|
Post by andrei on Jul 22, 2018 12:05:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 22, 2018 12:08:04 GMT
I defeated Britain in 34 turns this time, the The next turn Russia was defeated. And guess what? : World record how long Portugal can hold the ground
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 22, 2018 12:13:09 GMT
stoic, that's just hilarious
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 22, 2018 12:13:44 GMT
andrei, soon enough I will have two other cav generals more and I will accept the challenge
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 22, 2018 12:19:37 GMT
Someone got 294,000 points in 1798 last June 30 in the IOS Game Center leaderboards Such hardcore players... Or cheaters IOS update was released in July, so your suspicions are well grounded
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 22, 2018 13:17:56 GMT
I suppose we have to ask best75 or NetherFreek to create a thread similar to that, what we had in WC4 european-war-4.boards.net/thread/7072/world-conqueror-4-records. It is really a unique situation when IOS and Android users, those with IAP generals and those without them are in one boat in some sense, because all release dates were very close to each other for the first time. Otherwise I remember that when I was ready to beat andrei's WC4 records, he lost his interest already And I understand him, because WC4 (though a solid project) was not that kind of game you will play over and over again, after you completed it. But now it could be fun
|
|
|
Post by Nobunaga Oda on Jul 22, 2018 14:53:26 GMT
How did Vienna fall, you ask? Well, Austria destroyed Poland so (cue Sabaton's Winged Hussars) "THE WINGED HUSSARS HAD DIED" "Charging North, Austria turned the tide!" "We remember, in October, When the Winged Hussars had died!" And thus, the Winged Hussars would be unable to turn the tide in Vienna.
|
|
|
Post by best75 on Jul 23, 2018 0:15:10 GMT
I suppose we have to ask best75 or NetherFreek to create a thread similar to that, what we had in WC4 european-war-4.boards.net/thread/7072/world-conqueror-4-records. It is really a unique situation when IOS and Android users, those with IAP generals and those without them are in one boat in some sense, because all release dates were very close to each other for the first time. Otherwise I remember that when I was ready to beat andrei 's WC4 records, he lost his interest already And I understand him, because WC4 (though a solid project) was not that kind of game you will play over and over again, after you completed it. But now it could be fun Indeed those are very fast conquest. I actually didn't exact Netherlands, a 1 star country to be giving the fastest conquests. I would had expected a 3 star country since they start with more resources. NetherFreek is usually the one to create the record threads so i will see if he wants to make one.
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 23, 2018 6:59:53 GMT
I suppose we have to ask best75 or NetherFreek to create a thread similar to that, what we had in WC4 european-war-4.boards.net/thread/7072/world-conqueror-4-records. It is really a unique situation when IOS and Android users, those with IAP generals and those without them are in one boat in some sense, because all release dates were very close to each other for the first time. Otherwise I remember that when I was ready to beat andrei 's WC4 records, he lost his interest already And I understand him, because WC4 (though a solid project) was not that kind of game you will play over and over again, after you completed it. But now it could be fun Indeed those are very fast conquest. I actually didn't exact Netherlands, a 1 star country to be giving the fastest conquests. I would had expected a 3 star country since they start with more resources. That's because 3 star country, for example, France spawns a lot of strong generals during the conquest if under AI control what contributes the overall power of Your side dramatically. And when You play 3 star country You simply lose all those gens on Your side...
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 23, 2018 7:33:40 GMT
Indeed those are very fast conquest. I actually didn't exact Netherlands, a 1 star country to be giving the fastest conquests. I would had expected a 3 star country since they start with more resources. That's because 3 star country, for example, France spawns a lot of strong generals during the conquest if under AI control what contributes the overall power of Your side dramatically. And when You play 3 star country You simply lose all those gens on Your side... It is not always the case, though. For example, Spain 1812... Spanish generals are weak (and their number is insignificant), and they make no real difference when they appear later in the game.
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 23, 2018 7:41:40 GMT
That's because 3 star country, for example, France spawns a lot of strong generals during the conquest if under AI control what contributes the overall power of Your side dramatically. And when You play 3 star country You simply lose all those gens on Your side... It is not always the case, though. For example, Spain 1812... Spanish generals are weak (and their number is insignificant), and they make no real difference when they appear later in the game. True, but Spain 1812 is the weakest 3* country. It has same size as Algeria and the only reason why it is 3* is its generals imo
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 23, 2018 8:51:19 GMT
It is not always the case, though. For example, Spain 1812... Spanish generals are weak (and their number is insignificant), and they make no real difference when they appear later in the game. True, but Spain 1812 is the weakest 3* country. It has same size as Algeria and the only reason why it is 3* is its generals imo Their budgets are different too, but OK, another example Russia 1812. A significant number of her generals are available at the beginning. Only Durova, Ermolov and a couple more are missing...
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 23, 2018 9:40:35 GMT
True, but Spain 1812 is the weakest 3* country. It has same size as Algeria and the only reason why it is 3* is its generals imo Their budgets are different too, but OK, another example Russia 1812. A significant number of her generals are available at the beginning. Only Durova, Ermolov and a couple more are missing... Vorontsov, Tolstoy, Durova, Ermolov, Benningsen, Witgenstein, Tormasov More than enough The reason why 1812 is not same fast and easy for 1* country as 1798 or 1806 is because 1* countries have very bad geopolitical and geographical position
|
|
|
Post by stoic on Jul 23, 2018 11:59:14 GMT
Their budgets are different too, but OK, another example Russia 1812. A significant number of her generals are available at the beginning. Only Durova, Ermolov and a couple more are missing... Vorontsov, Tolstoy, Durova, Ermolov, Benningsen, Witgenstein, Tormasov More than enough The reason why 1812 is not same fast and easy for 1* country as 1798 or 1806 is because 1* countries have very bad geopolitical and geographical position Yeah that's true. No one is near Denmark and Ottomans at the same time ... And you have to cross the map anyway... Ps Wittgenstein is near St.Petersburg and Benningsen is near Moscow btw
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Jul 23, 2018 13:25:20 GMT
andrei , soon enough I will have two other cav generals more and I will accept the challenge Repeated with a bit higher total score
|
|