|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Jun 24, 2020 16:13:16 GMT
He is only 1380, very cheap, so you can save the medals to upgrade him. What I don't like from Mannerheim are elastic defense (although Rundstedt's no different), and he only has one empty slot. To me, raider, guerrilla, and rumor are obligatory on infantry considering their role in the battle field. So it only leaves me with 2 choices: Rundstedt or Yamashita. Mannerheim is too reckless, he doesn't have any defensive skills. Well you can give Mannerheim guerilla or rumor. The thing about guerilla is, you would never want to leave your infantry gen in a place that you would need guerilla (like in front of a heavy tank) so I personally don't like it that much. What I want on infantry is insane damage so I can wreck cities and infantries easily which Mannerheim does well with jungle fighting and high level of raider. Anyways the only places I'm going to use infantry generals are invasions and conquests. Mannerheim=More offensive Rundstedt=More defensive Yeah, but enemies are also stationed in cities, that's why when cracking a city you also need guerrilla, besides there's no harm with making your infantry more combat capable, they can be a nice support too. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Beast on Jun 24, 2020 16:17:18 GMT
Well you can give Mannerheim guerilla or rumor. The thing about guerilla is, you would never want to leave your infantry gen in a place that you would need guerilla (like in front of a heavy tank) so I personally don't like it that much. What I want on infantry is insane damage so I can wreck cities and infantries easily which Mannerheim does well with jungle fighting and high level of raider. Anyways the only places I'm going to use infantry generals are invasions and conquests. Mannerheim=More offensive Rundstedt=More defensive Yeah, but enemies are also stationed in cities, that's why when cracking a city you also need guerrilla, besides there's no harm with making your infantry more combat capable, they can be a nice support too. You're not wrong. But in the end it all depends on your playing style.  |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Jun 24, 2020 16:18:56 GMT
Well you can give Mannerheim guerilla or rumor. The thing about guerilla is, you would never want to leave your infantry gen in a place that you would need guerilla (like in front of a heavy tank) so I personally don't like it that much. What I want on infantry is insane damage so I can wreck cities and infantries easily which Mannerheim does well with jungle fighting and high level of raider. Anyways the only places I'm going to use infantry generals are invasions and conquests. Mannerheim=More offensive Rundstedt=More defensive Yeah, but enemies are also stationed in cities, that's why when cracking a city you also need guerrilla, besides there's no harm with making your infantry more combat capable, they can be a nice support too. And also, infantry generals should be able to survive and inject rumors, not just cracking cities. Because they're combat soldiers too, not just some construction workers😂 |
|
|
|
Post by mrmansterin on Jun 24, 2020 16:22:23 GMT
Yeah, but enemies are also stationed in cities, that's why when cracking a city you also need guerrilla, besides there's no harm with making your infantry more combat capable, they can be a nice support too. And also, infantry generals should be able to survive and inject rumors, not just cracking cities. Because they're combat soldiers too, not just some construction workers😂 Hahahahahaha. <Deep breath>. Hahahahaha |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Beast on Jun 24, 2020 16:53:16 GMT
Yeah, but enemies are also stationed in cities, that's why when cracking a city you also need guerrilla, besides there's no harm with making your infantry more combat capable, they can be a nice support too. And also, infantry generals should be able to survive and inject rumors, not just cracking cities. Because they're combat soldiers too, not just some construction workers😂 That's why I'm planning to add rumor on him. Maybe infantry leader. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 25, 2020 7:56:33 GMT
He is only 1380, very cheap, so you can save the medals to upgrade him. What I don't like from Mannerheim are elastic defense (although Rundstedt's no different), and he only has one empty slot. To me, raider, guerrilla, and rumor are obligatory on infantry considering their role in the battle field. So it only leaves me with 2 choices: Rundstedt or Yamashita. Mannerheim is too reckless, he doesn't have any defensive skills. Well you can give Mannerheim guerilla or rumor. The thing about guerilla is, you would never want to leave your infantry gen in a place that you would need guerilla (like in front of a heavy tank) so I personally don't like it that much. What I want on infantry is insane damage so I can wreck cities and infantries easily which Mannerheim does well with jungle fighting and high level of raider. Anyways the only places I'm going to use infantry generals are invasions and conquests. Mannerheim=More offensive Rundstedt=More defensive Yup well-analyzed. The intention of using infantry counts a lot. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 25, 2020 7:59:15 GMT
Well you can give Mannerheim guerilla or rumor. The thing about guerilla is, you would never want to leave your infantry gen in a place that you would need guerilla (like in front of a heavy tank) so I personally don't like it that much. What I want on infantry is insane damage so I can wreck cities and infantries easily which Mannerheim does well with jungle fighting and high level of raider. Anyways the only places I'm going to use infantry generals are invasions and conquests. Mannerheim=More offensive Rundstedt=More defensive Yeah, but enemies are also stationed in cities, that's why when cracking a city you also need guerrilla, besides there's no harm with making your infantry more combat capable, they can be a nice support too. This is why Yamashita is so strong, for he combines Guerilla with powerful offensive capabilities, not to mention his mobility stats. The lack of rumor is tolerable since my intention when it comes to inf gens is to siege cities, not pit them against tanks |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Jun 25, 2020 10:29:26 GMT
