|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Oct 1, 2020 7:54:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by muhammadpasha on Oct 1, 2020 8:57:43 GMT
till lvl 26 i had no reward from princess or missions what could be wrong!! |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Mar 3, 2021 18:57:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Mar 4, 2021 8:59:51 GMT
SolidLight already has an amazing guide. I do have some disagreements over artillery generals but overall I'm not quite sure whether continuing this thread is worth it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Jul 7, 2021 17:31:03 GMT
SolidLight already has an amazing guide. I do have some disagreements over artillery generals but overall I'm not quite sure whether continuing this thread is worth it. BTW, what are your thoughts on the artillery. Not to continue the thread necessarily, but in general. |
|
|
|
Post by Voltaire on Jul 13, 2021 0:10:09 GMT
SolidLight already has an amazing guide. I do have some disagreements over artillery generals but overall I'm not quite sure whether continuing this thread is worth it. BTW, what are your thoughts on the artillery. Not to continue the thread necessarily, but in general. I personally do not like artillery except to take towers. I feel like they are very vulnerable on defense and on offense they don't do too much damage in comparison to troops of similar ages. Also generals like Alexander and Caesar can take down walls quite effectively. I think one really good artillery generals is fine in any line up. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Jul 13, 2021 0:20:25 GMT
SolidLight already has an amazing guide. I do have some disagreements over artillery generals but overall I'm not quite sure whether continuing this thread is worth it. BTW, what are your thoughts on the artillery. Not to continue the thread necessarily, but in general. I prefer team contribution to individual strength. So Cleopatra, Bismarck, and Khalid come first. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Aug 22, 2021 9:19:54 GMT
Hey Iron Duke stoic I'm thinking about finishing this up and rework the previous ones a bit. The question now is whether I should make it a mix of everything like the previous guides or specific to each lineup. Which one do you think is better for beginners? |
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Aug 22, 2021 12:41:33 GMT
Hey Iron Duke stoic I'm thinking about finishing this up and rework the previous ones a bit. The question now is whether I should make it a mix of everything like the previous guides or specific to each lineup. Which one do you think is better for beginners? For beginners, probably, an individual approach to each general is more understandable, but, I think, it is not the best one in a long-term perspective. Even new players should have a whole picture in mind, before buying this or that general. Otherwise many of them will purchase a couple of "purple" generals without the slightest idea how to use them properly. |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Aug 22, 2021 13:59:31 GMT
Hey Iron Duke stoic I'm thinking about finishing this up and rework the previous ones a bit. The question now is whether I should make it a mix of everything like the previous guides or specific to each lineup. Which one do you think is better for beginners? I like the style of this one where you have this introduction link and then an individual analysis of each general. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Aug 22, 2021 14:45:34 GMT
Hey Iron Duke stoic I'm thinking about finishing this up and rework the previous ones a bit. The question now is whether I should make it a mix of everything like the previous guides or specific to each lineup. Which one do you think is better for beginners? For beginners, probably, an individual approach to each general is more understandable, but, I think, it is not the best one in a long-term perspective. Even new players should have a whole picture in mind, before buying this or that general. Otherwise many of them will purchase a couple of "purple" generals without the slightest idea how to use them properly. Which is why I'm raising this question. EW5 has the most unique general system in all easytech games. Players could have a whole different set of generals depending on their style of play. The one and only Guderian-Govorov-Patton pathway simply doesn't exist. I think the rainbow color-coding doesn't fit quite well to EW5 in this regard, as there are many lineup-specific generals (Nelson, Asoka, etc.) that will thrive in one lineup and struggle in others. If I want to force that system in, I will have to either making every ok general green or above, which will definitely confuse the beginners, or make it ArchCom oriented, which ruins the diversity of choosing generals, one of the greatest features of EW5. That's why I am planning on making it color coded for different lineups. For example, Jebe could be coded as blue for ArchCom and like orange for others; in that way we can at least give the beginners some idea on whether a general could adapt well into their run instead of telling them to go for Nelson even though they are going InfCom. What I am concerning right now is whether the beginners are comfortable with this, or they just want a simple and straightforward one like the general rankings for other games. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Aug 22, 2021 14:52:25 GMT
Hey Iron Duke stoic I'm thinking about finishing this up and rework the previous ones a bit. The question now is whether I should make it a mix of everything like the previous guides or specific to each lineup. Which one do you think is better for beginners? I like the style of this one where you have this introduction link and then an individual analysis of each general. I'm definitely gonna keep that one. The question now is whether the beginners feel more comfortable if I just tell them if a general purple or orange or narrowing it down to each kind of lineup. |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Duke on Aug 22, 2021 16:25:30 GMT
I like the style of this one where you have this introduction link and then an individual analysis of each general. I'm definitely gonna keep that one. The question now is whether the beginners feel more comfortable if I just tell them if a general purple or orange or narrowing it down to each kind of lineup. I think the colour coded rating on their suitability for each lineup at the end of each general's analysis is a good idea. P.S. I don't know if anything can be done about it, but it irks me when people interrupt your analysis threads with random questions and comments. |
|
|
|
Post by Voltaire on Aug 22, 2021 17:49:41 GMT
I like the style of this one where you have this introduction link and then an individual analysis of each general. I'm definitely gonna keep that one. The question now is whether the beginners feel more comfortable if I just tell them if a general purple or orange or narrowing it down to each kind of lineup. as a beginner, I would feel pretty comfortable with a line-up specific rating system. The only thing I would add is a description of each line-up on top so that they are not confused. |
|
