|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 28, 2019 20:56:16 GMT
I see andrei and stoic kinda like role models. You and Bing too. Deleted is new, but he is the god of great conqueror rome lol. Btw, thanks a lot : ) |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 30, 2019 1:27:06 GMT
Kind of odd how some people say mahmud is terrible outside of the desert. He has 3 great skills, 2 of which are the absolute best in the game, a crit skill, good battle/artillery ability. He is slighty stronger than john on jungle terrain.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 30, 2019 1:58:51 GMT
Mahmud (not on desert tile) vs John Mahmud is emperor rank, having a +16 battle ability advantage over John’s rank, but john has lvl 4 jungle fighting and a +10 artillery ability item. Mahmud in respect has only lvl 3 aura (trash). Its fair to say, john has a slight advantage in terms of his circumstances. No tech level upgrades   Some tech level upgrades.   As you can see, mahmud on a not desert is pretty much the same strength as john, meaning that the same passes when on mountain tiles. Mahmud is very very slightly weaker (due to him not being on the right terrain bonus), which is easily offset by his artillery master skill. Mahmud is very easy to use and a good team member. John is not that. Jungle-mountain tiles occur at best 4% of the time and are a rare sight. The only reason to buy John over mahmud is the “700” medal difference, which people wouldn’t think twice to sacrifice on purchasing Nelson over Treville. Mahmud II >> John, but whether the difference is worth 700 medals is the real question. |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 30, 2019 20:46:12 GMT
Deleted is new, but he is the god of great conqueror rome lol. Btw, thanks a lot : ) Well,I have Napoleon along with John and Jordan. Witch makes Mahmud rather usless in my case. But can see see Mahmud/John being an interesting alternative.😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 31, 2019 0:50:55 GMT
Well,I have Napoleon along with John and Jordan. Witch makes Mahmud rather usless in my case. But can see see Mahmud/John being an interesting alternative.😁 I went the all aura buff general route with iaps personally Cavarly: Blucher, Murat, Dabrowski Infantry: Karl, Massena, very rarely Wellesley Artillery: Mahmud, Alexander I, Napoleon Navy: Nelson (I kind of regret purchasing him even tho I bought him last. probably barclay would have been a better option. I personally had no complaints whatsover, That is imo the easiest way to beat the game. Maybe even debatably the best. That way, the weakest generals on your team still hit very hard, and your strongest generals are buffed. I always used mahmud and alex on rocket artillery when I could. But fair enough I guess. Jourdan will eventually have to go tho |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 7, 2019 1:07:48 GMT
Well,I have Napoleon along with John and Jordan. Witch makes Mahmud rather usless in my case. But can see see Mahmud/John being an interesting alternative.😁 I went the all aura buff general route with iaps personally Cavarly: Blucher, Murat, Dabrowski Infantry: Karl, Massena, very rarely Wellesley Artillery: Mahmud, Alexander I, Napoleon Navy: Nelson (I kind of regret purchasing him even tho I bought him last. probably barclay would have been a better option. I personally had no complaints whatsover, That is imo the easiest way to beat the game. Maybe even debatably the best. That way, the weakest generals on your team still hit very hard, and your strongest generals are buffed. I always used mahmud and alex on rocket artillery when I could. But fair enough I guess. Jourdan will eventually have to go tho Blucher and Napoleon are extremely good, but this game has a far faster farming method than WC4 and thus I’m willing to do a non-IAP run. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 7, 2019 3:08:44 GMT
I went the all aura buff general route with iaps personally Cavarly: Blucher, Murat, Dabrowski Infantry: Karl, Massena, very rarely Wellesley Artillery: Mahmud, Alexander I, Napoleon Navy: Nelson (I kind of regret purchasing him even tho I bought him last. probably barclay would have been a better option. I personally had no complaints whatsover, That is imo the easiest way to beat the game. Maybe even debatably the best. That way, the weakest generals on your team still hit very hard, and your strongest generals are buffed. I always used mahmud and alex on rocket artillery when I could. But fair enough I guess. Jourdan will eventually have to go tho Blucher and Napoleon are extremely good, but this game has a far faster farming method than WC4 and thus I’m willing to do a non-IAP run. Yeah I started out just on august 24th. Despite the majority of my time being sucked out by school, I almost have a fully upgraded Murat and have Massena at lvl 5 inf master  |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 29, 2019 13:19:52 GMT
Mahmud (not on desert tile) vs John Mahmud is emperor rank, having a +16 battle ability advantage over John’s rank, but john has lvl 4 jungle fighting and a +10 artillery ability item. Mahmud in respect has only lvl 3 aura (trash). Its fair to say, john has a slight advantage in terms of his circumstances. No tech level upgrades Some tech level upgrades. As you can see, mahmud on a not desert is pretty much the same strength as john, meaning that the same passes when on mountain tiles. Mahmud is very very slightly weaker (due to him not being on the right terrain bonus), which is easily offset by his artillery master skill. Mahmud is very easy to use and a good team member. John is not that. Jungle-mountain tiles occur at best 4% of the time and are a rare sight. The only reason to buy John over mahmud is the “700” medal difference, which people wouldn’t think twice to sacrifice on purchasing Nelson over Treville. Mahmud II >> John, but whether the difference is worth 700 medals is the real question. Can I live with just Mahmud II and Sophia as Artillery generals? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 29, 2019 13:23:41 GMT