Yeah, but enemies are also stationed in cities, that's why when cracking a city you also need guerrilla, besides there's no harm with making your infantry more combat capable, they can be a nice support too. This is why Yamashita is so strong, for he combines Guerilla with powerful offensive capabilities, not to mention his mobility stats. The lack of rumor is tolerable since my intention when it comes to inf gens is to siege cities, not pit them against tanks Yeah, but cities are often guarded by tanks or other units. Besides, they're fast and some commandos deals extra damage to tanks or infantries. With guerrilla and rumor infantries can be a support unit too. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Beast on Jun 25, 2020 12:40:00 GMT
This is why Yamashita is so strong, for he combines Guerilla with powerful offensive capabilities, not to mention his mobility stats. The lack of rumor is tolerable since my intention when it comes to inf gens is to siege cities, not pit them against tanks Yeah, but cities are often guarded by tanks or other units. Besides, they're fast and some commandos deals extra damage to tanks or infantries. With guerrilla and rumor infantries can be a support unit too. That's why I'm going to use infantry generals to blitz through Siberia, Africa, and America where there isn't usually a tank guarding the city. Usually there might be a light infantry. Btw Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC, what do you think is better on Mannerheim? Infantry leader or Guerilla? |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Jun 25, 2020 12:53:27 GMT
Yeah, but cities are often guarded by tanks or other units. Besides, they're fast and some commandos deals extra damage to tanks or infantries. With guerrilla and rumor infantries can be a support unit too. That's why I'm going to use infantry generals to blitz through Siberia, Africa, and America where there isn't usually a tank guarding the city. Usually there might be a light infantry. Btw Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC , what do you think is better on Mannerheim? Infantry leader or Guerilla? If you ask me, the answer is obvious, rumor. I want to make my infantry general combat capable. But since you have Mannerheim (which has no guerrilla) rumor doesn't work that well. My suggestion is to sell Mannerheim and then buy Rundstedt or Yamashita, give them the guerrilla/raider, and rumor. But if you want to make a fort-cracking infantry gen, then you can buy Yamashita and give him rumor and explosives or explosives and infantry leader, or simply give explosives to Mannerheim, although that's not my play style. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 25, 2020 13:42:16 GMT
For yamashita definitely give him infantry leader and guerilla; gotta make use of his offensive capabilities. I gave explosives to mannherheim, which works just fine. I don't need to have rumor on my infantry generals; just guerilla would suffice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Beast on Jun 25, 2020 14:11:37 GMT
For yamashita definitely give him infantry leader and guerilla; gotta make use of his offensive capabilities. I gave explosives to mannherheim, which works just fine. I don't need to have rumor on my infantry generals; just guerilla would suffice. Oh I forgot bout explosives. I might add that and place Mannerheim on an Australian Commando and see him blast cities and strongholds to shreds. |
|
|
|
Post by Gerd von Rundstedt on Oct 22, 2020 16:18:32 GMT
I say plain fight and rumor. Keep in mind to not upgrade elastic defence. Its a horrible skill Yeah, since he has rumor and guerilla together, he’ll be kind of like Peter in Ew5 Is elastic defense so bad if it is upgraded fully? That is plus 20 health to all fortress units adjacent to you. Rather useful in, say, Polish conquest or NATO 1. I may just be someone who builds forts a lot, but they are good for something, such as watching a city when you are gone, or even just defending your general so he takes less damage. Elastic defense is a horrible skill, but it isn't useless. My two IPCs. (By the way, will GoG 3 have oil. I wish WC4 kept it.)  |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 22, 2020 22:49:18 GMT
Yeah, since he has rumor and guerilla together, he’ll be kind of like Peter in Ew5 Is elastic defense so bad if it is upgraded fully? That is plus 20 health to all fortress units adjacent to you. Rather useful in, say, Polish conquest or NATO 1. I may just be someone who builds forts a lot, but they are good for something, such as watching a city when you are gone, or even just defending your general so he takes less damage. Elastic defense is a horrible skill, but it isn't useless. My two IPCs. (By the way, will GoG 3 have oil. I wish WC4 kept it.) Nah save the medals. Its like upgrading mechanist. Good for entertainment purposes like in conquest worthless elsewhere |
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Oct 23, 2020 4:11:31 GMT
Yeah, since he has rumor and guerilla together, he’ll be kind of like Peter in Ew5 Is elastic defense so bad if it is upgraded fully? That is plus 20 health to all fortress units adjacent to you. Rather useful in, say, Polish conquest or NATO 1. I may just be someone who builds forts a lot, but they are good for something, such as watching a city when you are gone, or even just defending your general so he takes less damage. Elastic defense is a horrible skill, but it isn't useless. My two IPCs. (By the way, will GoG 3 have oil. I wish WC4 kept it.) Yes, it's still quite useless. Why would you need to heal forts? They're already tough and cheap to make. And they hit the same even when their health is low. Also, are you going to put your general near forts all the time? Think about the ammount medals it takes too. |
|
