|
|
Post by CountVonNumenor on Aug 29, 2018 13:55:09 GMT
Alright
|
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Aug 30, 2018 10:39:45 GMT
Infantry: Wellesley, Clinton, Prevost, Ariel Cavarly: Blucher, Golitsyn, Durova (cuz she bad) Artillery: Napoleon, Fatimah, Ludwig Navy: Verhuel, Duckworth Nah. Infantry: Massena Karl Barclay Washington Cavalry: Blucher Murat Davout Dabrowski Artillery: Sophia, Maria, Napoleon, Kutuzov Navy: Victoria, Nelson, Jervis, Treville. big r/wooosh |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 2, 2018 2:49:34 GMT
Nah. Infantry: Massena Karl Barclay Washington Cavalry: Blucher Murat Davout Dabrowski Artillery: Sophia, Maria, Napoleon, Kutuzov Navy: Victoria, Nelson, Jervis, Treville. big r/wooosh Why? |
|
|
|
Post by Robert Walpole on Sept 2, 2018 4:03:18 GMT
it was meant to be a joke... |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 2, 2018 4:14:39 GMT
it was meant to be a joke... thx for telling me. |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 2, 2018 23:41:27 GMT
Prévost, Clinton, Golitsyn, Merveldt, Tormasov, Belsford, Verhuell, Duckworth.
HOW CAN PEOPLE DEFEAT ME?! BEST LINEUP EVER!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 3, 2018 2:12:18 GMT
Prévost, Clinton, Golitsyn, Merveldt, Tormasov, Belsford, Verhuell, Duckworth. HOW CAN PEOPLE DEFEAT ME?! BEST LINEUP EVER!!! What about Ludwig. Didn’t he get an invitation? |
|
|
|
Post by Erich von Manstein on Sept 3, 2018 2:28:24 GMT
Prévost, Clinton, Golitsyn, Merveldt, Tormasov, Belsford, Verhuell, Duckworth. HOW CAN PEOPLE DEFEAT ME?! BEST LINEUP EVER!!! What about Ludwig. Didn’t he get an invitation? At Ludwig is better than some of the blues(to be specific, Belsford and Yermolov). |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 18, 2018 4:11:23 GMT
What about Ludwig. Didn’t he get an invitation? At Ludwig is better than some of the blues(to be specific, Belsford and Yermolov). Invite yermolov and sulkowski. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 18, 2018 18:19:21 GMT
At Ludwig is better than some of the blues(to be specific, Belsford and Yermolov). Invite yermolov and sulkowski. Actually ludwig is better than all the blues imo, except for Alex I and Napoleon III |
|
|
|
Post by Reinhard Von Lohengramm on Sept 18, 2018 18:44:18 GMT
I think Dabrowski is better than Lan, dabrowski only can reach duke, but he have aura buff an he can buff murat and Lan dont this advantage.
Dabrowski and Murat have 40+ damage, a normal cavalry unit can deal 90-100 of damage.
I think and i change my opinion of davout. Tactics master and riding master are good but the probability is low, 20% and 10%.
Murat and Dabrowski almost of the time have high damage in one strike, thanks to surprise attack murat can deal 140 of damage and dabrowski can deal 120 of damage against blucher in heavy cavalry (1812 conquest).
And my davout can only deal 80 of damage againts blucher and the twice attack dont works really well against powerful enemys because davout is dead (one strike of blucher counterattack deal around 120-140 to murat, dabrowski and davout fully upgrade, in case of davout attack double, he receive 280-240 of damage in one turn and he is very injured)
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 18, 2018 22:43:07 GMT
Invite yermolov and sulkowski. Actually ludwig is better than all the blues imo, except for Alex I and Napoleon III Tbh napoleon III has no purpose. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 19, 2018 2:23:41 GMT
Actually ludwig is better than all the blues imo, except for Alex I and Napoleon III Tbh napoleon III has no purpose. Agreed. He is ok, but if you have Napoleon, you will get Mahmud and Alexander. If you don’t. You will get Mahmud Alexander and or Sophia. He just doesn’t fit into the big leagues, and he is quite expensive. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Sept 19, 2018 3:35:47 GMT
Tbh napoleon III has no purpose. Agreed. He is ok, but if you have Napoleon, you will get Mahmud and Alexander. If you don’t. You will get Mahmud Alexander and or Sophia. He just doesn’t fit into the big leagues, and he is quite expensive. Agreed. He wastes a skill on land fort. |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Sept 19, 2018 14:32:06 GMT
Agreed. He is ok, but if you have Napoleon, you will get Mahmud and Alexander. If you don’t. You will get Mahmud Alexander and or Sophia. He just doesn’t fit into the big leagues, and he is quite expensive. Agreed. He wastes a skill on land fort. I agree. It can be good on occasion, but i’d take alexander over napoleon iii any day of the week. The main difference between Mahmud and Napoleon III is that mahmud’s other skills make up for it, whereas napoleon’s don’t. Just think of him as a ludwig outside of the city. |
|
