|
|
Post by NetherFreek on Feb 1, 2018 12:08:48 GMT
 Captain Infantry 3 (5) Artillery 2 (3) Tank 0 (0) Air 2 (2) Navy 1 (4) Movement 3 (3) Economic Expert lvl2 Cover lvl1 Architecture lvl3 Price 750 Quick Navigation |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Aug 17, 2018 14:12:55 GMT
The only general you can buy with the cover skill. However, he isn’t worth it as his other two skills are trash. Plus its only level 1 cover as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlemagne on Aug 18, 2018 4:13:00 GMT
The only general you can buy with the cover skill. However, he isn’t worth it as his other two skills are trash. Plus its only level 1 cover as well. Inferior to tito who costs 325. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Dec 14, 2018 12:52:43 GMT
Mm upgrade him to 5 stars and he would be an okay defensive general. But he's still trash.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Dec 14, 2018 13:45:17 GMT
Mm upgrade him to 5 stars and he would be an okay defensive general. But he's still trash. Kuribiyashi would be a better buy in that situation. |
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Dec 16, 2018 2:41:47 GMT
Mm upgrade him to 5 stars and he would be an okay defensive general. But he's still trash. Kuribiyashi would be a better buy in that situation. Hmm but kuribiyashi focuses on offensive damage output (other than reinforcing forts which is poor), whereas tassigny is a more suited defensive general with econ and city. However, the reason why I said he is trash is because no one uses an infantry general to defend a city lest an enemy artillery general rekts him without getting hit, a heavy tank or a super with a general would be much more effective |
|
|
|
Post by Friedrich “Fried Rice” Paulus on Dec 16, 2018 18:41:01 GMT
Kuribiyashi would be a better buy in that situation. Hmm but kuribiyashi focuses on offensive damage output (other than reinforcing forts which is poor), whereas tassigny is a more suited defensive general with econ and city. However, the reason why I said he is trash is because no one uses an infantry general to defend a city lest an enemy artillery general rekts him without getting hit, a heavy tank or a super with a general would be much more effective Yep, that’s exactly the situation. |
|
|
|
Post by charliator80470 on Dec 31, 2018 14:58:28 GMT
the full name is " de lattre de tassigny "
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Jun 17, 2019 22:22:19 GMT
If economic expert and architecture worked by percentage rather than cardinal numbers, and if his infantry stars were instead tank ones, he would be the best defensive general in the game. Put him in a city with high income and you would never run short of money. Sadly, that’s not the reality.
|
|
|
|
Post by Harry Lillis "Bing" Crosby Jr on Jun 18, 2019 9:31:45 GMT
If economic expert and architecture worked by percentage rather than cardinal numbers, and if his infantry stars were instead tank ones, he would be the best defensive general in the game. Put him in a city with high income and you would never run short of money. Sadly, that’s not the reality. shove rumor and tech expert and he'll be even better |
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Jun 23, 2019 15:03:25 GMT
A nice defensive Infantry general, if you ask me, but defensive infantry generals aren’t that good if it isn’t a Commando. But he has potential. Max out his skills, infantry stars and put him on the Finnish/Yugoslavian commandos. Then put him on a city with a field hospital. Can be a good city defender. And he is very cheap, costing only 750 medals.
He can be given the Gold Star Medal to increase his Economic Expert power.
Then again, he is inferior to Tito, and Kuribayashi does a better job than him at being defensive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gone on Sept 6, 2019 0:21:41 GMT
IMO, Tassigny's only real use is having him for tasks that feature Cover, and even then, I don’t think that buying generals just for tasks is a good idea. Crerar might be an exception because his skills are really good for his super cheap price.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sun Li-jen of the Glorious RoC on Apr 30, 2020 3:37:42 GMT
Quality: 1/5 (Is this supposed to be a joke?)
Cost effectiveness: 1/3 (expensive)
This guy is one of the worst purchasable generals. His skills aren't that bad, if only he was not an infantry general. His abilities are also spread all over the place like a terrible hybrid. You will never want him in your HQ even as beginner players. Consider his price as well, not worth it.
He has 3/5 infantry star (not useful), 2/3 artillery (also very poor), 0/4 navy (who would have upgraded and used his navy??), 3 movement, and 2 air force stars (doesn't help much). No one would like to upgrade his stars (which requires a lot medals) as you can get a much better infantry/artillery gen with a slightly more medals than him.
His skills are economic expert lv2 (actually pretty good when being upgraded and put on an air force gen, but not in his case), cover lv1 (not bad, but machinist and replacement are way better), and architecture lv3 (not good, especially on infantry and artillery). With no empty skill slot to add rumor.
He makes a terrible general. You wouldn't want a defensive infantry/artillery general. And you would never upgrade and use his navy. He doesn't even have any tank abilities, while he is a city defender general. Consider his price and your limited HQ seats.
Note: do not buy him.
|
|
