|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:24:59 GMT
Why? Could You give reasons? Because they are extensions of the same general!! Meanwhile Vatutin is different, and Better on Medium tanks and Armored Cars! , do you agree with me? |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 16:26:45 GMT
Why? Could You give reasons? Because they are extensions of the same general!! Meanwhile Vatutin is different, and Better on Medium tanks and Armored Cars! I don't used gens on crappy unit types like armored cars. Medium tanks? I want them fast. Any other reasons? |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:28:40 GMT
Because they are extensions of the same general!! Meanwhile Vatutin is different, and Better on Medium tanks and Armored Cars! I don't used gens on crappy unit types like armored cars. Medium tanks? I want them fast. Any other reasons? They are fast already. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 16:30:27 GMT
I don't used gens on crappy unit types like armored cars. Medium tanks? I want them fast. Any other reasons? They are fast already. Not enough. This game is special when it comes to terrain types. Rivers are pain in the arse. I don't want to be block on the river hex with my gen on tank. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 19, 2021 16:34:41 GMT
Not enough. This game is special when it comes to terrain types. Rivers are pain in the arse. I don't want to be block on the river hex with my gen on tank. It would be cool if engineers could build bridges so our entire army doesn't get bogged down trying to cross a river. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 19, 2021 16:37:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 19, 2021 16:43:00 GMT
Patton (Medium tank), Rokossovsky (heavy tank), Monty (heavy tank)
Vs
Vatutin (medium tank), Rokossovsky (heavy tank), Patton (heavy tank)
Is the dilemma for me. Personally, I ain’t a huge fan of monty.
|
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 19, 2021 16:43:37 GMT
Patton (Medium tank), Rokossovsky (heavy tank), Monty (heavy tank) Vs Vatutin (medium tank), Rokossovsky (heavy tank), Patton (heavy tank) Is the dilemma for me. Personally, I ain’t a huge fan of monty. 1st duh-doy. |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Mar 19, 2021 16:44:35 GMT
Because they are extensions of the same general!! Meanwhile Vatutin is different, and Better on Medium tanks and Armored Cars! , do you agree with me? I don't use medium tanks and armored cars as units for my generals unless I have another choice. I would rather wait until our reinforcements arrive. I am quite certain though that we'll be able to use 3 heavy tanks in Antarctic campaigns. My personal favorites are Roko, Patton and Vatutin. Monty's AF is a useless skill late in the game, and I am not fond of any replenishing bonuses either. |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:44:51 GMT
Patton (Medium tank), Rokossovsky (heavy tank), Monty (heavy tank) Vs Vatutin (medium tank), Rokossovsky (heavy tank), Patton (heavy tank) Is the dilemma for me. Personally, I ain’t a huge fan of monty. 1st duh-doy. , you want to bring this back up? |
|
|
|
Post by Port on Mar 19, 2021 16:45:53 GMT
stoic , do you agree with me? I don't use medium tanks and armored cars as units for my generals unless I have another choice. I would rather wait until our reinforcements arrive. I am quite certain though that we'll be able to use 3 heavy tanks in Antarctic campaigns. My personal favorites are Roko, Patton and Vatutin. Monty's AF is a useless skill late in the game, and I am not fond of any replenishing bonuses either. 3 heavy tanks= Patton/ Montgomery, Rokossovsky/ Montgomery, Vatutin. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on Mar 19, 2021 16:52:34 GMT
Patton (Medium tank), Rokossovsky (heavy tank), Monty (heavy tank) Vs Vatutin (medium tank), Rokossovsky (heavy tank), Patton (heavy tank) Is the dilemma for me. Personally, I ain’t a huge fan of monty. 1st one is better because the order of the second one is wrong. It should be: Roko and Vatutin on heavy tanks and Patton on the medium. Only one of them has blitzkreig. |
|
|
|
Post by eeeeef on Mar 19, 2021 16:52:55 GMT
eeeeef, you want to bring this back up? Preferably no. |
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Mar 19, 2021 19:11:53 GMT
I don't use medium tanks and armored cars as units for my generals unless I have another choice. I would rather wait until our reinforcements arrive. I am quite certain though that we'll be able to use 3 heavy tanks in Antarctic campaigns. My personal favorites are Roko, Patton and Vatutin. Monty's AF is a useless skill late in the game, and I am not fond of any replenishing bonuses either. 3 heavy tanks= Patton/ Montgomery, Rokossovsky/ Montgomery, Vatutin. Patton has Blitzkrieg, better for medium tanks. So Montgomery, Rokossovsky, Vatutin in that case for Heavy. Gunderian and Patton for medium. There is just one problem. What shall we do with Rundstedt? He is supposed to be good on tank. What a shame. I am not mentioning Rommel. He is probably also outclassed by Vatutin as I understand. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Mar 19, 2021 19:33:59 GMT
3 heavy tanks= Patton/ Montgomery, Rokossovsky/ Montgomery, Vatutin. Patton has Blitzkrieg, better for medium tanks. So Montgomery, Rokossovsky, Vatutin in that case for Heavy. Gunderian and Patton for medium. There is just one problem. What shall we do with Rundstedt? He is supposed to be good on tank. What a shame. I am not mentioning Rommel. He is probably also outclassed by Vatutin as I understand. In campaigns where you only have axis generals, only guderian and rommel are any good at tanks. So unless you want to buy Heinrici for tanks, Rundstedt exists as a third option. |
|
