|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Apr 10, 2016 4:10:27 GMT
The reason for my idea was so other people can check other nations easily. My idea was suposed to be useful for the ordinary player as well as the GM
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 10, 2016 13:16:18 GMT
Sounds like CivRP or something  One thing I noticed in TWs, the more complicated the details are... the more difficult it will be for the players and the GM to keep track of. Why do you think this game GW (or call it CivRP) do need so much more details than TWs? What do you hope to accomplish with this? And which portions does helps with the goal? And which portuons doesn't help you achieve your goal? Not trying to be negative but I want to help you form a more solid design by thinking of hard questions and second guessing to give a better answer. Oops, I never noticed this post. The reason why it has so many details is because 1. I want to test everyones limits. 2. Theres a test you need to pass to play, so it should be knowledgeable people only. 3. If we do what Xakire suggested it should be easy. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 10, 2016 14:44:55 GMT
im a bit confused, what is this? the more I'm going in the culture thread the more I'm being confused.... |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 10, 2016 14:47:17 GMT
1. I want to test everyones limits
Mine will come before the war comes, can't we simplify a few things, especially the technology when it will come?
NOT BEING NEGATIVE...
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 10, 2016 15:00:15 GMT
1. I want to test everyones limits Mine will come before the war comes, can't we simplify a few things, especially the technology when it will come? NOT BEING NEGATIVE... Germans are a complicated people. Its a lot more simple than you think. Its pretty much a really long but watered down TW. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 10, 2016 15:05:26 GMT
1. I want to test everyones limits Mine will come before the war comes, can't we simplify a few things, especially the technology when it will come? NOT BEING NEGATIVE... Germans are a complicated people. Its a lot more simple than you think. Its pretty much a really long but watered down TW. I know, German language too is complicated for a non German like me  |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 10, 2016 15:07:47 GMT
Germans are a complicated people. Its a lot more simple than you think. Its pretty much a really long but watered down TW. I know, German language too is complicated for a non German like me Rindfleischrkeitterungwachundshaufgabentregunsegesetz (probably spelt wrong) is long 60 letters long and means law of beef label regulation. Or something like that. What wqs your first language? English is a Germanic language. Fun fact. |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 10, 2016 15:11:15 GMT
I know, German language too is complicated for a non German like me Rindfleischrkeitterungwachundshaufgabentregunsegesetz (probably spelt wrong) is long 60 letters long and means law of beef label regulation. Or something like that. What wqs your first language? English is a Germanic language. Fun fact. myyyy first language is Urdu, then Englisch, then Deutsch that I can't Sprach since im learning. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 10, 2016 15:13:49 GMT
Rindfleischrkeitterungwachundshaufgabentregunsegesetz (probably spelt wrong) is long 60 letters long and means law of beef label regulation. Or something like that. What wqs your first language? English is a Germanic language. Fun fact. myyyy first language is Urdu, then Englisch, then Deutsch that I can't Sprach since im learning. Trilingualism? Thats hard man. It took me 3 years to learn english. Though I started at a young age like most people here. Prooobably should have learnt french sjnce Im in Hessen and in a more middle class era buuuut |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Apr 10, 2016 15:15:02 GMT
myyyy first language is Urdu, then Englisch, then Deutsch that I can't Sprach since im learning. Trilingualism? Thats hard man. It took me 3 years to learn english. Though I started at a young age like most people here. Prooobably should have learnt french sjnce Im in Hessen and in a more middle class era buuuut Englisch is universal man! None can beat it! See its helping you here |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 10, 2016 15:16:18 GMT
Trilingualism? Thats hard man. It took me 3 years to learn english. Though I started at a young age like most people here. Prooobably should have learnt french sjnce Im in Hessen and in a more middle class era buuuut Englisch is universal man! None can beat it! See its helping you here That is true. Most of the internet is 1. English 2. Chinese 3. German. |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 11, 2016 5:56:38 GMT
Sounds like CivRP or something One thing I noticed in TWs, the more complicated the details are... the more difficult it will be for the players and the GM to keep track of. Why do you think this game GW (or call it CivRP) do need so much more details than TWs? What do you hope to accomplish with this? And which portions does helps with the goal? And which portuons doesn't help you achieve your goal? Not trying to be negative but I want to help you form a more solid design by thinking of hard questions and second guessing to give a better answer. Oops, I never noticed this post. The reason why it has so many details is because 1. I want to test everyones limits. 2. Theres a test you need to pass to play, so it should be knowledgeable people only. 3. If we do what Xakire suggested it should be easy. Okay, just keep in mind that details are in general salt-prone, why? Because when there is a detail, people may find different ways to apply that detail in their turns. Conflicting applications creates salt in the midst of ambiguous rules. Likewise, a detail is an opportunity to miss something someone did, thus disagreement, thus salt may or may not happen. Or in short - Probability is the measure of the likelihood that an event will occur. I would say that each feature has its own individual probability of salt-creation. So, more details equals higher combined probability of salt-creation. Not all feature in a TW or GW are made equal. I will give you that. The salt-prone probability of a feature varies, make a note of that. |
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 11, 2016 16:22:50 GMT
Oops, I never noticed this post. The reason why it has so many details is because 1. I want to test everyones limits. 2. Theres a test you need to pass to play, so it should be knowledgeable people only. 3. If we do what Xakire suggested it should be easy. Okay, just keep in mind that details are in general salt-prone, why? Because when there is a detail, people may find different ways to apply that detail in their turns. Conflicting applications creates salt in the midst of ambiguous rules. Likewise, a detail is an opportunity to miss something someone did, thus disagreement, thus salt may or may not happen. Or in short - Probability is the measure of the likelihood that an event will occur. I would say that each feature has its own individual probability of salt-creation. So, more details equals higher combined probability of salt-creation. Not all feature in a TW or GW are made equal. I will give you that. The salt-prone probability of a feature varies, make a note of that. I guess we'll see when the time comes. |
|
|
|
Post by Desophaeus on Apr 11, 2016 16:59:48 GMT
Or at least if you push the piles of details so high on each players, they would be so insanely busy with their own details and they couldn't afford to explode in salt about someone else's moves. I lol'ed at that thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bismarck on Apr 12, 2016 1:07:19 GMT
Ok guys, Im going to revamp the rule book with all of the changes Władysław Anders and I have made. |
|
