|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Apr 26, 2020 17:51:31 GMT
I just looked better at your screenshots and noticed later your increase in resources! (And you are economic good!) - so until now we are not sure - I will use your findings! So just the reload was not giving directly 50 years more? Your better economy made the change? I believe so ... there are many factors, but your this theory can be right. This is the 4/5/.../x time when I start the game. In my last playthrough, I got Sakurako after advancing in campaign ( from the same old same that brought me Isabella ). But again, it might have been the higher rank . Anyway, I'm certain it affects the years of rule ... Thank you a lot for your collaboration. One word in front. My intension is: You have to be successful in your set up and winning the conquest I personally don't like to be frustrated for missing side by requirements that I don't know now - if this is spoiling the game please give me a warning! Now the important part: - End game (420- maxed) I always get 500/550 years in Asia for HRE R38 (4275🔧 = 500ya, 4277🔧 = 550ya) only without resources (9💰 5🔧 49🍖) I get 450 yesrs - so until further information I say: Resources and campaign stars influence the years ruled in Asia. |
|
|
|
Post by Hannibal Barca on Apr 26, 2020 18:33:57 GMT
I believe so ... there are many factors, but your this theory can be right. This is the 4/5/.../x time when I start the game. In my last playthrough, I got Sakurako after advancing in campaign ( from the same old same that brought me Isabella ). But again, it might have been the higher rank . Anyway, I'm certain it affects the years of rule ... Thank you a lot for your collaboration. One word in front. My intension is: You have to be successful in your set up and winning the conquest I personally don't like to be frustrated for missing side by requirements that I don't know now - if this is spoiling the game please give me a warning! Now the important part: - End game (420- maxed) I always get 500/550 years in Asia for HRE R38 (4275🔧 = 500ya, 4277🔧 = 550ya) only without resources (9💰 5🔧 49🍖) I get 450 yesrs - so until further information I say: Resources and campaign stars influence the years ruled in Asia. I'll try to see if I can finish another HRE conquest . 4277 🔧 is easy to get in 38 turns. This way we could compare the years of rule, but first could you tell us your rank and nobility ? I'm afraid these 2 are still the main factor . |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 26, 2020 18:37:46 GMT
Thank you a lot for your collaboration. One word in front. My intension is: You have to be successful in your set up and winning the conquest I personally don't like to be frustrated for missing side by requirements that I don't know now - if this is spoiling the game please give me a warning! Now the important part: - End game (420- maxed) I always get 500/550 years in Asia for HRE R38 (4275🔧 = 500ya, 4277🔧 = 550ya) only without resources (9💰 5🔧 49🍖) I get 450 yesrs - so until further information I say: Resources and campaign stars influence the years ruled in Asia. I'll try to see if I can finish another HRE conquest . 4277 🔧 is easy to get in 38 turns. This way we could compare the years of rule, but first could you tell us your rank and nobility ? I'm afraid these 2 are still the main factor . Make the holy Romen emperor proud! Deus Vult! |
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Apr 26, 2020 19:03:41 GMT
Thank you a lot for your collaboration. One word in front. My intension is: You have to be successful in your set up and winning the conquest I personally don't like to be frustrated for missing side by requirements that I don't know now - if this is spoiling the game please give me a warning! Now the important part: - End game (420- maxed) I always get 500/550 years in Asia for HRE R38 (4275🔧 = 500ya, 4277🔧 = 550ya) only without resources (9💰 5🔧 49🍖) I get 450 yesrs - so until further information I say: Resources and campaign stars influence the years ruled in Asia. I'll try to see if I can finish another HRE conquest . 4277 🔧 is easy to get in 38 turns. This way we could compare the years of rule, but first could you tell us your rank and nobility ? I'm afraid these 2 are still the main factor . I believe I am maxed with 7 slots: My score, this is the max I can get, is: 56-367500 ,64-277480 |
|
|
|
Post by Marshal Forwards on Apr 26, 2020 20:19:21 GMT
I'll try to see if I can finish another HRE conquest . 4277 🔧 is easy to get in 38 turns. This way we could compare the years of rule, but first could you tell us your rank and nobility ? I'm afraid these 2 are still the main factor . I believe I am maxed with 7 slots: My score, this is the max I can get, is: 56-367500 ,64-277480 Correct. With my 8 maxed gens it’s rank 57-420.030 and nobility 65-317.120 420.030/8 x 7 = 367.500 317.120/8 x 7 = 277.480 |
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Apr 26, 2020 20:31:33 GMT
For this reason I don't believe for now not in dependencies to rank/nob as EW4 is Not p2win and rank/nob depends on the number of slots - thank you for your confirmation Marshal Forwards ! We are way OT - I will start a new thread Asian years discussion |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Apr 26, 2020 20:35:46 GMT
That sounds fun, and what Happened to your Android?
