 21:39:20 GMT
There's no poll for this because it is quite open to the floor. __________________________________________________________ Context: With the introduction of the <Skill Reset> feature and in the future, possibly new generals, the situation has changed slightly. Additionally, the 2 blue free inf gens (Carol I and Esperey) seem to be quite expendable given their low raw strength (BA + Inf Abilities) and limitations in terms of number of skills. I am considering whether to replace them and who is best to do so. With my current best inf gens being Bodyazhiev and Grant (I heavily invested in his skills up until Count so I prefer him over Nicholas who I neglected). __________________________________________________________ There's MacArthur with his Inf Commander, Boroevic, Haig, Lee and even Macmahon and Bismarck had been recommended before! Certainly, we can judge them based on calculated raw strength: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12145/inf-generals-max-battle-ability by dagonithtrThrough comparisons: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12151/haig-boroevicAnd european-war-4.boards.net/thread/12193/general-potential-price-comparisonI hope to hear more thoughts in a thread that acts as a summary to this issue. Who do you think deserve to be the 4 endgame inf gens a player can/should have and why? Without doubt E.lee, Boroevic, Haig and Macmahon. Why? They have 5 skills and the highest TA Agreed. But bismarck is a pretty solid cheap alternative (only counterattack has to go). But those 4 are the best in their tier |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Feb 18, 2020 22:15:04 GMT
Without doubt E.lee, Boroevic, Haig and Macmahon. Why? They have 5 skills and the highest TA Agreed. But bismarck is a pretty solid cheap alternative (only counterattack has to go). But those 4 are the best in their tier Bismarck being a cheap alternative to things. What a world we live in. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Feb 18, 2020 22:37:32 GMT
Agreed. But bismarck is a pretty solid cheap alternative (only counterattack has to go). But those 4 are the best in their tier Bismarck being a cheap alternative to things. What a world we live in. He is good in both games though. Unlike Grant 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Feb 19, 2020 12:40:26 GMT
I am only going to make a statement after the new update comes, everythings really unpredictable now.
|
|
|
|
Post by zabadanov86 on Feb 19, 2020 16:54:52 GMT
I completed the whole game with 3 stars including all conqueats, except 2 Bulgarian and Romanian missions without generals and there were only few missions that I used 2 or more infantry generals. So 2 are enough, 3 is welcome but not necessary.
|
|
|
|
Post by zabadanov86 on Feb 19, 2020 18:07:01 GMT
Correction, I finished Romanian mission with 3 stars with 10 large medpacs☺
|
|
|
|
Post by Kurt von Schleicher on Feb 19, 2020 18:49:46 GMT
Bismarck being a cheap alternative to things. What a world we live in. He is good in both games though. Unlike Grant 😂 You mean Infantry God Grant, Successor of the Infantry God Clinton😆 |
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on Mar 1, 2020 6:19:03 GMT
You only need two inf endgame gens though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Mar 1, 2020 12:03:43 GMT
You only need two inf endgame gens though. True, but say we maximise the 12 slots, who should we buy? That's^^ the real question. |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Mar 1, 2020 12:13:47 GMT
You only need two inf endgame gens though. True, but say we maximise the 12 slots, who should we buy? That's^^ the real question. We have 20 slots but if you want to maximise every slot I think you would get for inf Haig, e lee and boerovic, for cav Jackson, Johnston and Joffre, for arty the three gold gens and for navy bacon and Beatty. The other slots would I keep open because we will have to switch generals for the history missions |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Mar 2, 2020 8:48:49 GMT
True, but say we maximise the 12 slots, who should we buy? That's^^ the real question. We have 20 slots but if you want to maximise every slot I think you would get for inf Haig, e lee and boerovic, for cav Jackson, Johnston and Joffre, for arty the three gold gens and for navy bacon and Beatty. The other slots would I keep open because we will have to switch generals for the history missions I think I'll keep Moltke to the end since I have a strong emotional attachment to him  |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on Mar 2, 2020 9:45:32 GMT
We have 20 slots but if you want to maximise every slot I think you would get for inf Haig, e lee and boerovic, for cav Jackson, Johnston and Joffre, for arty the three gold gens and for navy bacon and Beatty. The other slots would I keep open because we will have to switch generals for the history missions I think I'll keep Moltke to the end since I have a strong emotional attachment to him He quite useful for farming books |
|
