|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 12, 2019 0:26:51 GMT
Good strategy. Lets separate ew6 into 3 phases. I would probably not think as far ahead into crimean war and worry about beating pre crimean war as well. Phase 1: Campaign phase 0-6 generals. This is the phase in which you will acquire a team of 6 of your best generals. It ends once you beat everything in the game that has a general cap of 6 generals. Ends once Roman Reunification is beat. -Beating it allows for all of the challenges to the Spanish challenge to be relatively easy. Also makes 1798 and 1806 conquest beatable. Maybe 1812. Phase 2: Conquest phase 2-8 generals. This is the phase where you will have to beat all of the conquests with a particular nation. It is a good phase to try to finish up as early as possible so that farming is much easier to do. -Beating it allows you push all the way up to the crimean war campaign. You will beat 97% of the entire game once this phase ends. Phase 3: Crimean War 8-16 generals. This is the phase where you will beat the game and have the strongest team imaginable. I would worry about completing phase 1 and phase 2 before phase 3 It seems I beat 50% of Phase 2 because I’m done with 1798 and 1812. Spanish War and Hundred Days War belong to which phase? Phase 2. I’d be careful with those two. Especially hundred days war. It is the second hardest thing in the game, the first being crimean war. I’d personally go through, complete everything, than do those two. Also pay attention to your medals. Once you run out, you will have to sell some of your fully upgraded generals to get more non fully upgraded generals. Which is a huge pain |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 12, 2019 0:28:11 GMT
Good strategy. Lets separate ew6 into 3 phases. I would probably not think as far ahead into crimean war and worry about beating pre crimean war as well. Phase 1: Campaign phase 0-6 generals. This is the phase in which you will acquire a team of 6 of your best generals. It ends once you beat everything in the game that has a general cap of 6 generals. Ends once Roman Reunification is beat. -Beating it allows for all of the challenges to the Spanish challenge to be relatively easy. Also makes 1798 and 1806 conquest beatable. Maybe 1812. Phase 2: Conquest phase 2-8 generals. This is the phase where you will have to beat all of the conquests with a particular nation. It is a good phase to try to finish up as early as possible so that farming is much easier to do. -Beating it allows you push all the way up to the crimean war campaign. You will beat 97% of the entire game once this phase ends. Phase 3: Crimean War 8-16 generals. This is the phase where you will beat the game and have the strongest team imaginable. I would worry about completing phase 1 and phase 2 before phase 3 It seems I beat 50% of Phase 2 because I’m done with 1798 and 1812. Spanish War and Hundred Days War belong to which phase? Screw it, I am bored. Traded in alexander and mahmud. Will buy them later. I am going to catch up to where you are. How far did you get in ew6? |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 12, 2019 2:33:10 GMT
Screw it, I am bored. Traded in alexander and mahmud. Will buy them later. I am going to catch up to where you are. How far did you get in ew6? First, thanks for the warning. I indeed plan on completing my campaign roster, the campaign and Prussian War before starting Spanish War and consequently Hundred Days, aside from 1812 and 1815. You're probably further in the game than me. I have completed all of the campaigns missions until the last one of British Empire. Not because I’m stuck, but because I wanted to finish maxing my British tech (Already done) and maxing Massena. Completed 1798, 1806, French Revolutionary War and Expedition to Egypt. I have a maxed Murat and a maxed Blucher, currently upgrading Massena. Waiting until I have Karl to complete the rest of Prussian War. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Oct 12, 2019 2:56:38 GMT
Screw it, I am bored. Traded in alexander and mahmud. Will buy them later. I am going to catch up to where you are. How far did you get in ew6? First, thanks for the warning. I indeed plan on completing my campaign roster, the campaign and Prussian War before starting Spanish War and consequently Hundred Days, aside from 1812 and 1815. You're probably further in the game than me. I have completed all of the campaigns missions until the last one of British Empire. Not because I’m stuck, but because I wanted to finish maxing my British tech (Already done) and maxing Massena. Completed 1798, 1806, French Revolutionary War and Expedition to Egypt. I have a maxed Murat and a maxed Blucher, currently upgrading Massena. Waiting until I have Karl to complete the rest of Prussian War. Nice! You might need napoleon upgraded too for the prussian campaign (definitely german reunification). You get to use the krupp cannon which is bizarrely overpowered. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 12, 2019 3:37:44 GMT
First, thanks for the warning. I indeed plan on completing my campaign roster, the campaign and Prussian War before starting Spanish War and consequently Hundred Days, aside from 1812 and 1815. You're probably further in the game than me. I have completed all of the campaigns missions until the last one of British Empire. Not because I’m stuck, but because I wanted to finish maxing my British tech (Already done) and maxing Massena. Completed 1798, 1806, French Revolutionary War and Expedition to Egypt. I have a maxed Murat and a maxed Blucher, currently upgrading Massena. Waiting until I have Karl to complete the rest of Prussian War. Nice! You might need napoleon upgraded too for the prussian campaign (definitely german reunification). You get to use the krupp cannon which is bizarrely overpowered. Nice. My Napoleon will probably be at least somewhat upgraded when I reach German Reunification. He doesn’t take long to upgrade. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Oct 30, 2019 23:37:44 GMT
SolidLight, the best palace princesses are Sophia, Louise and Maria, correct?
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Nov 2, 2019 12:44:52 GMT
SolidLight, the best palace princesses are Sophia, Louise and Maria, correct? Yes |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Nov 9, 2019 13:52:28 GMT
SolidLight , the best palace princesses are Sophia, Louise and Maria, correct? Yes Thanks, Paulus! |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Nov 9, 2019 14:04:41 GMT
Has anyone ever tried to complete this game using only Emperor generals? I believe that it’s doable.
