|
|
Post by SolidLight on May 30, 2020 13:48:50 GMT
I am at 1470 medals.I only have Clinton and Jourdan.Should I buy Massena or should I save up for Karl or Murat? Ambulance, then Murat immediately. Forget about Massena. Even Clinton can do his job in the early game as long as he has an ambulance. EDIT: whoops. I forgot that Clinton is so lame that he can’t even equip an item at the start. Well, Massena can’t either. You should probably upgrade Gates’ HP once so he can use an ambulance. You really shouldn’t invest more in infantry since even Massena can’t fight worth a darn without tons of investment at a point where medals are really precious. |
|
rokee
First Lieutenant
Likes playing strategy games.Still sucks at them.
Posts: 44
|
Post by rokee on Jun 7, 2020 3:54:24 GMT
After I get Ambulance,should I put it on Murat?
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jun 7, 2020 9:18:03 GMT
After I get Ambulance,should I put it on Murat? To start with, yeah probably. Usually you should put it on your most valuable general. |
|
rokee
First Lieutenant
Likes playing strategy games.Still sucks at them.
Posts: 44
|
Post by rokee on Jun 8, 2020 2:18:48 GMT
Thanks.Now should I upgrade Murat or should I get an infantry gen?
|
|
rokee
First Lieutenant
Likes playing strategy games.Still sucks at them.
Posts: 44
|
Post by rokee on Jun 20, 2020 3:59:20 GMT
I have nearly maxed my Murat.Now,should I get an infantry gen or Dabrowski to go along with Murat?
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jun 20, 2020 8:14:01 GMT
I have nearly maxed my Murat.Now,should I get an infantry gen or Dabrowski to go along with Murat? That’s up to you actually. I recommend having atleast one infantry general. Now infantry is complete garbage at combat, but they’re still handy siegers with grenadiers. In which case there’s two viable options: Massena, who has the highest siege damage (due to how aura works). And Bismarck, who sieges nearly as well as Massena while being significantly tougher and also more versatile (very important). However, Cavalry can actually siege nearly as well as grenadiers, if not better, since they have Victory rush and Cold Weapon, which is almost designed to siege since it deals 125% damage to the garrison and 75% damage to the city. Plus victory rush can trigger off of either killing the garrison or smashing the city. Since you have a nearly maxed Murat, you should probably have noticed that he has no problem dicing up cities. So if you REALLY feel like the lack of infantry is holding you back, get either Bismarck or Massena. Otherwise get Dabrowski. |
|
johnwick
Staff Sergeant
I'm thinking I'm back
Posts: 9
|
Post by johnwick on Jul 5, 2020 15:59:25 GMT
i have murat, karl, massena and mahmud and the frees. any recommendations on which cav gen i should get. dabrow lan or davout or somebody else
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jul 5, 2020 23:42:35 GMT
i have murat, karl, massena and mahmud and the frees. any recommendations on which cav gen i should get. dabrow lan or davout or somebody else I recommend drawsoloski (Polish Prince) he is a formidable calvery General. If you get him I don't believe you will need any more calvery Generals and I would try to get Artillery Generals like Sophia. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2020 23:58:45 GMT
I plan to buy a new infantry, but I don't know if I already buy Lannes or go to Karl soon, since I will have to sell one of the generals in the future to Crimean War.
|
|
johnwick
Staff Sergeant
I'm thinking I'm back
Posts: 9
|
Post by johnwick on Jul 6, 2020 3:30:26 GMT
is barclay better than washington when u have karl + massena
|
|
johnwick
Staff Sergeant
I'm thinking I'm back
Posts: 9
|
Post by johnwick on Jul 6, 2020 3:39:55 GMT
dabrowski only goes up to duke so his aura caps at like lv4 only 15dmg extra. Is it still worth over like a davout who can reach king... good def, tactical master and edge or a lan who can go emp edge and plain fight?
