|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 19, 2016 13:41:52 GMT
1935-1936 The Swedish Nationalist Organisation has become increasingly powerful drawing new members with the promise of a better socialist Sweden. With backing from the USSR the SNO sucssesfully launches a coup in Stockholm and forms an independent socialist Sweden. The newly formed Swedish Socialist Republic (SSR) is rulles an increasingly authoritarian regime and revives large amounts of aid from the Soviet Union. The SSR begins funding grouped like the former SNO in Norway, Finland and Denmark with the hopes of weakening the Baltc Entente. The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Scandanavia are formed and are based primarily in Northen Norway. They are funded by the USSR and Sweden but are not as sucssesfull as the SNO was. Sweden begins building a naval fleet but is unable to pass the Baltic Entente and an arms race begins. With the USSR's industrial might awaiting them, it is possible Sweden could become a threat to the Baltics...War is only a matter of time... It is too ahistorical, soviets tried to do such things and all of those were ended, before even started, don't forget, Swedend and Denmark are monarchies and people highly values their kings Also even if they would make something like what you mentioned, it couldn't hold anything key to weaken entente, as Swedes would very fast deal with situation I'm sorry but I honestly cannot see how what I'm doing is more ahistorical than the Baltic Entente. There is no way that Scandanavia would unite with the much poorer Baltic States. Please stop saying everything I do is ahistorical. Been ahistorical is the whole point of this. I like the idea of the Baltic Allaince but I think it's far more likely that Scandanavia would stand as either its own unified country or its seperate ones. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 19, 2016 13:46:21 GMT
1936
After a long and bloody war the British win a Phyrric Victory in Ireland, remaining in control of the entire island. The Irish Republicn Army contiuues to fight British soldiers and commit acts of teror but thier power is largely diminished.
The British cling desperately to thier empire enacting policies granting many colonies limited self rule while also building up colonial millitary forces.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2016 13:47:41 GMT
Seeing the raising numbers swedes makes their biological weapons laboratories work 24/7 yo bro this ain't 2016? They still haven't even made the hydrogen bomb? Dafuq?!? I said biological not nuclear |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 19, 2016 13:48:49 GMT
Seeing increasingly militaristic views of their northern neighbors Germany builds up a force of 100000 for now that's been stationed in the coastl area. Technically Germany is still under the Treaty of Versailles, so 100,000 would be thier entire army. I recommend you do a post about who's ruling Germany and what's happening to it which will explain the larger millitary. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 19, 2016 13:50:31 GMT
yo bro this ain't 2016? They still haven't even made the hydrogen bomb? Dafuq?!? I said biological not nuclear so you mean to say that biological weapons were made before hydrogen bombs? If yes than Google it. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 19, 2016 13:50:40 GMT
yo bro this ain't 2016? They still haven't even made the hydrogen bomb? Dafuq?!? I said biological not nuclear What I think Napoleon Bonaparte ment by that was biological weapons are a relatively new form of warfare. Yes there were instances of biological weapons earlier and at this time but not large scale. |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 19, 2016 13:54:50 GMT
1936
Sweden developes new land mines and lays them along the coastlines to prevent enemy amphibious landings.
