|
|
Post by Joseph Stalin on May 1, 2021 20:00:59 GMT
You cant play kv-6 with rommel. KV-6 is a crazy experimental soviet battleship tank and the gen that goes best is roko. Rommel with max maus and guderian with med panther are the best combos. Rommel could have been the best tank guy if. he had anti-armor instead of desert.guderian is number 1 for axis tank. ( ı perfect cleared desert campaigns without rommel) but I bought him in 44 europe saying that Rommel is no good on KV-6 is like saying that Leeb sucks on Katyusha, or that Govorov is no good on a Karl. I didnt say that rommel sucks at kv-6. kv-6 is a Soviet gun and in campaign modes you cannot play them both. |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 1, 2021 20:01:56 GMT
*cough* air force hybrid *cough* mechanist *cough* panzer leader *cough* roko has pl as well. I never put my main HT gen on airport. Roko has a silver machinist and HT generally preserves its inital health. Rokos anti armor shines. Anti Armor>>>>>> ace forces( the worst skill in tha game, its real BS that the best gens in the game has it.) Mechanist is not bad anyway. If leveling up recovered health like it did in WC3, then Monty would be the most survivable general in the game. |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 1, 2021 20:04:11 GMT
saying that Rommel is no good on KV-6 is like saying that Leeb sucks on Katyusha, or that Govorov is no good on a Karl. I didnt say that rommel sucks at kv-6. kv-6 is a Soviet gun and in campaign modes you cannot play them both. *sighs* I'm sorry, but you talked like the KV-6 is only good for Roko. This is more of a Katyusha dilemma, where it is just good, no general truly makes it better in anything but output. |
|
|
|
Post by Joseph Stalin on May 1, 2021 20:04:49 GMT
roko has pl as well. I never put my main HT gen on airport. Roko has a silver machinist and HT generally preserves its inital health. Rokos anti armor shines. Anti Armor>>>>>> ace forces( the worst skill in tha game, its real BS that the best gens in the game has it.) BaCk In My DaY AcE FoRcEs WaS a PrEtTy DaM GoOd SkIlL. I don't really like HT anyway. Too squishy. You know what, I'll just get Patton. I hate him, but y'all be forcin' me to  patton is great and the sole option for a med tank.(in allied ofc) You should NEVER get navy-air gens before you reach 44 and even 45( if you can do it). Patton-Roko(or monty) is the allied combo while rommel- guderian for axis.GOG3 doesnt give much flexibility for gens and the things you should by are pretty straightforward |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 1, 2021 20:06:24 GMT
BaCk In My DaY AcE FoRcEs WaS a PrEtTy DaM GoOd SkIlL. I don't really like HT anyway. Too squishy. You know what, I'll just get Patton. I hate him, but y'all be forcin' me to :( patton is great and the sole option for a med tank.(in allied ofc) You should NEVER get navy-air gens before you reach 44 and even 45( if you can do it). Patton-Roko(or monty) is the allied combo while rommel- guderian for axis.GOG3 doesnt give much flexibility for gens and the things you should by are pretty straightforward I see in Patton what y'all see in Monty. A bragging, no-skill, general. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on May 1, 2021 23:28:19 GMT
I already know that Roko is good against tanks; you don't need to repeat it. The thing is that you're putting infantry and armor together again; my question pertains to infantry specifically. When you use the word "and", it means that the two clauses both apply to the subject; they can apply together and separately. Imagine caring abt tank generals. arty gens are better. If you play AG, put Govorov in Heavy Arty, and then send a bunch of Dragoon Corps or Prince Eugen ahead of him, and he is terrifying. I still have not bought any tank gens lol. Half of all the axis free generals are tanks, while you can easily get by on Leclerc and Timoshenko in the few allied missions where tanks make a difference. Sure, you'll want one for endgame, but Guderian and Monty should be enough for me. Hmmm . . . That might be why you're struggling a lot with certain missions. The free tank generals get outclassed pretty soon, except for Timoshenko and Bock. You need good tanks to win. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on May 1, 2021 23:32:52 GMT
Imagine caring abt tank generals. arty gens are better. If you play AG, put Govorov in Heavy Arty, and then send a bunch of Dragoon Corps or Prince Eugen ahead of him, and he is terrifying. I still have not bought any tank gens lol. Half of all the axis free generals are tanks, while you can easily get by on Leclerc and Timoshenko in the few allied missions where tanks make a difference. Sure, you'll want one for endgame, but Guderian and Monty should be enough for me. Why monty? I dont know why people like monty more than rokossovsky. Rokossovsky is better, monty will struggle badly against tanks with his trash 2 skills as someone said above I think the reverse is true. More People like Roko over Monty. As for why people like Monty, I have already outlined my reasons earlier. |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 1, 2021 23:46:44 GMT