Infantry:
Karl, Washington and Bolivar. Karl is amazing, Washington is great, Bolivar is good.
Cavalry:
Blucher, Lan and Isabela. Blucher and Lan are amazing, however Isabela is mediocre. She’s basically Davout without his attacking skills (Precision Strike and Edge), which means that her damage is considerably lower.
Artillery:
Napoleon, Mahmud II and Alexander I. Probably the best combination out of all 4 since those three can reach Emperor and are also Aura generals. Artillery might not be spammable, but Aura is Aura.
Navy:
Nelson, Sakurako and Victoria. Nelson and Sakurako are amazing. Victoria is the worst of them, but she is good, better than Hood (Rhyme not intended).
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Nov 9, 2019 14:13:30 GMT
Has anyone ever tried to complete this game using only Emperor generals? I believe that it’s doable. Infantry: Karl, Washington and Bolivar. Karl is amazing, Washington is great, Bolivar is good. Cavalry: Blucher, Lan and Isabela. Blucher and Lan are amazing, however Isabela is mediocre. She’s basically Davout without his attacking skills (Precision Strike and Edge), which means that her damage is considerably lower. Artillery: Napoleon, Mahmud II and Alexander I. Probably the best combination out of all 4 since those three can reach Emperor and are also Aura generals. Artillery might not be spammanle, but Aura is Aura. Navy: Nelson, Sakurako and Victoria. Nelson and Sakurako are amazing. Victoria is the worst of them, but she is good, better than Hood (Rhyme not intended). It's totally doable and maybe even possible to beat Crimean War with that team, but what exactly is the purpose of building a team of emperors? |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Nov 9, 2019 14:31:33 GMT
Has anyone ever tried to complete this game using only Emperor generals? I believe that it’s doable. Infantry: Karl, Washington and Bolivar. Karl is amazing, Washington is great, Bolivar is good. Cavalry: Blucher, Lan and Isabela. Blucher and Lan are amazing, however Isabela is mediocre. She’s basically Davout without his attacking skills (Precision Strike and Edge), which means that her damage is considerably lower. Artillery: Napoleon, Mahmud II and Alexander I. Probably the best combination out of all 4 since those three can reach Emperor and are also Aura generals. Artillery might not be spammanle, but Aura is Aura. Navy: Nelson, Sakurako and Victoria. Nelson and Sakurako are amazing. Victoria is the worst of them, but she is good, better than Hood (Rhyme not intended). It's totally doable and maybe even possible to beat Crimean War with that team, but what exactly is the purpose of building a team of emperors? Some people think that an Emperor general = God General. I know that is false, because a general being Emperor doesn’t immediately mean that he is amazing. But here's a team for those people that like having one where all members have max nobility. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Nov 11, 2019 23:02:27 GMT
It's totally doable and maybe even possible to beat Crimean War with that team, but what exactly is the purpose of building a team of emperors? Some people think that an Emperor general = God General. I know that is false, because a general being Emperor doesn’t immediately mean that he is amazing. But here's a team for those people that like having one where all members have max nobility. King is just as good. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Nov 11, 2019 23:46:10 GMT
Some people think that an Emperor general = God General. I know that is false, because a general being Emperor doesn’t immediately mean that he is amazing. But here's a team for those people that like having one where all members have max nobility. King is just as good. Yup. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Nov 13, 2019 21:43:07 GMT
I believe that completing the game with France's best generals is possible:
Massena, Lannes and Moreau for Infantry (Moreau is arguably better than Suchet. He’s Garibaldi without Tunnel. While it does make him not that good of a sieger, Moreau has nevertheless 3 good skills and can reach Prince. Meanwhile Suchet has Battle Array and Cover instead, which are both pretty bad skills. Even if Cover is decent, I believe that Tactics Master is better. Not to mention that Suchet costs a considerable amount of medals more than Moreau)
Murat, Davout and Ney for Cavalry (All 3 are great cavalry generals, being among the best in the game.)
Napoleon, Napoleon III and Macmahon for Artillery (Napoleon III and Macmahon are sadly not among the best Artillery generals. They aren’t bad at all, though.)
Treville and Villeneuve for Navy (Villeneuve is meh, but thankfully Treville saves the day by being better than every other navy general there is except Nelson and Sakurako.)
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Nov 13, 2019 22:20:37 GMT
I believe that completing the game with France's best generals is possible: Massena, Lannes and Moreau for Infantry (Moreau is arguably better than Suchet. He’s Garibaldi without Tunnel. While it does make him not that good of a sieger, Moreau has nevertheless 3 good skills and can reach Prince. Meanwhile Suchet has Battle Array and Cover instead, which are both pretty bad skills. Even if Cover is decent, I believe that Tactics Master is better. Not to mention that Suchet costs a considerable amount of medals more than Moreau) Murat, Davout and Ney for Cavalry (All 3 are great cavalry generals, being among the best in the game.) Napoleon, Napoleon III and Macmahon for Artillery (Napoleon III and Macmahon are sadly not among the best Artillery generals. They aren’t bad at all, though.) Treville and Villeneuve for Navy (Villeneuve is meh, but thankfully Treville saves the day by being better than every other navy general there is except Nelson and Sakurako.) Moreau is better than Suchet? Debatable. Neither of them are particularily great at sieging, but Suchet probably contributes more in a fight since he’s got higher consistent damage and much better survivability (which also in a way translates into damage). |
|