is alexander better than sophia? he has artilery master and goes to emp and with mahmud there is some chemistry? how about john i know hes a one trick with the terrains but at 50% doesnt seem too bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jul 6, 2020 5:58:48 GMT
dabrowski only goes up to duke so his aura caps at like lv4 only 15dmg extra. Is it still worth over like a davout who can reach king... good def, tactical master and edge or a lan who can go emp edge and plain fight? is alexander better than sophia? he has artilery master and goes to emp and with mahmud there is some chemistry? how about john i know hes a one trick with the terrains but at 50% doesnt seem too bad. Dabrowski has the third highest damage even if he’s a duke. Give him the aura medal. The 3 range isn’t nearly as important as any attack bonuses from the aura. He’s absolutely better than Davout and Lan. His biggest problem is his defense, but cavalry still has massive defense so he’ll last some rounds. Alex deals more damage than Sophia. Sophia has alert though, which means that she has a fair bit more survivability than him and that she’s a better backup admiral. However the fact that she has probably the 2nd best princess ability means that you should basically not consider her ever. Alex has that aura, which is powerful in its own right, but using him together with Mahmud is problematic. In conquest, that’s overkill for sieging. In campaign, that’s not as efficient for killing stuff as another cavalry general would be with your cavalry auras. John is about of par or slightly worse than Alex imo. I don’t like either generals’ terrain skills, but John has higher potential damage while Alex has more consistency. |
|
johnwick
Staff Sergeant
I'm thinking I'm back
Posts: 9
|
Post by johnwick on Jul 6, 2020 7:22:04 GMT
dabrowski only goes up to duke so his aura caps at like lv4 only 15dmg extra. Is it still worth over like a davout who can reach king... good def, tactical master and edge or a lan who can go emp edge and plain fight? is alexander better than sophia? he has artilery master and goes to emp and with mahmud there is some chemistry? how about john i know hes a one trick with the terrains but at 50% doesnt seem too bad. Dabrowski has the third highest damage even if he’s a duke. Give him the aura medal. The 3 range isn’t nearly as important as any attack bonuses from the aura. He’s absolutely better than Davout and Lan. His biggest problem is his defense, but cavalry still has massive defense so he’ll last some rounds. Alex deals more damage than Sophia. Sophia has alert though, which means that she has a fair bit more survivability than him and that she’s a better backup admiral. However the fact that she has probably the 2nd best princess ability means that you should basically not consider her ever. Alex has that aura, which is powerful in its own right, but using him together with Mahmud is problematic. In conquest, that’s overkill for sieging. In campaign, that’s not as efficient for killing stuff as another cavalry general would be with your cavalry auras. John is about of par or slightly worse than Alex imo. I don’t like either generals’ terrain skills, but John has higher potential damage while Alex has more consistency. with dabrowski ill just a prussian helmet. When it comes to artillery is there anyone better than alexander (like a scharn or john) when u have mahmud as well or is aura just broken? also is barclay better than washington when you have massena and karl |
|
|
|
Post by SolidLight on Jul 6, 2020 8:27:43 GMT
Dabrowski has the third highest damage even if he’s a duke. Give him the aura medal. The 3 range isn’t nearly as important as any attack bonuses from the aura. He’s absolutely better than Davout and Lan. His biggest problem is his defense, but cavalry still has massive defense so he’ll last some rounds. Alex deals more damage than Sophia. Sophia has alert though, which means that she has a fair bit more survivability than him and that she’s a better backup admiral. However the fact that she has probably the 2nd best princess ability means that you should basically not consider her ever. Alex has that aura, which is powerful in its own right, but using him together with Mahmud is problematic. In conquest, that’s overkill for sieging. In campaign, that’s not as efficient for killing stuff as another cavalry general would be with your cavalry auras. John is about of par or slightly worse than Alex imo. I don’t like either generals’ terrain skills, but John has higher potential damage while Alex has more consistency. with dabrowski ill just a prussian helmet. When it comes to artillery is there anyone better than alexander (like a scharn or john) when u have mahmud as well or is aura just broken? also is barclay better than washington when you have massena and karl I use Scharnhorst. Though looking at the math alex seem almost identical. Maybe Scharnhorst is a little stronger since artillery isn’t going to kill stuff for morale. So inspiration might push him above. Barclay is going to boost Massena and Karl so that trio is stronger than Massena, Karl, Washington. Though Washington has better survivability which matters a lot for infantry. That said, that trio still sucks because no one has victory rush, good mobility or good enough durability. |
|
johnwick
Staff Sergeant
I'm thinking I'm back
Posts: 9
|
Post by johnwick on Jul 6, 2020 8:39:24 GMT
I use Scharnhorst. Though looking at the math alex seem almost identical. Maybe Scharnhorst is a little stronger since artillery isn’t going to kill stuff for morale. So inspiration might push him above. Barclay is going to boost Massena and Karl so that trio is stronger than Massena, Karl, Washington. Though Washington has better survivability which matters a lot for infantry. That said, that trio still sucks because no one has victory rush, good mobility or good enough durability. so the best combination with mahmud is scharn? even with the aura from alexander is it still not worth getting him and getting scharn? does that make scharn the 3 strongest arty after napolean and mahmud? also not worth going a 3rd inf gen? and not a 3-2-2-1? btw thanks for replying man i am getting dabrowski and also should i go 3-2-2-1 or nah? |
|