Imagine caring abt tank generals. arty gens are better. If you play AG, put Govorov in Heavy Arty, and then send a bunch of Dragoon Corps or Prince Eugen ahead of him, and he is terrifying. I still have not bought any tank gens lol. Half of all the axis free generals are tanks, while you can easily get by on Leclerc and Timoshenko in the few allied missions where tanks make a difference. Sure, you'll want one for endgame, but Guderian and Monty should be enough for me. Hmmm . . . That might be why you're struggling a lot with certain missions. The free tank generals get outclassed pretty soon, except for Timoshenko and Bock. You need good tanks to win. I don't really think it's the tanks that are the problem rn. So far in 1942 I have only terribly required Timoshenko in Withdrawal From New Britain. 1941 Axis is very tank centric, but all 3 of your free generals are compatible with tanks. Badoglio was there simply for firepower. You should be able to achieve all missions except for Mercury and Allied Crete with only free generals...up until 1942. |
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on May 1, 2021 23:52:36 GMT
Hmmm . . . That might be why you're struggling a lot with certain missions. The free tank generals get outclassed pretty soon, except for Timoshenko and Bock. You need good tanks to win. I don't really think it's the tanks that are the problem rn. So far in 1942 I have only terribly required Timoshenko in Withdrawal From New Britain. 1941 Axis is very tank centric, but all 3 of your free generals are compatible with tanks. Badoglio was there simply for firepower. You should be able to achieve all missions except for Mercury and Allied Crete with only free generals...up until 1942. I just said that Timoshenko is an exception. Also, 1942 is included in "pretty soon". Have fun trying to get through Axis Pacific with Leeb and Badoglio. By the way, Mercury and Crete are doable with the free 1939 gens. |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 2, 2021 0:07:27 GMT
I don't really think it's the tanks that are the problem rn. So far in 1942 I have only terribly required Timoshenko in Withdrawal From New Britain. 1941 Axis is very tank centric, but all 3 of your free generals are compatible with tanks. Badoglio was there simply for firepower. You should be able to achieve all missions except for Mercury and Allied Crete with only free generals...up until 1942. I just said that Timoshenko is an exception. Also, 1942 is included in "pretty soon". Have fun trying to get through Axis Pacific with Leeb and Badoglio. By the way, Mercury and Crete are doable with the free 1939 gens. I'm not very good at GoG3. I only have Badoglio lol. I'll try some star missions and get a tank general since everyone is looking upon me with disdain for not immediately grinding for Guderian. I come from WC3, where artillery generals are a priority, and everything else just comes as a nice acommodation. |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 2, 2021 0:08:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by HangryBird on May 2, 2021 0:10:11 GMT
I just said that Timoshenko is an exception. Also, 1942 is included in "pretty soon". Have fun trying to get through Axis Pacific with Leeb and Badoglio. By the way, Mercury and Crete are doable with the free 1939 gens. I'm not very good at GoG3. I only have Badoglio lol. I'll try some star missions and get a tank general since everyone is looking upon me with disdain for not immediately grinding for Guderian. I come from WC3, where artillery generals are a priority, and everything else just comes as a nice acommodation. You didn't need to immediately grind for Guderian first. It's the most optimal path, but it's not absolutely necessary. Alternatives include getting Rommel or Leeb. Buying Badoglio first was an okay option too. |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on May 2, 2021 11:00:08 GMT
patton is great and the sole option for a med tank.(in allied ofc) You should NEVER get navy-air gens before you reach 44 and even 45( if you can do it). Patton-Roko(or monty) is the allied combo while rommel- guderian for axis.GOG3 doesnt give much flexibility for gens and the things you should by are pretty straightforward I see in Patton what y'all see in Monty. A bragging, no-skill, general. Wonder why you saying this? Patton is no-skill general? |
|
|
|
Post by STILETT0 on May 2, 2021 15:28:21 GMT
I see in Patton what y'all see in Monty. A bragging, no-skill, general. Wonder why you saying this? Patton is no-skill general? Messina was rigged. |
|
|
|
Post by yuanzhong on May 2, 2021 15:48:58 GMT
Wonder why you saying this? Patton is no-skill general? Messina was rigged. Ok, I care in-game general and you talk about the real one. 2 different objects 🤣🤣🤣. I stop. |
|
