|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 13:52:26 GMT
After I posted Suvorov's analysis there, the Chinese players are surprised about the knowledge this forum as about the games. I will state their comments under. p.s.: None of them are from me, they are all from the other Chinese players. I am only the postman. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 13:58:20 GMT
1. Accurate, Bugle, Strike are great skills a general could have because they ingores avoiding.
2. Ballistics, Mobility, Infantry Tactic are useless because they cannot deal extra damage.
3. Leadership is a good skill that allows generals strike straight to the enemies without falling morale.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 14:14:44 GMT
1. Sakurako is not weak, she can be on an artillery and support her allies around when attacking.
2. If Washington is behind, it means that you cares about Assault Tactic more, but why Paget with Assault Tactic is way behind?
3. Murat cannot be the only tier-1 cavalry, he should at least be with Berthier, Dombrowsky and Radetzky.
4. The only thing that Wittgenstein has is star.
5. Berthier is not an artillery general, he is one of the best cavalry after putting tons of medals in it.
6. Sulkowsky is the best fortress cracker cavalry without counting tier-3, there's no "one of".
7. Drummond cannot beat Yermolov except cracking fortresses.
8. Ushakov is the only tier-2 general good at both artillery and navy. Collingwood has no skills on artillery.
9. Soult is an infantry-artillery general, which is better than Napoleon.
10. Grouchy cannot be better than Scharnhorst.
11. Savary is better than Ney if they are not attacking someone in a city.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 15, 2015 14:26:11 GMT
Berthier is a beast when you put 3600 MEDALS into him but Golitsyn is a god when you buy him for 800. So why is Berthier better than Golitsyn?
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 14:50:58 GMT
Berthier is a beast when you put 3600 MEDALS into him but Golitsyn is a god when you buy him for 800. So why is Berthier better than Golitsyn? Answer: By Geography, Berthier can run 6 hex maximum, so he can surround the enemy to drop their morale, can Golitzyn do that? |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 15, 2015 15:03:24 GMT
If you train him some movement and get him a saddle then yeah probably. And going 6 hexes isnt worth 3600 medals imo
|
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Nov 15, 2015 15:18:41 GMT
If you train him some movement and get him a saddle then yeah probably. And going 6 hexes isnt worth 3600 medals imo true, who would waste 3600 medals on him anyway? |
|
|
|
Post by General William T. Sherman on Nov 15, 2015 15:27:49 GMT
I think we shouldn't look at generals solely on skill, because the generals that are fantastic cost enough medals to make us go bankrupt. So therefore, cost effectiveness is also very important. Six movement won't make us pay 3600 medals.
|
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 19:13:18 GMT
Answer: If it can be very strong, then it worths high cost. When you are trying to decreasing turns for Victoria and Lan, you will know the good of Berthier. And even if you think Berthier is too expensive, Golitzyn is the last slot general, then you should buy Sulkowsky, why buying Ney? If you don't have Berthier, at least you should use Sulkowsky and Scharnhorst. If you are buying Ney, you don't understand either Siege Master or Mobility.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 15, 2015 19:22:16 GMT
No generals is worth 3600 medals because they have 1 skill or 2 that are better than a way cheaper general. It's not cost-effective at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Nov 15, 2015 19:22:37 GMT
And if Geography is what makes him so good then buy a war horse.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrei on Nov 15, 2015 19:52:41 GMT
Answer: If it can be very strong, then it worths high cost. When you are trying to decreasing turns for Victoria and Lan, you will know the good of Berthier. And even if you think Berthier is too expensive, Golitzyn is the last slot general, then you should buy Sulkowsky, why buying Ney? If you don't have Berthier, at least you should use Sulkowsky and Scharnhorst. If you are buying Ney, you don't understand either Siege Master or Mobility. And what is it about Siege Master skill? There is actually a thread on the forum regarding this skill: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/48/work-progress-siege-master-skillAnd what excatly do chinese players specify about this particular skill? |
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 15, 2015 19:58:08 GMT
1. Accurate, Bugle, Strike are great skills a general could have because they ingores avoiding. 2. Ballistics, Mobility, Infantry Tactic are useless because they cannot deal extra damage. 3. Leadership is a good skill that allows generals strike straight to the enemies without falling morale. Leadership is great in this mission  |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2015 19:58:30 GMT
Answer: If it can be very strong, then it worths high cost. When you are trying to decreasing turns for Victoria and Lan, you will know the good of Berthier. And even if you think Berthier is too expensive, Golitzyn is the last slot general, then you should buy Sulkowsky, why buying Ney? If you don't have Berthier, at least you should use Sulkowsky and Scharnhorst. If you are buying Ney, you don't understand either Siege Master or Mobility. And what is it about Siege Master skill? There is actually a thread on the forum regarding this skill: european-war-4.boards.net/thread/48/work-progress-siege-master-skillAnd what excatly do chinese players specify about this particular skill? Siege Master in the Chinese opinion is the Bugle/Accurate/Strike lite version, deprives city's evasion. |
|
|
|
Post by Suvorov on Nov 15, 2015 20:11:49 GMT
|
|