Mahmud (not on desert tile) vs John Mahmud is emperor rank, having a +16 battle ability advantage over John’s rank, but john has lvl 4 jungle fighting and a +10 artillery ability item. Mahmud in respect has only lvl 3 aura (trash). Its fair to say, john has a slight advantage in terms of his circumstances. No tech level upgrades Some tech level upgrades. As you can see, mahmud on a not desert is pretty much the same strength as john, meaning that the same passes when on mountain tiles. Mahmud is very very slightly weaker (due to him not being on the right terrain bonus), which is easily offset by his artillery master skill. Mahmud is very easy to use and a good team member. John is not that. Jungle-mountain tiles occur at best 4% of the time and are a rare sight. The only reason to buy John over mahmud is the “700” medal difference, which people wouldn’t think twice to sacrifice on purchasing Nelson over Treville. Mahmud II >> John, but whether the difference is worth 700 medals is the real question. Can I live with just Mahmud II and Sophia as Artillery generals? Definitely. But you might need to use both on rocket artillery primarily. But yes you can. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 29, 2019 13:26:17 GMT
Can I live with just Mahmud II and Sophia as Artillery generals? Definitely. But you might need to use both on rocket artillery primarily. But yes you can. Great. Now I won’t have to buy more slots since I will have 1 for Sakurako. Well, maybe I will have to spend a dollar to buy one slot for Nelson. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 29, 2019 13:28:32 GMT
Definitely. But you might need to use both on rocket artillery primarily. But yes you can. Great. Now I won’t have to buy more slots since I will have 1 for Sakurako. Well, maybe I will have to spend a dollar to buy one slot for Nelson. No worries. Once you get to a point where you can’t proceed, only then make rearrangements. But yes one extra slot is a very cheap but effective way to fill in your team’s gaps. But once crimean war comes, you will find yourselves trading generals back and forth |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 29, 2019 13:30:58 GMT
Great. Now I won’t have to buy more slots since I will have 1 for Sakurako. Well, maybe I will have to spend a dollar to buy one slot for Nelson. No worries. Once you get to a point where you can’t proceed, only then make rearrangements. But yes one extra slot is a very cheap but effective way to fill in your team’s gaps. But once crimean war comes, you will find yourselves trading generals back and forth Unless I buy Blucher to serve as a cavalry general, which I’m seriously considering. If I buy him, I won’t have to sell a cavalry general because then I can just get Lan who is better than Dabrowski. True, there’s aura, but I don’t believe that buying a cavalry general just for support is a good idea, since they are made to attack. I was going for a non-IAP run in the beginning, but sometimes buying a IAP is actually a good idea in the sense of strategy. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 29, 2019 13:36:42 GMT
No worries. Once you get to a point where you can’t proceed, only then make rearrangements. But yes one extra slot is a very cheap but effective way to fill in your team’s gaps. But once crimean war comes, you will find yourselves trading generals back and forth Unless I buy Blucher to serve as a cavalry general, which I’m seriously considering. If I buy him, I won’t have to sell a cavalry general because then I can just get Lan who is better than Dabrowski. True, there’s aura, but I don’t believe that buying a cavalry general just for support is a good idea, since they are made to attack. I was going for a non-IAP run in the beginning, but sometimes buying a IAP is actually a good idea in the sense of strategy. I actually clicked restore my purchases and am playing with iaps now. I’d wait till you have a fully upgraded massena than do it. Otherwise you will find yourself in a bad situation as it is ideal to farm the neds with murat and massena. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 29, 2019 13:56:33 GMT
Unless I buy Blucher to serve as a cavalry general, which I’m seriously considering. If I buy him, I won’t have to sell a cavalry general because then I can just get Lan who is better than Dabrowski. True, there’s aura, but I don’t believe that buying a cavalry general just for support is a good idea, since they are made to attack. I was going for a non-IAP run in the beginning, but sometimes buying a IAP is actually a good idea in the sense of strategy. I actually clicked restore my purchases and am playing with iaps now. I’d wait till you have a fully upgraded massena than do it. Otherwise you will find yourself in a bad situation as it is ideal to farm the neds with murat and massena. Well, I could also buy 2000 medals, but I prefer not to. Why would I find myself in a bad situation if I buy Blucher? I'm nowhere near as close to having a maxed Massena because I haven’t even bought him. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 29, 2019 14:02:41 GMT
I actually clicked restore my purchases and am playing with iaps now. I’d wait till you have a fully upgraded massena than do it. Otherwise you will find yourself in a bad situation as it is ideal to farm the neds with murat and massena. Well, I could also buy 2000 medals, but I prefer not to. Why would I find myself in a bad situation if I buy Blucher? I'm nowhere near as close to having a maxed Massena because I haven’t even bought him. Its easier if you just wait till you have massena than buy iaps. Its easier to farm the neds. But if you want to buy blucher, go for it. Its only 10$ |
|
