|
|
Napoleon
Jan 8, 2017 1:04:35 GMT
via mobile
Post by Polish ulan on Jan 8, 2017 1:04:35 GMT
For me - in fact he shoud be god in game with his name in title.
It would be also interesting challange to beat him in Coalition Campaign.
In this thread some people were saying that 5 stars in Art it's not enough for Naoleon, I'll just give another hipotetic and imo close to history answer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Polish ulan on Jan 8, 2017 1:09:29 GMT
And - it was picking last 6th ability between Banner, Spy, Siege Master, not to sum up  |
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Jan 8, 2017 18:20:26 GMT
I will restate my opinion.
Napoleon should be best Artillery, which quite possibly will make him the best general, unless you like cavalry more. However, while he should be able to hold his own in Cavalry and Infantry, he should not be the best general in anything but Artillery. For one thing, that would invalidate all other generals who are best in their field. They would simply be 2nd best at that point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jan 8, 2017 18:31:49 GMT
Do you guys mean something like this Napoleon?  |
|
|
|
Post by junius on Jan 8, 2017 18:36:22 GMT
Do you guys mean something like this Napoleon? Oh my Napoleon, where did you find that? |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jan 8, 2017 18:38:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Imperial RomeBall on Jan 9, 2017 0:36:13 GMT
Lol, very funny Jean-Luc Picard, That Will do, sir, That will do. (Assault is a bit flashy, but I think it fits him) |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jan 9, 2017 0:42:59 GMT
Lol, very funny Jean-Luc Picard, That Will do, sir, That will do. (Assault is a bit flashy, but I think it fits him) Blitzed all of Europe as fast as he did, and without tanks. I find it fitting. Also, this helps with visualization, eh? |
|
|
|
Post by Mountbatten on Jan 9, 2017 4:03:15 GMT
I dont think he should be the best as there was other commanders with better records than him, but he should still be quite a few steps up than the weak version that ET made him
|
|
|
|
Post by huykhoi2000 on Jan 9, 2017 6:19:18 GMT
I dont think he should be the best as there was other commanders with better records than him, but he should still be quite a few steps up than the weak version that ET made him Well, if records are about H2H between commanders, then they shouldn't consider who is the best. As majority never says Scipio Africanus was better than Hannibal Barca. |
|
|
|
Napoleon
Jan 12, 2017 12:03:12 GMT
via mobile
Post by junius on Jan 12, 2017 12:03:12 GMT
Have you tried a multiple trainer? Like someone with cav and move, or art×2? Seems interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Luc Picard on Jan 12, 2017 14:32:34 GMT
Have you tried a multiple trainer? Like someone with cav and move, or art×2? Seems interesting. Yes. It can be done |
|
|
|
Post by Napoleon Bonaparte on Jan 12, 2017 16:01:44 GMT
Yeah, I do need a decent upgrade. Easytech, you can't do anything.
|
|
|
|
Napoleon
Jan 31, 2017 12:53:40 GMT
via mobile
Post by Robert Walpole on Jan 31, 2017 12:53:40 GMT
Napoleon is a weak hybrid general. I agree with the assault Defence art agreement but if that happens then wouldn't be the game broken with every single player having Napoleon in the game? I suggest getting Napoleon when you finished the following:
Imperial Eagle 5 star all
Completing all conquests as France
1000 years Europe America Asia
That way you will receive a Buffed out Napoleon. Max Health, A-D Art and Max Nobility
|
|
|
|
Napoleon
Jan 27, 2022 11:35:00 GMT
via mobile
Post by Lancetier on Jan 27, 2022 11:35:00 GMT
Do you think he should be the strongest general. Name some generals that were better than him. Suvorov was the best general who ever existed... period... next in game would be massena and mureau. Napoleon himself stated something along the lines that mureau was better than him as long as he commanded less than 20k troops. Clauswitz said that suvorov could have easily defeated Napoleon in an evenly matched battle, and clauswitz is a celebrated and good military historian and analyst (he wrote the "on war" item in game |
|
