|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2019 14:12:49 GMT
Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus,shield wall triggers pretty frequently, as long as you have the skill Lvl of course. Besides, infantry with damage is great, but replacing tunnel with shield wall is makes Crompey hard to kill.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2019 14:19:36 GMT
Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus,shield wall triggers pretty frequently, as long as you have the skill Lvl of course. Besides, infantry with damage is great, but replacing tunnel with shield wall is makes Crompey hard to kill. Maybe. Plain fighting may be more expensive, but it is 80% of counterattack and works when attacking and defending. Shield wall is worth considering, but the fact that I had spartacus with it at lvl 5 and it did not trigger consistently is not very convincing. Pf and counterattack together do sound great though |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2019 14:25:49 GMT
Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus ,shield wall triggers pretty frequently, as long as you have the skill Lvl of course. Besides, infantry with damage is great, but replacing tunnel with shield wall is makes Crompey hard to kill. Maybe. Plain fighting may be more expensive, but it is 80% of counterattack and works when attacking and defending. Shield wall is worth considering, but the fact that I had spartacus with it at lvl 5 and it did not trigger consistently is not very convincing. Pf and counterattack together do sound great though Shield wall + hide + infantry commander + siege. Where's your God now? Trading offense for an all around build. Shield wall procs consistently for Pompey, and he has a Lvl 4 one. It's a 1/5 chance, and attacking more means it procs more. Hide for the anti archer, infantry commander for double attacks, and siege for just city destruction. I mean, with infantry commander + shield wall, you'll be hitting the enemy for 200+damage while taking less than 50 if shield wall procs |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Aug 17, 2019 14:41:45 GMT
Maybe. Plain fighting may be more expensive, but it is 80% of counterattack and works when attacking and defending. Shield wall is worth considering, but the fact that I had spartacus with it at lvl 5 and it did not trigger consistently is not very convincing. Pf and counterattack together do sound great though Shield wall + hide + infantry commander + siege. Where's your God now? Trading offense for an all around build. Shield wall procs consistently for Pompey, and he has a Lvl 4 one. It's a 1/5 chance, and attacking more means it procs more. Hide for the anti archer, infantry commander for double attacks, and siege for just city destruction. I mean, with infantry commander + shield wall, you'll be hitting the enemy for 200+damage while taking less than 50 if shield wall procs Maybe this will the new Sulla general ! An all around general , invincible and painful, like the original dictator and his proscription lists |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2019 15:26:38 GMT
Maybe. Plain fighting may be more expensive, but it is 80% of counterattack and works when attacking and defending. Shield wall is worth considering, but the fact that I had spartacus with it at lvl 5 and it did not trigger consistently is not very convincing. Pf and counterattack together do sound great though Shield wall + hide + infantry commander + siege. Where's your God now? Trading offense for an all around build. Shield wall procs consistently for Pompey, and he has a Lvl 4 one. It's a 1/5 chance, and attacking more means it procs more. Hide for the anti archer, infantry commander for double attacks, and siege for just city destruction. I mean, with infantry commander + shield wall, you'll be hitting the enemy for 200+damage while taking less than 50 if shield wall procs What about this build? Inf Commander + Intercept + Hide + Roar, aka the god of killing archers. Although I do like the terrain bonuses. The general you described is quite decent., |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2019 15:27:17 GMT
I mean I do like hide, but i would not sacrifice it over a terrain bonus. Or march/siege tho
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2019 18:13:49 GMT
I mean I do like hide, but i would not sacrifice it over a terrain bonus. Or march/siege tho Never saw infantry gens as the offensive type. I see them as more supportive units who are good at all, but not exceptional at anything. That's why I'm willing to trade 20 damage for 20 less damage taken. |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Aug 17, 2019 18:21:48 GMT
I mean I do like hide, but i would not sacrifice it over a terrain bonus. Or march/siege tho Never saw infantry gens as the offensive type. I see them as more supportive units who are good at all, but not exceptional at anything. That's why I'm willing to trade 20 damage for 20 less damage taken. My free commander has 200 of attack on 3 legionaries. |
|
|
|
Post by AlterFritz on Aug 17, 2019 18:40:10 GMT
Never saw infantry gens as the offensive type. I see them as more supportive units who are good at all, but not exceptional at anything. That's why I'm willing to trade 20 damage for 20 less damage taken. My free commander has 200 of attack on 3 legionaries. Not that wow.. my Bato has 199 on 4 Heavy Infantry and he is just silver tier |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Aug 17, 2019 19:04:00 GMT
My free commander has 200 of attack on 3 legionaries. Not that wow.. my Bato has 199 on 4 Heavy Infantry and he is just silver tier His name is "Beat-Ooohhhh" !!! Btw there is not a big difference between them , just +5 of attack and +15% of flat damage . |
|
|
|
Post by kingbutawl on Aug 17, 2019 19:05:32 GMT
Not that wow.. my Bato has 199 on 4 Heavy Infantry and he is just silver tier His name is "Beat-Ooohhhh" !!! Btw there is not a big difference between them , just +5 of attack and +15% of flat damage. Moreover His rank is only chiliarch . |
|
|
|
Post by AlterFritz on Aug 17, 2019 19:32:46 GMT
Moreover His rank is only chiliarch . Not mine. |
|
|
|
Post by AlterFritz on Aug 17, 2019 19:42:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by AlterFritz on Aug 17, 2019 20:00:03 GMT
I decided at last that he got jf instead of advantage.
But I'm unsure about the item he should get, more hp is okay but he is mostly sitting on bowmen and can replenish every second city.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2019 20:52:57 GMT
I mean I do like hide, but i would not sacrifice it over a terrain bonus. Or march/siege tho Never saw infantry gens as the offensive type. I see them as more supportive units who are good at all, but not exceptional at anything. That's why I'm willing to trade 20 damage for 20 less damage taken. I’d rather have them crit so hard they don’t take retaliation. Especially needed in killing archers. I usually send spartacus after generals like caesar or octavian, and he almost one shots them in a single turn. |
|
