|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Apr 28, 2020 10:32:46 GMT
Speaking about the Civil War historical missions, is max tech required? near full max to max. |
|
|
|
Post by Antonina of Philippopolis on Jun 24, 2020 3:40:10 GMT
So I removed his Counter attack and inspiration. I replaced it with assault and Alert.
I was hoping he'll be good for attacking artillery before Calvary comes in. Could I have made him better for this purpose?
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jun 24, 2020 3:54:02 GMT
So I removed his Counter attack and inspiration. I replaced it with assault and Alert. I was hoping he'll be good for attacking artillery before Calvary comes in. Could I have made him better for this purpose? I probably would not use alert because he is infantry and Infantry can already bulid defensives. I would add a Terrain abilty like mountain fighting so he is faster at reaching Artillery. |
|
|
|
Post by Antonina of Philippopolis on Jun 24, 2020 4:17:13 GMT
Ok thanks much! So I removed his Counter attack and inspiration. I replaced it with assault and Alert. I was hoping he'll be good for attacking artillery before Calvary comes in. Could I have made him better for this purpose? I probably would not use alert because he is infantry and Infantry can already bulid defensives. I would add a Terrain abilty like mountain fighting so he is faster at reaching Artillery. |
|
|
|
Post by ambitiousace on Jun 24, 2020 4:19:12 GMT
If you're planning to make him destroy artilleries,alert and forest fighting would be ideal
|
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jun 24, 2020 4:31:54 GMT
Ok thanks much! I probably would not use alert because he is infantry and Infantry can already bulid defensives. I would add a Terrain abilty like mountain fighting so he is faster at reaching Artillery. No problem! Does be perform better now? |
|
|
|
Post by Antonina of Philippopolis on Jun 24, 2020 4:49:21 GMT
Currently his attack is around 100+. I used up my books today: D so tomorrow I'll see about either terrains. No problem! Does be perform better now? |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jun 24, 2020 4:55:50 GMT
Currently his attack is around 100+. I used up my books today: D so tomorrow I'll see about either terrains. No problem! Does be perform better now? I would go for mountain fighting due to mountains having some defensives against Artillery. Also the terrain is quite common in the Alps so it's somewhat better in history mode. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 24, 2020 5:55:06 GMT
Don't invest too much into Grant, he's merely a beginner general that will last you until you are able to afford Lee/Boroevic/Haig/Straussenberg
|
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 24, 2020 5:57:26 GMT
infantry sucks so it's not a good idea to invest in them anyway, i'm going to just have lee, not going to get another inf general except for history mode. can Straussenberg be used for history?
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 24, 2020 6:01:25 GMT
infantry sucks so it's not a good idea to invest in them anyway, i'm going to just have lee, not going to get another inf general except for history mode. can Straussenberg be used for history? No, but Lee and Boroevic aren't too, yet they are the strongest inf gens ingame. The only history mode inf gens are MacArthur, MacMahon, Boyadzhiev, Misic, Bojovic, Bismarck, Falkenhausen, Petain and Garibaldi. |
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 24, 2020 6:03:52 GMT
infantry sucks so it's not a good idea to invest in them anyway, i'm going to just have lee, not going to get another inf general except for history mode. can Straussenberg be used for history? No, but Lee and Boroevic aren't too, yet they are the strongest inf gens ingame. The only history mode inf gens are MacArthur, MacMahon, Boyadzhiev, Misic, Bojovic, Bismarck, Falkenhausen, Petain and Garibaldi. yea well it would make sense to just invest in 1 infantry general who will be part of your main roster - used in campaign and challenge and just get all the other infantry you mentioned. it would still be better to buy arty and cav over inf for history tho. |
|
|
|
Post by Darth Vader on Jun 24, 2020 14:27:21 GMT
No, but Lee and Boroevic aren't too, yet they are the strongest inf gens ingame. The only history mode inf gens are MacArthur, MacMahon, Boyadzhiev, Misic, Bojovic, Bismarck, Falkenhausen, Petain and Garibaldi. yea well it would make sense to just invest in 1 infantry general who will be part of your main roster - used in campaign and challenge and just get all the other infantry you mentioned. it would still be better to buy arty and cav over inf for history tho. Not really, infantry has good movement and their abilty to bulid trenchs is great on the defensive. I don't recommend just Spaming Infantry but have a balance of the units you use because, each have advantages and disadvantages. |
|
|
|
Post by Torvesta on Jun 24, 2020 14:34:46 GMT
conquest challenge requires you to take enemy cities fast to weaken their economy. infantry is not good for that, you need cav + arty gens.
i only have lee for campaign because you usually start off with some infantry units. other than that, i have no use for him. i use 4 cav gens, 3 arty gens, lee, and 2 navy gens for most conquests
|
|
|
|
Post by Antonina of Philippopolis on Jun 24, 2020 14:36:34 GMT
infantry sucks so it's not a good idea to invest in them anyway, i'm going to just have lee, not going to get another inf general except for history mode. can Straussenberg be used for history? Infantry doesn't suck. Lol. I like using them to attack before using cav or artillery to finish the job and move to the next weak unit. I realize I'll probably have buy at least 3more generals for history mode. Since i have plenty of Gold and medals i figure I'll just invest into Grant for the last chapter in campaign. |
|
