|
|
Post by Luigi Sansonetti on Nov 8, 2024 3:52:10 GMT
Should I spend my 300k coins in unit tech or should I also just stockpile until update? Now you mentioned that, you should hold off on tech upgrades until challenge conquests (not in the upcoming update but will land eventually) are out, in case they make it 1914-like. Unfortunately, if they made the CC 1914-like, I have maxxed out attack in most of the unit types and I have slightly upgraded defense. My armies get shredded easily in Crimean War, and South American and Italian campaigns due to low HP and defense. |
|
|
|
Post by jonblend on Nov 9, 2024 22:52:18 GMT
Luigi Sansonetti , there is also the option of using 10 generals and some 30 medipacks for perfect clearing Crimean War. Though these resources are lost, buying generals and never using them again or selling them back also creates loss. Waiting for the next update is even better, since ET is already in the preview phase, it won't take long. Should I spend my 300k coins in unit tech or should I also just stockpile until update? My impression is that ET learned their lesson and refrained from using tech updates "against us" since EW6:1914. I rather see the danger of spending hard earned resources on something that you don't really need. |
|
|
|
Post by Luigi Sansonetti on Nov 14, 2024 14:03:39 GMT
So, John, Scharnhorst, Scott, Barclay, Suvorov, Davout and then Lan? John yes. Barclay yes. Scott no. For 4th artillery I like Scharnhorst but a very good player told me he thinks Maria is better. For 4th infantry I've heard good words for Suvorov and Robert. You don't need both Davout and Lan, maybe even neither. If you're thinking about Davout, I recommend taking a look at Paget as well. Get John and Barclay first. Get your hands on Crimea to form your own understanding. Ask yourself do you prefer PF or TM to decide between Suvorov/Robert and Scharnhorst/Maria. And then see if you need more generals. Why is Scharnhorst > Kutuzov? |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 14, 2024 17:57:11 GMT
John yes. Barclay yes. Scott no. For 4th artillery I like Scharnhorst but a very good player told me he thinks Maria is better. For 4th infantry I've heard good words for Suvorov and Robert. You don't need both Davout and Lan, maybe even neither. If you're thinking about Davout, I recommend taking a look at Paget as well. Get John and Barclay first. Get your hands on Crimea to form your own understanding. Ask yourself do you prefer PF or TM to decide between Suvorov/Robert and Scharnhorst/Maria. And then see if you need more generals. Why is Scharnhorst > Kutuzov? Scharnhorst does Kutuzov's job for a cheaper price, unless you find land fort useful. Plus I prefer inspiration over cover. |
|
|
|
Post by Luigi Sansonetti on Nov 15, 2024 10:02:44 GMT
So, John, Scharnhorst, Scott, Barclay, Suvorov, Davout and then Lan? John yes. Barclay yes. Scott no. For 4th artillery I like Scharnhorst but a very good player told me he thinks Maria is better. For 4th infantry I've heard good words for Suvorov and Robert. You don't need both Davout and Lan, maybe even neither. If you're thinking about Davout, I recommend taking a look at Paget as well. Get John and Barclay first. Get your hands on Crimea to form your own understanding. Ask yourself do you prefer PF or TM to decide between Suvorov/Robert and Scharnhorst/Maria. And then see if you need more generals. I think I rather get Suvorov. Robert lacks Assault. I hired Maria first. Maybe I consider hiring Scharnhorst after Suvorov. |
|
|
|
Post by Luigi Sansonetti on Nov 15, 2024 11:37:28 GMT
John yes. Barclay yes. Scott no. For 4th artillery I like Scharnhorst but a very good player told me he thinks Maria is better. For 4th infantry I've heard good words for Suvorov and Robert. You don't need both Davout and Lan, maybe even neither. If you're thinking about Davout, I recommend taking a look at Paget as well. Get John and Barclay first. Get your hands on Crimea to form your own understanding. Ask yourself do you prefer PF or TM to decide between Suvorov/Robert and Scharnhorst/Maria. And then see if you need more generals. I think I rather get Suvorov. Robert lacks Assault. I hired Maria first. Maybe I consider hiring Scharnhorst after Suvorov. Garibaldi has both Tactics Master, which Robert E. Lee has, but has higher damage than him. I guess the better question is Suvorov's Plain Fighting and King title, or Garibaldi's Tactic's Master and Tunnel? |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Nov 15, 2024 23:29:02 GMT
I think I rather get Suvorov. Robert lacks Assault. I hired Maria first. Maybe I consider hiring Scharnhorst after Suvorov. Garibaldi has both Tactics Master, which Robert E. Lee has, but has higher damage than him. I guess the better question is Suvorov's Plain Fighting and King title, or Garibaldi's Tactic's Master and Tunnel? You missed my point on this 4th infantry general. An important task for him is to command non-infantry units in some specific Crimean levels, which means versatility should be his main selling point. Although Garibaldi also has Tactic Master, Mountain Fighting is worse than Jungle Fighting since forests tiles are quite common in EW6. The best skills (not ranked because it's more of a preference thing) for hybrid generals are Plain Fighting, Jungle Fighting, Tactic Master, and Counterattack. Lee has 2 of them. Suvorov only has 1 but he has high BA and Inspiration (not the best but good). Washington with PF and Alert (also not the best but still good) plus an arriving BA-boosting unique item might also work. |
|
|
|
Post by zabadanov86 on Nov 16, 2024 10:13:28 GMT
|
|
