|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 16, 2019 0:34:23 GMT
I would choose these 3: Murat (He is a beast), Davout (Solo-ing he is pretty solid and good), and Lan (Hybrid between Murat and Blucher). If you are IAP, choose Blucher ast well, he is superb.
Dabrosky is also very good, but I see him one step below these 4 guys mentioned above.
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on May 16, 2019 6:05:31 GMT
I would choose these 3: Murat (He is a beast), Davout (Solo-ing he is pretty solid and good), and Lan (Hybrid between Murat and Blucher). If you are IAP, choose Blucher ast well, he is superb.
Dabrosky is also very good, but I see him one step below these 4 guys mentioned above.
There is an old andrei's thread (european-war-4.boards.net/thread/9858/real-gens-comparison). It was established beyond any reasonable doubt that aura generals are not only great team players but also the strongest individual players among his rivals (Just compare Dabrowsi and Davout) |
|
|
|
Post by cojoncio on May 23, 2019 2:21:16 GMT
I would choose these 3: Murat (He is a beast), Davout (Solo-ing he is pretty solid and good), and Lan (Hybrid between Murat and Blucher). If you are IAP, choose Blucher ast well, he is superb.
Dabrosky is also very good, but I see him one step below these 4 guys mentioned above.
There is an old andrei 's thread (european-war-4.boards.net/thread/9858/real-gens-comparison). It was established beyond any reasonable doubt that aura generals are not only great team players but also the strongest individual players among his rivals (Just compare Dabrowsi and Davout) Yes, Davout might have less attack than Dabrowski, but looking at his skills, imo is much much better than Dabrowski. But again, is a matter of personal taste  |
|
|
|
Post by Navia Lanoira on May 23, 2019 4:45:22 GMT
Station, eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by stoic on May 23, 2019 4:59:43 GMT
There is an old andrei 's thread (european-war-4.boards.net/thread/9858/real-gens-comparison). It was established beyond any reasonable doubt that aura generals are not only great team players but also the strongest individual players among his rivals (Just compare Dabrowsi and Davout) Yes, Davout might have less attack than Dabrowski, but looking at his skills, imo is much much better than Dabrowski. But again, is a matter of personal taste May I know what exactly is "much" better than 1. Cavalry Commander. Inarguably the best skill (attack bonus for a general himself and all units of the same type nearby). 2. Plain fighting. The second best skill. 3. Surprise attack (additional damage bonus up to 20% depending on a distance)? |
|
|
|
Post by Seger on May 23, 2019 5:54:51 GMT
Yes, Davout might have less attack than Dabrowski, but looking at his skills, imo is much much better than Dabrowski. But again, is a matter of personal taste May I know what exactly is "much" better than 1. Cavalry Commander. Inarguably the best skill (attack bonus for a general himself and all units of the same type nearby). 2. Plain fighting. The second best skill. 3. Surprise attack (additional damage bonus up to 20% depending on a distance)? if we look at the skills station vs plain fighting: why station it sucks it's a defensive skill something wich isn't useful for a cavalry gen Edge vs aura: aura does more damage not only on infantry Surprise attack vs riding master: surprise attack can do +20% and not only with critic attack Tactic master vs nothing: tactic master isn't that good for a cavalry gen. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Aug 23, 2019 1:22:41 GMT
Paget is a good general, but Ney is cheaper and better than him, while also being an end-game General. Still, Paget is not bad at all. I rate him 4 stars.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 2, 2019 20:42:22 GMT
Paget is a good general, but Ney is cheaper and better than him, while also being an end-game General. Still, Paget is not bad at all. I rate him 4 stars. Hmm. Actually I was just thinking what if he is a better starting general than ney. For ney, trade riding master for surprise, both of which are really good, and tactics master for plain fighting. He is a pretty solid starting general honestly. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 2, 2019 20:44:35 GMT
Paget is a good general, but Ney is cheaper and better than him, while also being an end-game General. Still, Paget is not bad at all. I rate him 4 stars. Hmm. Actually I was just thinking what if he is a better starting general than ney. For ney, trade riding master for surprise, both of which are really good, and tactics master for plain fighting. He is a pretty solid starting general honestly. But why him when Ney is cheaper? |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 2, 2019 20:49:32 GMT
Hmm. Actually I was just thinking what if he is a better starting general than ney. For ney, trade riding master for surprise, both of which are really good, and tactics master for plain fighting. He is a pretty solid starting general honestly. But why him when Ney is cheaper? Since for a beginner you can stick on an ambulance and a flintlock on him. You will deal huge damage towards artillery and infantry units, way more than Ney |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 2, 2019 22:06:16 GMT
But why him when Ney is cheaper? Since for a beginner you can stick on an ambulance and a flintlock on him. You will deal huge damage towards artillery and infantry units, way more than Ney That makes sense. But so far I’m very happy with Murat. The next general that I’m getting is Massena. But since I’ve already reached a point in EW6 where I’m fine, I’m focusing now on WC4. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 2, 2019 22:10:14 GMT
Since for a beginner you can stick on an ambulance and a flintlock on him. You will deal huge damage towards artillery and infantry units, way more than Ney That makes sense. But so far I’m very happy with Murat. The next general that I’m getting is Massena. But since I’ve already reached a point in EW6 where I’m fine, I’m focusing now on WC4. Noice. Yeah same. I am steadily improving some of my generals while waiting for the gcr update. I agree, murat is a very strong starting general. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 2, 2019 22:12:10 GMT
That makes sense. But so far I’m very happy with Murat. The next general that I’m getting is Massena. But since I’ve already reached a point in EW6 where I’m fine, I’m focusing now on WC4. Noice. Yeah same. I am steadily improving some of my generals while waiting for the gcr update. I agree, murat is a very strong starting general. Not only starting, he’s amazing overall. He’s so good that selling him for medals result in a medal loss. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 2, 2019 23:11:52 GMT
Noice. Yeah same. I am steadily improving some of my generals while waiting for the gcr update. I agree, murat is a very strong starting general. Not only starting, he’s amazing overall. He’s so good that selling him for medals result in a medal loss. Why sell murat? He is the best general in the game. He hits harder than blucher. He has 4 skills work well against any unit. Than there is manuever, that almost never triggers even at 100% |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 3, 2019 0:04:18 GMT
Not only starting, he’s amazing overall. He’s so good that selling him for medals result in a medal loss. Why sell murat? He is the best general in the game. He hits harder than blucher. He has 4 skills work well against any unit. Than there is manuever, that almost never triggers even at 100% Yeah, why selling Murat, right? Maneuver only doesn’t trigger because you hardly encounter barriers. But I can imagine those things being annoying. |
|
