|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 28, 2019 20:48:22 GMT
Napoleon is simply the best,then John.
Mahmud sucks out the desert Alexander has the European skills needed,but starts off weak.
It is a matter of preference basically.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 28, 2019 20:51:56 GMT
Napoleon is simply the best,then John. Mahmud sucks out the desert Alexander has the European skills needed,but starts off weak. It is a matter of preference basically. Mahmud doesn’t suck outside of the desert. He is quite good anywhere. |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 28, 2019 21:26:57 GMT
Napoleon is simply the best,then John. Mahmud sucks out the desert Alexander has the European skills needed,but starts off weak. It is a matter of preference basically. Mahmud doesn’t suck outside of the desert. He is quite good anywhere. Yep,you maybe right😁 |
|
|
|
Post by silvercreek on Aug 29, 2019 15:18:10 GMT
Mahmud doesn’t suck outside of the desert. Yep, you maybe right. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 7, 2019 1:56:17 GMT
Napoleon is simply the best,then John. Mahmud sucks out the desert Alexander has the European skills needed,but starts off weak. It is a matter of preference basically. Mahmud doesn’t suck outside of the desert. He is quite good anywhere. Just like Rommel in WC4  . |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 7, 2019 3:14:39 GMT
Mahmud doesn’t suck outside of the desert. He is quite good anywhere. Just like Rommel in WC4 . Exactly. Except desert fighting is better in ew6 than in wc4 due to the ottoman empire being a frequent rival. |
|
notfinnish
Major
I was once the youngest person on on Earth!
Posts: 168
|
Post by notfinnish on Sept 8, 2019 16:45:04 GMT
I recently got the game and got the four free gens and then Scharnhorst, but I need a cavalry general but there's nothing like Scharnhorst except Dabrowski but he is quite expensive. What should I get.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 9, 2019 0:06:30 GMT
I recently got the game and got the four free gens and then Scharnhorst, but I need a cavalry general but there's nothing like Scharnhorst except Dabrowski but he is quite expensive. What should I get. I got murat as my first general. Gone did too. Basically grind out the netherlands for healing items for every single general you have, than beat the french campaign which will give you enough medals. If you are not a fan of farming, the shortcut is ney. But murat is very very strong. |
|
|
|
Post by Antonina of Philippopolis on Sept 20, 2019 3:21:15 GMT
Indeed. My experiment was Mahmud,bagration, Greene . That's all I remember . Haha it was a long roster) I wished for Phillip, Paget, scharny , And suchet. I dreamed about Louise and Kutuzov wishing for tactics and some cover. (I changed name to make space for a new stat) I had scharny. He had higher output than napoleon when the two were together! He is so easy to use, idk why anyone would buy kutuzov over scharny Actually I thought Kutuzov was the guy I was suppose to get. Juljas made him look beastly. Haha |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 20, 2019 11:01:38 GMT
I had scharny. He had higher output than napoleon when the two were together! He is so easy to use, idk why anyone would buy kutuzov over scharny Actually I thought Kutuzov was the guy I was suppose to get. Juljas made him look beastly. Haha I got him too. I thought he was trash personally. When I traded him for scharnhorst, there was a huge noticeable quality increase |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 20, 2019 20:16:37 GMT
Actually I thought Kutuzov was the guy I was suppose to get. Juljas made him look beastly. Haha I got him too. I thought he was trash personally. When I traded him for scharnhorst, there was a huge noticeable quality increase Kutuzov is like Patton. Might seem good at first, but actually has mediocre abilities that makes him inferior to some purple generals and Napoleon. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 20, 2019 21:58:49 GMT
I got him too. I thought he was trash personally. When I traded him for scharnhorst, there was a huge noticeable quality increase Kutuzov is like Patton. Might seem good at first, but actually has mediocre abilities that makes him inferior to some purple generals and Napoleon. Agreed. He has really good battle ability and most people see pf and salvo and buy him outright. There are many better choices. I actually think that the purple tier artillery gens are superior to the gold tiers. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 20, 2019 23:11:52 GMT
Kutuzov is like Patton. Might seem good at first, but actually has mediocre abilities that makes him inferior to some purple generals and Napoleon. Agreed. He has really good battle ability and most people see pf and salvo and buy him outright. There are many better choices. I actually think that the purple tier artillery gens are superior to the gold tiers. True. Only Napoleon is superior than Mahmud II. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 20, 2019 23:12:42 GMT
Do people think that high price means high quality? Because almost nobody seems to question Kutuzov's enormous price.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 21, 2019 10:39:11 GMT
Do people think that high price means high quality? Because almost nobody seems to question Kutuzov's enormous price. I don’t think price is as big of an issue in ew6. Remember, nelson, murat, and karl are super expensive. But if people have the slots for them, they don’t really think twice before purchasing. |
|
.