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 27, 2020 18:42:34 GMT
Actually I kind of understand why some people may be turned off by davout. His output is a bit inconsistent. Long term wise, his quality slightly degregates. But as a starting general, I don’t think you could ask for anybody better
|
|
|
|
Post by 𝘛𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘴𝘬𝘺 on Apr 28, 2020 14:46:43 GMT
Actually I kind of understand why some people may be turned off by davout. His output is a bit inconsistent. Long term wise, his quality slightly degregates. But as a starting general, I don’t think you could ask for anybody better I admit that (before I got here more insights - thanks!) I've overseen his real quality - special as a starting general! His paste will make a big difference for beginning! Now I see his quality much better. |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Apr 28, 2020 22:11:31 GMT
Actually I kind of understand why some people may be turned off by davout. His output is a bit inconsistent. Long term wise, his quality slightly degregates. But as a starting general, I don’t think you could ask for anybody better If you buy the game and buy him to start off he's an absolute monster. But if you grind for generals (as a free to play player), and eventually end up with the likes of Sulkow, Scharny, Ushakov, Sophia, Isabela, etc you don't really need him. Much like whether or not Sakurako is useful, it depends on your generals |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Apr 28, 2020 22:26:51 GMT
The other one I am unsure of is Yermolov. Yermolov imo is significantly worse than scharnhorst as in trying to be an infantry hybrid, Yermolov loses an entire hex of movement due to his lack of engineering. While this is fixable with items, this would either require two oak wheels or a horse artillery to fix. Which is very expensive. On infantry, he is not exactly spectacular either. Imo, he is very meh on infantry. Plus bugle >>> formation, so you will rarely use him on infantry. As Sophia is obtainable very early on, 3 artillery generals is not needed. The fact you can get 2 princess artillery doesn’t lower Scharnhorst‘s value for a beginner, or does it? Yermolov is IMO the second best choice after Scharni when one gets tired of waiting for him in the academy. The refresh system is the one annoying flaw in EW4 ET seems to put in every game. So for me Yermolov is one rank below Scharnhorst, but still a good first artillery/trainer. Not at all. The fact that he's the best tier 2 artillery gen and a trainer makes him great for when you get Isabela, as you can regroup Scharny and have Isabela start off with 4* arty and a decent level (as opposed to 3* arty and a very low level) That's assuming Sophia is unlocked (which is pretty easy) As for Yermolov, he is also an infantry gen, so can function on either infantry or artillery until you get a better infantry gen and a better artillery gen. In short, Yermolov's abilities make him the second best tier 2 artillery gen, but you're still better off going for Scharny first (especially since infantry gens aren't that useful in the grand scheme of things) |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 29, 2020 2:12:31 GMT
The fact you can get 2 princess artillery doesn’t lower Scharnhorst‘s value for a beginner, or does it? Yermolov is IMO the second best choice after Scharni when one gets tired of waiting for him in the academy. The refresh system is the one annoying flaw in EW4 ET seems to put in every game. So for me Yermolov is one rank below Scharnhorst, but still a good first artillery/trainer. Not at all. The fact that he's the best tier 2 artillery gen and a trainer makes him great for when you get Isabela, as you can regroup Scharny and have Isabela start off with 4* arty and a decent level (as opposed to 3* arty and a very low level) That's assuming Sophia is unlocked (which is pretty easy) As for Yermolov, he is also an infantry gen, so can function on either infantry or artillery until you get a better infantry gen and a better artillery gen. In short, Yermolov's abilities make him the second best tier 2 artillery gen, but you're still better off going for Scharny first (especially since infantry gens aren't that useful in the grand scheme of things) I gave him a meh review because he is a pretty terrible infantry general. Formation + bad movement + 0 training stars + 3 stars infantry is a bad combination. He is like Maria but worse. On artillery, he is decent. But as Scharny only needs an oak wheel and has 3 training stars, he is just miles better. Plus when we bring Kutaisov (and Sophia and Isabella), Yermolov just doesn’t cut it. He is far better than jourdan but far worse than Scharny |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on Apr 29, 2020 2:24:39 GMT
Not at all. The fact that he's the best tier 2 artillery gen and a trainer makes him great for when you get Isabela, as you can regroup Scharny and have Isabela start off with 4* arty and a decent level (as opposed to 3* arty and a very low level) That's assuming Sophia is unlocked (which is pretty easy) As for Yermolov, he is also an infantry gen, so can function on either infantry or artillery until you get a better infantry gen and a better artillery gen. In short, Yermolov's abilities make him the second best tier 2 artillery gen, but you're still better off going for Scharny first (especially since infantry gens aren't that useful in the grand scheme of things) I gave him a meh review because he is a pretty terrible infantry general. Formation + bad movement + 0 training stars + 3 stars infantry is a bad combination. He is like Maria but worse. On artillery, he is decent. But as Scharny only needs an oak wheel and has 3 training stars, he is just miles better. Plus when we bring Kutaisov (and Sophia and Isabella), Yermolov just doesn’t cut it. He is far better than jourdan but far worse than Scharny I agree with the review. And tier 2 is rather lacking in good artillery gens. It basically Scharny, Ushakov, and maybe Collingwood, and thats about it. Heck even Grouchy looks good when you factor in the fact that Drouot and Mortier are both in tier 2 (and Mortier is unforgivably expensive) |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Apr 29, 2020 2:40:10 GMT
I gave him a meh review because he is a pretty terrible infantry general. Formation + bad movement + 0 training stars + 3 stars infantry is a bad combination. He is like Maria but worse. On artillery, he is decent. But as Scharny only needs an oak wheel and has 3 training stars, he is just miles better. Plus when we bring Kutaisov (and Sophia and Isabella), Yermolov just doesn’t cut it. He is far better than jourdan but far worse than Scharny I agree with the review. And tier 2 is rather lacking in good artillery gens. It basically Scharny, Ushakov, and maybe Collingwood, and thats about it. Heck even Grouchy looks good when you factor in the fact that Drouot and Mortier are both in tier 2 (and Mortier is unforgivably expensive) Yep. Duckwood and Hood are slightly better than wood, as siege works on artillery whereas ballistics is useless. But they are very slow on navy. Luckily we get 2 artillery princesses so we aren’t lacking in artillery generals. Plus the first tier actually has more good artillery generals than the second tier. |
|
|
|
Post by Arya Stark on May 1, 2020 2:19:29 GMT
So beat coalition campaign then essentially move on to the hre campaign. With the hre campaign items like the flintlock, second snair drum, and ... obtaining the other princesses won’t be too bad. Especially considering people have gotten isabella with no generals and HRE campaigns such as Reconstruction of Empire are great for medal and reset farming |
|