Meanwhile various Norwegian and Danish rebel factions rebel against the Entente government with numerous factions vying for control. Some groups are funded by Sweden and others are funded by Britian who wish to see neither a Swedish dominated Baltic or an Entente dominated Baltic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Laurent de Gouvion on Aug 19, 2016 13:55:54 GMT
I said biological not nuclear so you mean to say that biological weapons were made before hydrogen bombs? If yes than Google it. Biological warfare has existed for ages. I think a Mongol warlord once threw bodies infected with Bubonic Plague to a fortress he was besieging. Even tipping your spear/arrow with poison is biological warfare. Anthrax and Botulinium were main biological weapons at that time. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 19, 2016 13:56:20 GMT
Seeing increasingly militaristic views of their northern neighbors Germany builds up a force of 100000 for now that's been stationed in the coastl area. Technically Germany is still under the Treaty of Versailles, so 100,000 would be thier entire army. I recommend you do a post about who's ruling Germany and what's happening to it which will explain the larger millitary. oh $hit! That thing is still in here! >_< Anyways here's how Germany is divided (ideologically) The East wants monarchy again as the unifying force of Germany, Prussia was in the east. These people wish that Kaiser Wilhelm comes back from the Netherlands. The South is somewhat Socialist (as they're looking up to Bavaria for some reason) . The rest wants democracy. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2016 13:56:48 GMT
It is too ahistorical, soviets tried to do such things and all of those were ended, before even started, don't forget, Swedend and Denmark are monarchies and people highly values their kings Also even if they would make something like what you mentioned, it couldn't hold anything key to weaken entente, as Swedes would very fast deal with situation I'm sorry but I honestly cannot see how what I'm doing is more ahistorical than the Baltic Entente. There is no way that Scandanavia would unite with the much poorer Baltic States. Please stop saying everything I do is ahistorical. Been ahistorical is the whole point of this. I like the idea of the Baltic Allaince but I think it's far more likely that Scandanavia would stand as either its own unified country or its seperate ones. I'm sorry, but you have been very mislead, for example Latvia was richer than Netherlands all the way in 30-. Latvia and Lithuania were in top 10 statistics of Europe for all that time. Scandinavia wasn't one country for huge time already and they didn't want direct conflict, but they weren't neutral just because they wanted, Sweden had biggest bio weaponry industry on earth from ww1 times, and they were forced to destroy their weaponry by ano, later in 70-90ies |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2016 13:58:13 GMT
I said biological not nuclear so you mean to say that biological weapons were made before hydrogen bombs? If yes than Google it. Dude bio weapons were used in ww1 |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Aug 19, 2016 14:00:36 GMT
so you mean to say that biological weapons were made before hydrogen bombs? If yes than Google it. Dude bio weapons were used in ww1 google the definition of biological weapons. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2016 14:01:09 GMT
so you mean to say that biological weapons were made before hydrogen bombs? If yes than Google it. Biological warfare has existed for ages. I think a Mongol warlord once threw bodies infected with Bubonic Plague to a fortress he was besieging. Even tipping your spear/arrow with poison is biological warfare. Anthrax and Botulinium were main biological weapons at that time. And even before it battle at red cliff Bubonic plague was used, but it worked only weakly there |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2016 14:03:14 GMT
Dude bio weapons were used in ww1 google the definition of biological weapons. I don't need to, biological weapon is a weapon which modifies, kills or damages biological organisms Edit not all |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Aug 19, 2016 14:04:54 GMT
I'm sorry but I honestly cannot see how what I'm doing is more ahistorical than the Baltic Entente. There is no way that Scandanavia would unite with the much poorer Baltic States. Please stop saying everything I do is ahistorical. Been ahistorical is the whole point of this. I like the idea of the Baltic Allaince but I think it's far more likely that Scandanavia would stand as either its own unified country or its seperate ones. I'm sorry, but you have been very mislead, for example Latvia was richer than Netherlands all the way in 30-. Latvia and Lithuania were in top 10 statistics of Europe for all that time. Scandinavia wasn't one country for huge time already and they didn't want direct conflict, but they weren't neutral just because they wanted, Sweden had biggest bio weaponry industry on earth from ww1 times, and they were forced to destroy their weaponry by ano, later in 70-90ies The Netherlands don't have anything to do with this? I know Scandanavia wasn't a unified country but there is no way they would join the Baltic States. Sweden was pretty rich especially for its population and although it was neutral they had a pretty strong millitary. Before this gets salty how about we have a war between Sweden/Scandanavian Rebels/Limited Soviet Support vs the Baltic Entente/Britain. In the end there can be a Unified Scandanavia and the Baltic States and Poland remain strong. I feel like this is more realistic. |
|
